Valence bond theory c So Hirata Department of Chemistry University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign This material has been developed and made available online by work supported jointly by University of Illinois the National Science Foundation under Grant CHE1118616 CAREER and the Cami ID: 433574
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Lecture 24" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Lecture 24Valence bond theory
(c) So Hirata, Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
This material has
been developed and made available online by work supported jointly by University of Illinois, the National Science Foundation under Grant CHE-1118616 (CAREER), and the Camille & Henry Dreyfus Foundation, Inc. through the Camille Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar program. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsoring agencies
.Slide2
Valence bond theory
There
are two
major approximate
theories of chemical
bonds:
valence bond
(VB) theory
and molecular orbital
(MO) theory.
While computationally less widely used than MO, VB has a special appeal to organic chemists studying reaction mechanisms and remains useful and important.
The concepts of
sp
n
hybridization
and
lone pairs
are introduced.Slide3
Orbital approximation
In
polyelectron
atoms, we
used the
orbital
approximation
– forced separation of variables – where we
filled
hydrogenic
orbitals with
electrons to construct atomic wave functions.
For polyatomic
molecules, can we also use orbital approximation? Can we use
hydrogenic
atomic orbitals
to construct molecular wave functions?Slide4
Singlet and triplet He (review)
In the
orbital approximation
for (1
s
)
1
(2s)1 He, there are four different ways of filling two electrons:
Anti-symmetric
Anti-symmetric
Anti-symmetric
Singlet
Triplet
more stableSlide5
VB theory for H
2
Let us construct the molecular wave function of H
2
using its two 1
s
orbitals
A and B.Slide6
VB theory for H
2
singlet
more stable
triplet
e
n
n
e
e
n
n
eSlide7
Covalent bond
Enhanced electron probability density between nuclei (shielding nucleus-nucleus repulsion). The greater the overlap of two AO’s the stronger the bond.
Two singlet-coupled (
α
1
β
2−
β
1
α
2) electrons for one bond (
Lewis structure).Slide8
σ
and π bonds
A
π
bond is weaker than
σ
bond because of a less orbital overlap in
π
.
σ
bond
π
bondSlide9
N
2
N is (1
s
)
2
(2
s)2(2p
x)1(2p
y)1(2pz)
1N2 forms one σ bond
and two π bonds. Altogether three-fold covalent bonds (triple bonds).Slide10
H
2
O
O
is
(1
s
)2(2s)
2(2px)2
(2py)1(2pz)
1.The two unpaired electrons in 2p
orbitals can each form a σ bond with H (1s)1.
This explains the HOH angle of near 90º. Slide11
NH3
N is (1
s
)
2
(2
s
)2(2px
)1(2py)1
(2pz)1.The
three unpaired electrons in 2p orbitals can each form a σ bond
with H (1s)1.This explains the pyramidal structure with the HNH angle of near 90
º. Slide12
Promotion and hybridization
C
(1
s
)
2
(
2s)2(2px)1(2
py)1 is known to form
four equivalent bonds as in CH4.
1
s
2
s
2
p
valence
1
s
2
s
2
p
valence
Promotion
– we invest a
small energy in C
for a
bigger energy gain (4 bonds instead of 2) in CH
4
Still not equivalentSlide13
sp
3
hybridization
From one
s
and three
p
orbitals, we form four
equivalent bonds by linearly combing them:
x
y
z
These are orthonormalSlide14
CH
4
With the
sp
3
hybridization, C
is (1
s)2(sp
3)1(sp3
)1(sp3)1(
sp3)1. The
four unpaired electrons in the four sp3 orbitals can each form a σ
bond with H (1s
)1.This explains the tetrahedron structure of CH4 with the HCH angle of
precisely 109.47º.Slide15
sp2 hybridization
From one
s
and
two
p
orbitals, we form three equivalent bonds by linearly combing them:
x
y
These are orthonormalSlide16
CH
2
=CH
2
With the
sp
2
hybridization, C is (1s)
2(2pz)1 (
sp2)1(sp2)
1(sp2)1
. Three unpaired electrons in three sp2 orbitals can each form a
σ bond with H(
1s)1 or C(sp2)
1. C(2pz)1
additionally forms a π bond.This explains the planar structure of ethylene with the HCH and CCH angles
of near 120º.Slide17
sp1 hybridization
From one
s
and
one
p
orbital,
we form two equivalent bonds by linearly combing them:
These are orthonormalSlide18
CHΞCH
With the
sp
1
hybridization, C is (1
s
)2(2pz)1
(2py)1(
sp1)1(sp1)
1. Two unpaired electrons in two
sp1 orbitals can each form a σ bond with H(1
s)1 or C(sp1)
1. C(2pz)1
and (2py)1
form two π bonds.This explains the linear structure
of acetylene.
Cf. H2OSlide19
Lone pairs
Revisit H
2
O
.
O
is
(1s)2(2s)2
(2px)2(2
py)1(2pz)1
.Two unpaired electrons each form a covalent bond: O(2py
)1H(1s)1 and O(2pz
)1H(1s)1
Two valence electrons that do not participate in chemical bond are called a lone pair: O(2s
)2 and O(2px)2.
Lone pairs are part of electron density not shielding nucleus-nucleus repulsion and thus not being stabilized by nuclear charges. They are naked electron pairs that repel other lone pairs or bonding electron pairs.Slide20
Lone pairs in H
2
O
Two different views of H
2
O:
nonhybridized
versus sp3
hybridized
The observed HOH angle is 104.5º, closer to the sp3 picture, suggesting that lone-pair repulsion plays a significant role.
sp
3 picture suggests HOH angle ~
109.5º
Nonhybridization
suggests HOH angle ~ 90º
sp3 lone pairsp3 lone pair
2s lone pair
2pz lone pairSlide21
Lone pairs in NH
3
Two different views of NH
3
:
nonhybridized
versus
sp3 hybridized
The
observed HNH angle is 107º, much closer to the sp3 picture, suggesting that a dominating role of lone-pair repulsion.
sp
3 picture suggests
HNH angle ~ 109.5º
Nonhybridization
suggests HNH angle ~ 90º
sp3 lone pair2
s lone pairSlide22
Lone pairs in H
2
X
The larger the central atom in the
isovalence
H
2
X series, the more widely spread valence p and
s orbitals and the less lone-pair repulsions. H2Te has no need to promote and hybridize
(HTeH angle of 89.5º), whereas H2O gains
much by promoting and hybridizing into sp3 and separating the lone pairs widely.
H
2
X
HXH angle
H
2O
104.5
H
2
S
92.2
H
2
Se
91.0
H
2
Te
89.5Slide23
Homework challenge #7
C
is
(1
s
)
2
(2s)2(2px)
1(2py)1
. Is methylene CH2 bent (nonhybridized p, sp
2, sp3) or linear (sp
1)?Find the answer in the following paper and report.“Methylene: A Paradigm for Computational Quantum Chemistry” by Henry F. Schaefer III,
Science, volume 231, page 1100, 7 March 1986.Slide24
Summary
VB theory
is
an orbital approximation
for molecules. The orbitals used are
hydrogenic
atomic orbitals.VB theory explains the Lewis structure (two singlet-coupled electrons – α
and β spins – per bond).This explains σ and
π bond, promotion and spn hybridization
, lone pairs.Lone-pair repulsion is important in determining molecular structures.