with Students Carl S Moore Assistant Director Carlmooretempleedu Teaching and Learning Center Temple University Wood D Bruner J S amp Ross G 1976 The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving Journal of child psychology and psychiatry 172 89100 ID: 382518
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Lecture Reconsidered: Teaching" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Lecture Reconsidered: Teaching
with Students
Carl S. Moore, Assistant Director
Carl.moore@temple.edu
Teaching and Learning Center
Temple University Slide2
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving*. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.
Workshop Outline RESEARCH ON LECTURE
LITERATURE ON STUDENT LEARNING
CONNECTING THE DOTS
USING STUDENTS TO
REACH THE LEARNING GOAL
BEST PRACTICES
LECTURE RECONSIDERED THINK TANK
CLOSING
Slide3
WORKSHOP GOALS
LEAVING THIS WORKSHOP PARTICIPANTS SHOULD:
Reconceptualize
the way lecture is viewed as a teaching method
Identify strategies and tools that can be used to engage students Slide4
Lecture ReconsideredSlide5
Lecture Reconsidered
(
Freire
, 1998)Slide6
What is a lecture?
Bligh (2000)’s meta-analysis of attention span in lectures indicates:
12
minutes
optimum time for focusing
No more than
20
minutes
of uninterrupted talk
Bligh (2000)’s meta-analysis of attention span in lectures indicates:
12
minutes optimum time for focusing
No
more than 20 minutes
of
uninterrupted
talk Slide7
Bligh (2000)’s meta-analysis of attention span in lectures indicates:
12
minutes
optimum time for focusing
No more than
20
minutes
of uninterrupted talk
(Hake, 1998)Slide8
Engaging Students
What do you see?
How does this picture relate to engaging students?Slide9
Best Practices
Change every 15 -20 minutes
Think-Pair-
Share
Have student present the lecture material
Use of technology such as Poll Everywhere
Connect Cards
Group Notes (in class/wiki)Slide10
Think Tank
What are some strategies that you have used to engage students in your classroom?
Small vs. Large? Slide11
Check-In with Poll Everywhere
What is one thing you will continue to do or will try as a result of attending this workshop?Slide12
References
Bloom, B. S. (1956).
Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook 1: Cognitive domain
. New York: Longmans
Green
Blumer
, H. (1986).
Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method
. University of California Press.
Freire
, A. M. A., &
Macedo
, D. (1998).
The Paulo
Freire
Reader
.
Cassell
and Continuum, 370 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10017
.
Gokhale
, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking
.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses.
American journal of Physics
,
66
,
64
Watkins
, C. J. C. H., & Dayan, P. (1992)
. Learning
.
Machine Learning
,
8
(3),
279
-292
.