/
PXL Sensors Overview PXL Sensors Overview

PXL Sensors Overview - PowerPoint Presentation

lindy-dunigan
lindy-dunigan . @lindy-dunigan
Follow
393 views
Uploaded On 2016-07-03

PXL Sensors Overview - PPT Presentation

Sensor Requirements Sensor requirements consistent with IPHC development direction 2 cm x 2 cm 1 reticle size Pixel size lt 30 µm Integration time of 200 µs for L 8 x 10 27 cm ID: 389505

sensors readout time sensor readout sensors sensor time integration pixel phase pxl maps generation analog radiation iphc results substrate size development noise

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "PXL Sensors Overview" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

PXL Sensors OverviewSlide2

Sensor RequirementsSensor requirements (consistent with IPHC development direction)

~2 cm x 2 cm (1 reticle) size.

Pixel size < 30 µm.

Integration time of ≤ 200 µs for L = 8 x 10

27

cm

-2

s

-1

Power dissipation ≤ 170 mW/cm

2

(air cooling)

Binary output with remote threshold adjustment

Efficiency of ≥ 95% for MIPs with a simultaneous accidental noise rate of ≤ 10

-4

Maintain efficiency and accidental rate after radiation exposure of

90 kRad and

10

12

1 MeV n

eq

/ cm

2

.

≤ 4 LVDS output channels (ladder space)

Remote configurationSlide3

Talk OutlineMAPS @ IPHC

Principle of operation

Readout speed and integration time

Radiation hardness

PXL sensors development path

Current generation of sensors

Characteristics

Testing results

Next generation of sensors

Sensor interface

High resistivity substrateSlide4

MAPS @ IPHC

Principle of operation

Readout speed and integration time

Radiation hardness

PXL sensors development path

Current generation of sensors

Characteristics

Testing results

Next generation of sensors

Sensor interfaces

High resistivity substrateSlide5

MAPS @ Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert CurienIPHC-DRS (former IRES/LEPSI) proposed using MAPS for high energy physics in 1999

CMOS & ILC group today

6 physists

9 microcircuit designers

6 test engineers

7 PhD students

CNRS - IPHC, Strasbourg-Cronenbourg

More than 30 prototypes developed

several pixel sizes and architectures (simple 3-transistor cells, pixels with in-pixel amplifiers and CDS processing)

different readout strategies (sensors operated in current and voltage mode, analog and digital output)

Large variety of prototype sizes (from several hundreds of pixels up to 1M pixel prototype with full-reticule size)

MIMOSA (Minimum Ionizing particle MOS Active sensor) Slide6

Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors

Standard commercial CMOS technology

Room temperature operation

Sensor and signal processing are integrated in the same silicon wafer

Signal is created in the low-doped epitaxial layer (typically ~10-15 μm) → MIP signal is limited to <1000 electrons

Charge collection is mainly through thermal diffusion (~100 ns), reflective boundaries at p-well and substrate → cluster size is about ~10 pixels (20-30 μm pitch)

100% fill-factor

Fast readout

Proven thinning to 50 micron

MAPS pixel cross-section (not to scale)

‏Slide7

Charge Sharing and Cluster SizeBased on tests of several different prototypesS/N>12 allows detection efficiency >99.6%

MimoSTAR2 test results

(30

μ

m pixel pitch)Slide8

MAPS Integration Time = Readout Time

Typical sensor readout

Raster scan

Charge integration time = array readout time

Multiplexed sub-arrays to decrease integration time

Column parallel readout architecture

All columns readout in parallel and then multiplexed to one output

Charge integration time = column readout timeSlide9

From Analog to Binary Readout

Digital readout – offers increased speed but requires on-chip discriminators or ADCs and increased S/N for on-chip signal processing

Analog readout – simpler architecture but slower readoutSlide10

MAPS – Ionizing RadiationSlide11

MAPS – Non-ionizing RadiationSlide12

MAPS @ IPHC

Principle of operation

Readout speed and integration time

Radiation hardness

PXL sensors development path

Current generation of sensors

Characteristics

Testing results

Next generation of sensors

Sensor interfacesHigh resistivity substrateSlide13

PXL Sensors Development Path

Pixel

Sensors

CDS

ADC

Data

sparsification

readout

to DAQ

analog

signals

Complementary detector readout

MimoSTAR sensors 4 ms integration time

PXL final sensors (Ultimate) < 200 μs integration time

analog

digital

digital signals

Disc.

CDS

Phase-1 sensors 640 μs integration time

Sensor and RDO Development Path

1

2

3Slide14

Current Generation of Sensors

Phase-1 prototype

Architecture based on Mimosa22

AMS-C35B4/OPTO which uses 4 metal- and 2 poly- layers

14 μm epitaxial layer

Reticle size (~ 4 cm²)

Pixel pitch 30 μm

~ 410 k pixels

Column parallel readout

Column discriminatorsBinary readout of all pixelsData multiplexed onto 4 LVDS outputs @ 160 MHzIntegration time 640 μs

Functionality tests and yield look very good.

Measured ENC is 15 e-.Beam test to measure MIP efficiency planned for 2010.

Phase-2 prototype

Small mask adjustments to improve discriminator threshold dispersion Slide15

Phase1/2 Testing Results

Discriminator transfer functions:

Phase-1

FPN 0.6 mV to 1 mV

temporal noise 1-1.2 mV

Phase-2

FPN ~0.5 mV

temporal noise ~0.9 mV

55

Fe calibrations: noise ~14 e─

ADC counts

Threshold (mV)

Column #

Row #

1

0

countsSlide16

Phase 1 vs. Phase 2

In Phase-2 the magnitude of discriminator threshold variations is smaller than in Phase-1

.

Phase-1 chip B6

Phase-2 chip A2

Our test results feed back to IPHC designs to improve sensor performanceSlide17

Next Generation PXL Sensor

Design based on Mimosa26 architecture

Reticle size (~ 4 cm²)

Pixel pitch 20.7 μm (recent change)

890 k pixels

Reduced power dissipation

Vdd: 3.0 V

Optimized pixel pitch vs. Non-ionising radiation tolerance

Estimated power consumption ~134 mW/cm²

Short integration time 185.6 μs

Improved pixel architecture

Optimized discriminator timing

Improved threshold uniformity on-chip zero suppression 2 LVDS data outputs @ 160 MHzZero suppression circuitry (SUZE)Slide18

Mimosa26Slide19

On-chip Zero SuppressionSlide20

Data Format After Zero SuppressionSlide21

PXL Sensor TestabilitySlide22

Phase1 and Final PXL Sensor Interface

Phase 1 and Phase 2

Final PXL sensor

Inputs

LVDS

/CMOS

CLK

JTAG: TCK, TMS, TDI, TDO, Reset

START,

SPEAK

Vlcp

(analog reference voltage)

Outputs

8 x analog output

4 x LVDS

2 x LVDS

16 x LVCMOS

(?)

LAST_ROW

CLKD

Test pad1, test pad2

DAC test pads (including

Vref1, Vref2

)

Required “ladder” interface

Required testing interfaceSlide23

MAPS @ IPHC

Principle of operation

Readout speed and integration time

Radiation hardness

PXL sensors development path

Current generation of sensors

Characteristics

Testing results

Next generation of sensors

Sensor interfacesHigh resistivity substrateSlide24

New Prototype on High Resistivity SubstrateSlide25

Sensor performance with HR substrateSlide26

SummarySensor performance satisfies requirements

Sensors design at IPHC is on schedule

High resistivity substrate dramatically improves S/N and removes radiation hardness issues

The design of the final PXL sensor will benefit from the ongoing tests of Mimosa22HR and latch up tests of Mimosa22HR and memory prototypes planned later this year

Phase-2 will be used for ladder prototyping

We will build a 3-sector detector prototype equipped with Phase-2 sensors to test it at STAR (2012)Slide27

Backup slidesSlide28

Phase1/2 testing results

The Phase-1 performance tested on several chips1 demonstrated FPN ranging from 0.6 mV to 1 mV and temporal noise estimated at 1-1.2 mV.Slide29

MAPS principle of operation

Continuous reverse bias (self-biased)

Classical diode with reset

Reset noise, offset

No reset noise, no offset

read

readSlide30

Sensor/RDO Requirements by generationMimostar–2

30

µ

m pixel, 128 x 128 array

1.7 ms integration time

1 analog output

Mimostar–3

30

µ

m pixel, 320 x 640 array2.0 ms integration time2 analog outputsPhase–1/230 µ

m pixel, 640 x 640 array640 µs

integration time, CDS4 binary digital outputs

Final (Ultimate)18.4

µm pixel, 1024 x 1088 array≤

200 µs integration time, CDS,zero suppression2 digital outputs (addresses)SensorSensor RDO

50 MHz readout clock

JTAG interface, control infrastructure

ADCs, FPGA CDS & cluster finding

zero suppression

≤ 4 sensor simultaneous readout

160 MHz readout clock

JTAG interface, control infrastructure

zero suppression

120 sensor simultaneous readout

160 MHz readout clock

JTAG interface, control infrastructure

400 sensor simultaneous readout

(full system)

DONE

PROTOTYPED

Gen

1

1

2

3