/
Reaching a Verdict Reaching a Verdict

Reaching a Verdict - PowerPoint Presentation

lindy-dunigan
lindy-dunigan . @lindy-dunigan
Follow
388 views
Uploaded On 2015-10-14

Reaching a Verdict - PPT Presentation

THE SUMMATION Each side summarizes its key arguments and evidence No new evidence can be introduced If the defence presented evidence it goes first Law amp Order Closing Arguments George Zimmerman closing arguments ID: 160094

evidence jury facts case jury evidence case facts arguments judge law legal closing doctor macneill important jurors charge zimmerman george verdict doubt

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Reaching a Verdict" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Reaching a VerdictSlide2

THE SUMMATION

Each

side summarizes its key arguments and evidence

No new evidence can be introduced

If the

defence

presented evidence, it goes first

Law & Order Closing Arguments

George Zimmerman closing argumentsSlide3

THE CHARGE TO THE JURY

The

judge reviews the facts and defines the legal issues in the case for the juryShe can indicate which evidence is more important than others

The charge to the jury is often the basis for appeals if one side sees legal errors which may prejudice the jury

George Zimmerman CaseSlide4

JURY DELIBERATION

Verdicts

must be unanimousNote-taking is not always allowed so jurors must often rely on their memories

The jurors determine the facts in the case; the judge at this stage only rules on lawFacts are considered in two steps:Is the evidence believable?

How important is the believable evidence?

What the jury believes determines which law applies. Ex. A hunting incident

Reasonable doubt means that the jury gives the accused the benefit of the doubt

It also means if they believe the defence’s evidence or can’t decide whom to believe, they must acquit

If the judge accepts their inability to reach a decision, they are dismissed ( a hung jury)

A jury may never disclose what went on in the jury room

Doctor MacNeill Murders wifeSlide5

OUTCOME

A

defendant acquitted is free to goThe jury usually has no say in the penaltySentencing may occur then or at a later

date

Sentencing Hearing – Trevor

Zinck

Doctor

MacNeill

Case Reaches a verdict