Dr E Habibi Fiber reinforced composites are high strength filling materials composed of conventional composites and fibres FRCs are structural materials with two distinct constituents The reinforcing component provides stiffness and strength while the surrounding matrix su ID: 595671
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The Clinical Applications of Fiber Reinf..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
The Clinical Applications of Fiber Reinforced Composites
Dr
E.
HabibiSlide2
-Fiber reinforced composites are high strength filling materials composed of
conventional composites
and fibres.Slide3
FRCs are structural materials with two distinct constituents. The reinforcing component provides stiffness and strength while the surrounding matrix supports the reinforcement and provides workability. The fibers most commonly employed in dental applications for reinforcement are
polyethylene
,
glass,
polypropylene, carbon or aramid. The matrix comprises of epoxy resinSlide4
Typically, fibers are 7 to 10 µm in diameter and span the length of the prosthesis or appliance. By comparison, the particles used in standard restorative dental composites are 1 to 5 µm in diameter, or submicron in size.Slide5Slide6
-
Woven fiber is less technique-sensitive
, has lesser flexural strength and easier to manipulate hence conforms to the desired shape and maintains its adaptation during placement and is the ideal choice while making an appliance for rotated or
malpositioned
teeth. - Unidirectional fiber has greater flexure strength and rigidity and is the better choice for high stress situations as in
prosthodontic
frameworksSlide7
The Two Approaches have Evolved Namely Non-Impregnated and Pre-Impregnated
Non Impregnated
Pre-Impregnated FibersSlide8
How FRC Materials Work?
Types of fiber
Direction of fibersSlide9
Periodontal Splinting
Single
Visit BridgesProvisional BridgesComposite RestorationTrauma
Stabilization
Space maintainerEndodontic Post and CoresSlide10
Periodontal Splinting
Easy to Make
Esthetic Strong Durable
ProvenSlide11Slide12Slide13
Fiber-reinforced Composite Resin BridgesSlide14
Introduction
Loss of anterior tooth may be a catastrophic event for the patientSlide15
The Fiber-Reinforced Resin-Bonded Bridge
Advantages
Cost effective
Less or zero reduction in healthy tooth structure
Takes short duration of timeHygienicNonallergenicSingle tooth replacement premolar or incisorideal indication for lower incisorsSlide16
The Fiber-Reinforced Resin-Bonded Bridge
A review of the dental literature suggests that
the
FRC prostheses have good longevity, especially those which
are made by the direct techniqueSlide17
The Fiber-Reinforced Resin-Bonded Bridge
Three forms of
pontics can be made for the FRC bridges:
natural extracted teeth,
with acrylic resin teeth using composite resin. Slide18
Natural T
ooth
Pontic
If the natural tooth is available
and if its crown is in good condition, it can be bonded easily to the adjacent teeth by using a light-cured restorative material. Using the natural tooth as a
pontic
offers the benefits of being the
right
size
, shape and
colour
, along with producing good aesthetic and
functional
results Slide19
Considerations for Utilization of a Natural Tooth Pontic
Several factors must be taken into consideration when choosing a natural tooth
pontic as an interim provisional.
First
and foremost, the extracted tooth should possess an intact, clinical crown that is of ideal shape, contour, and shade, with intrinsic characterization that ideally matches the adjacent dentition.The functional occlusal stress on the pontic site should be minimal, and the patient's preoperative centric, working, and nonworking contacts must be assessed to determine whether displacing forces can be reduced or eliminated. Slide20
A 45-year-old female
patient
The patient was not in pain, and her primary dental concern was to remain current with her biannual prophylactic
recare
visits. A comprehensive examination including periodontal charting, intraoral photographs, and a full-mouth series of radiographs was performed. Slide21
T
ooth
No.
21
exhibited Class I to Class II mobility with all other visual findings being within normal limits (Figure 1). Dental history,
she
indicated that, as a teenager, she had an accident that displaced teeth Nos.
11
and
21
,
and tooth No.
21
had required root canal therapy after becoming
nonvital
.
Several
cracks in both teeth were observed during the visual exam with
transillumination
, but none were symptomatic.
Closer
inspection of the
periapical
radiograph
indicated
that tooth No.
21
was in a state of active internal
resorption
and the tooth was diagnosed as hopeless (Figure 2).
When
the patient was informed that the diagnosis for her maxillary left central incisor was hopeless, she was heartbroken.Slide22Slide23Slide24
The 2-mm
Ribbond
THM ribbon was chosen for this case due to its minimal thickness, leno-weave construction, ease of adaptation to the teeth, and overall superior strength.
A
rectangular slot was prepared on the lingual aspect of the natural tooth
pontic
to secure the
Ribbond
THM and to assure that it remained out of occlusion. The finalized
pontic
with a rectangular lingual slot is shown in Figure 10Slide25
Ribbond
strands cannot be cut with conventional scissors; this most recent product includes a slimmer and more compact industrial-grade scissor, as compared to the more bulky version supplied with earlier kits.
The
manufacturer recommends the use of
Ribbond Wetting Resin (Ribbond), a product sold separately. Slide26Slide27Slide28
A
thin coat of
Ribbond
Securing Resin (
Ribbond) was applied to the lingual and interproximal surfaces of adjacent teeth.
The
Ribbond
THM was then seated at the desired position and adapted first with finger pressure, then with a thin IPC hand instrument. Care must be taken to ensure that the edges of the fiber are flush against the teeth, and that the material wraps slightly into the interproximal areas roughly to the previous contact area. Slide29Slide30Slide31
Composite pontic
A 76-year-old female patient presented with a missing mandibular left lateral incisor that had been recently extracted because of severe root caries on the distal surface that had made the tooth
unrestorable
(Figure 1). Slide32
Upon clinical and radiographic examination, it was noted that there was not enough remaining bone in the labial-lingual direction to consider an implant.
Also
, the teeth adjacent to the edentulous space, aside from having some
crestal
bone loss, were unrestored. The crown-to-root ratio and mesiodistal root diameter at the gingival crest of the mandibular left central incisor were not favorable due to the alveolar bone loss, making it a questionable abutment for a fixed partial denture. Slide33
A lingual view shows the abutment teeth that were prepared with a slot cut in the lingual surfaces to contain the imbedded fiber reinforcement to provide the "framework" to freehand the
nanocomposite
resin
pontic
in the edentulous space.Slide34
G-aenial Bond (GC America), a seventh-generation self-etching bonding agent, was dispensed into a disposable
mixing well
.
The bonding agent was applied to all prepared surfaces using a microbrush
.The bonding agent was then light-cured for 20 secondsSlide35
The
flowable
composite resin (G-aenial Universal Flo) with an applicator tip applied to the end of the syringe; the long, narrow cannula makes precise placement very easy
.
G-aenial Universal Flo was syringed into the preparations in a thin coat. The fiber reinforcement was placed into the floor of the preparations, and they were then filled with flowable composite to the cavosurface margins and light-cured.Slide36
Next, the flowable composite was placed on the stabilized fiberglass fiber (Connect [Kerr]) to wet the surface between the teeth with composite resin. It was then light-cured for 20
seconds
This facial view shows the composite-reinforced fiberglass reinforcement in placeSlide37
Kalore AO3 was used to begin building a pontic on the fiber between the abutment teeth
.
A plastic instrument (Goldstein Flexithin Mini 4 [Hu-Friedy]) was used for shaping A3.5 as the base dentin for the pontic. Kalore CV (B5) was used to simulate a root form similar to the adjacent teeth.Slide38
A sable brush (Keystone No. 4 Flat [Patterson Dental]) was used to create surface texture and refine anatomic form.
Kalore DT was used to create incisal translucency.Slide39
After initial contouring with an 8-fluted carbide composite finishing bur, contouring was completed using abrasive discs (Optidisc [Kerr]).
A yellow disc (Jiffy Disc [Ultradent Products]) was then used to polish the labial surface, and to refine the reflective angles and surface texture.Slide40
Facial view of the completed fiber-reinforced direct
nanocomposite
resin bridgeSlide41Slide42Slide43Slide44Slide45
Trauma Stabilization
Easy to make and remove
Thin, smooth, and non-irritating to the lip Easy to control the degree of rigidity
Easy maintenance of oral hygiene
Does not impinge on the gingiva Has no memory - does not move the teeth Slide46
Space maintainerSlide47
Endodontic Post and CoresSlide48
Fiber PostSlide49
Thanks for your attention