PPT-Arguing Generatively and Persuasively
Author : lois-ondreau | Published Date : 2018-10-31
Charles Paine Professor University of New Mexico Richard JohnsonSheehan Professor Purdue University Welcome Arguing Today Controlling metaphor for argument Argument
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Arguing Generatively and Persuasively" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Arguing Generatively and Persuasively: Transcript
Charles Paine Professor University of New Mexico Richard JohnsonSheehan Professor Purdue University Welcome Arguing Today Controlling metaphor for argument Argument is War Consequences of this metaphor. Mullany and Handford14 (arguing for liability based on reasonable foreseeability), but the House took the view that it could not alter the law [1999] 2 AC 455. 13 In chap. 7 of vol 2 of The Frontier Marketing, communications and storytelling persuasively (especially for academics) Stephanie Balzer Stephanie.balzer@uafoundation.org 520 - 730 - 2366 Story , Robert McKee A quintessential text for The Kuhn-loss thesis arguing that scien-tific revolutions, alongside gains, involvelosses (e. g. those of explanatory powerand of problem-solving ability) occupiesquite an important position in theKuh Rebel arguing that Sanger biographers and scholars of the birth control movement had an oversimplified understanding of its rhetorical form and function. The undertakes a systematic critique of pri 1878-1945. He was a German playwright who wrote many plays in a number of different styles. An Expressionist dramatist, he was the most frequently performed playwright of the Weimar Republic (the German Government of the time).. Machine. Analysis of Auto-Generated Code. Jacob . Cox. Jacob.t.cox@ivv.nasa.gov. 1. Agenda. Types of code . verification. General discussion of code generation. Some experiences. 2. The Simple Life. In the beginning . FIE 2009: Special Session. Holly Matusovich, Virginia Tech. Karl Smith, Purdue University/U of MN. Introduce Constructive Academic Controversy (CAC) ~ 15 min. Actively Participate in CAC ~60 min. Topic: . Word Pitfalls. Avoiding common pitfalls in our speech requires constant vigilance and consistent prayer. . Word Pitfalls. Excessive speech (10:19; 17:28).. Godly Words. When words abound, transgression is inevitable, but the one who restrains his words is wise.. Question: What do the following things have in common?. Answer. : All of them represent argumentation in contemporary society. . Everything’s an Argument. Unit 1, Lesson 1. TASK 1 – Arguments Are Everywhere. What’s at Stake in Teaching Argument. James Miller. University of Wisconsin-Whitewater. Texas State Board of Education: Who’s In, Who’s Out. President Barack Obama, 2014. “Now is the time to build a firmer, stronger foundation for growth that will not only withstand future economic storms, but one that helps us strive and compete in the global economy. It’s time to reform our colleges so that they provide Americans a chance to learn the skills and knowledge necessary to compete for the jobs of the future.” . 18 hours = 6 classes. 101 & 102 do NOT count. W. hy take an . English . minor? . It is USEFUL to you no matter what your major is.. A . University of Maryland study found two traits that presidents of Fortune 500 companies had in common: . (when sinned against). Fear . (of death & suffering). PRIDE. Holier-than -thou. Discontentment. Negative . Thinking. W. orry. Arguing. Philippians 2:14 . niv. Do. EVERYTHING. without. COMPLAINING. flourishing. Dr. John Barry. j.barry@qub.ac.uk. Background. Imagining an economics...and life... beyond orthodox growth. “. questioning growth is deemed to be the act of lunatics, idealists and revolutionaries. Why Argue?. Argument is not in itself an end or a purpose of communication. It is rather a means of discourse, a way of developing what we have to say. We can identify four primary aims or purposes that argument helps us accomplish:.
Download Document
Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Arguing Generatively and Persuasively"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.
Related Documents