972017 Nevada Department of Education for Internal Use Only 2017 Victory Program and Purpose Victory came into existence in 2015 Victory Schools are identified as the lowest performing schools in the highest poverty zip codes in the ID: 638218
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Progress Report and Potential Action on ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Progress Report and Potential Action on Victory Schools9/7/2017
Nevada Department of Education for Internal Use Only 2017Slide2
Victory Program and PurposeVictory came into existence in 2015Victory Schools are identified as the lowest performing schools in the highest poverty zip codes in the
state
35 schools in 5 districts were identified
(
Clark, Elko, Humboldt, Nye, & Washoe
)
Three
main goals of
AB 447:
Students are able to read at or above the 3
rd
grade level by the end of 3
rd
grade
Students are prepared to engage in a rigorous high school curriculum by the end of 8
th
grade, and
Students graduate from high school ready to succeed in college or a career.Slide3
AB 447 Victory School Strategies (Section 2, subsection 8 and 9)
AB 447 Subsection 8
AB 447 Subsection 9
a. Pre-K program
a. Provide evidence-based social, psychological or health care services to pupils and their families, including wrap-around services
b. Summer Academy or other instruction for pupils free of charge at times during the year when school is not in sessionb. Provide programs and services designed to engage parents and familiesc. Additional instruction or other learning opportunities free of charge at times of day when school is not in sessionc. Provide programs to improve school climate and cultured. Professional developmentd. If the Victory school is a high school, provide additional instruction or other learning opportunities for pupils and professional development for teachers at an elementary school, middle school or junior high school that is located within the zone of attendance of the high school and is not also designated as a Victory schoole. Incentives for hiring and retaining teachers and other licensed educational personnelf. Employment of paraprofessionals and other educational personnel/persons who provide programs or servicesg. Reading Skills Centerh. Integrated student supports, wrap-around services, and evidence-based programs designed to meet the needs of pupils who attend the school
Victory Schools shall use the majority of the money for strategies listed in Subsection
8 (AB
447 Sec 2.8)
Victory
Schools may use a minority funding amount for strategies listed in Subsection 9 (AB 447 Sec 2.9)
*
Note:
Full-day kindergarten was removed as a strategy in subsection
8
I
ntegrated
student supports,
wrap-around services, and evidence-based programs designed to meet the needs of pupils who attend the school was added to subsection
8
Subsection 9d was added during the legislative sessionSlide4
Victory Schools
School Types
Urban Elem School
Urban Middle School
Urban
High SchoolRural ElemSchoolRural Middle SchoolRural High SchoolNative American Elem SchoolNative American High SchoolClark18321Elko1111Humboldt11Nye1Washoe211Total=3520333132Slide5
Victory Allocations for 2015-2017 and current SY 2017-2018Victory Schools receive approximately $50 million (SB 515, Section 28): FY 16: $24,850,000FY 17: $25,000,000FY 18: $25,000,000
Allocations
are per pupil and
are based on the count days of the previous school year
Average
per pupil allocation for SY 2015-2016: $1,137.45Average per pupil allocation for SY 2016-2017: $1,137.29Average per pupil allocation for SY 2017-2018: $1,123.29Slide6
Victory Schools and Allocations for 2017-2018 SY
District
School
Amount
School
AmountClarkBooker ES$561,645.00Monaco MS$1,511,948.34 Desert Rose HS$636,905.43Reid ES$25,835.67
Fitzgerald ES
$463,918.77
Smith MS
$1,154,742.12
Hollingsworth ES
$681,837.03
Snyder ES
$1,050,276.15
Innovations ES
$712,165.86
Sunrise Acres ES
$955,919.79
Jeffers ES
$953,673.21
Valley HS
$3,269,897.19
Kelly ES
$352,713.06
Vegas Verdes ES
$631,288.98
Lake ES
$921,097.80
West Prep Acad
$448,192.71
Long ES
$914,358.06
West Prep Sec
$1,591,701.93
Lowman ES
$1,025,563.77
Williams Wendell ES
$368,439.12
Manch
ES
$1,043,536.41
Woolley ES
$806,522.22
McCall ES
$454,932.45
Democracy Prep
Agassi ES
$523,453.14
Elko
Owyhee ES
$188,712.72
West Wendover MS
$180,849.69
Owyhee HS
$75,260.43
West Wendover ES
$650,384.91
Humboldt
McDermitt ES
$89,863.20
McDermitt
MS
$21,342.51
Nye
Amargosa Valley ES
$108,959.13
Washoe
Bailey Charter ES
$311,151.33
Hug HS
$1,641,126.69
Booth ES
$490,877.73
Natchez ES
$180,849.69Slide7
2016 & 2017 Smarter Balanced Proficiency Rates:Victory Schools Compared to Victory Control Schools
School Type
Subject
Victory
15-16
Victory 16-17TrendVictory Control 15-16Victory Control 16-17TrendESELA32.2633.13+0.8743.37
41.75
-1.62
ES
Math
25.19
27.5
+2.31
32.91
33.31
+0.4
MS
ELA
22.82
23.33
+0.51
47.11
44.29
-2.82
MS
Math
13.03
12.77
-0.26
22.17
20.23
-1.94Slide8
2016 & 2017 Smarter Balanced Proficiency Rates Graph:Victory Schools Compared to
Victory Control SchoolsSlide9
Increases in student achievement as measured by Smarter Balanced Assessments
School
2016 SBAC
ELA
Prof2017 SBAC ScoresELAGrowth from 2016 to 2017ELA2016 SBAC ScoresMath2017 SBAC ScoresMathGrowth from 2016 to 2017MathFitzgerald ES18.5%38.76%+20.2614.8%
23.03%
+8.23
Amargosa
Valley ES
27.9
44.44
+16.54
37.2
37.78
+.58
Sunrise Acres ES
32.7
44.09
+
12.02
38.1
42.41
+4.31
Woolley ES
41.8
51.99
+
10.19
30.6
39.07
+8.47
Williams, W. ES
13.4
21.93
+8.53
11.6
24.56
+12.96
Lowman ES
25.8
32.62
+6.82
17.1
27.3
+
10.2Slide10
Victory High School Data
School Name
2014 Grad
Rate
2015
Grad Rate2016Grad Rate (2016 state average: 73.55%)Trend2016 ACT mean score 2017 ACTmean score Trend2017 ACT State Averagemean score Valley HS66.06%68.98%72.76%+6.715.714.88-.8217.4Desert Rose HS57.55%16.88%14.11%-43.4412.213+.817.4Owyhee HS--63.16%(22 students)-14.12
17.4
Hug HS
73%
74%
73.61%
+.61
14.6
14.88
+.28
17.4Slide11
SBAC ELA: Victory School ResultsDifference in Proficiency Rates from 2016 to 2017Slide12
SBAC Math: Victory School ResultsDifference in Proficiency Rates from 2016 to 2017Slide13
Woolley Elementary - CCSDPrincipal: Dr. Darryl WyattParent/SOT Representative: Karina AlvaradoAchievement ResultsSBAC ELA
2016: 41.8% Proficient
2017: 51.99% Proficient (Gain +10.19%)
SBAC Math
2016: 30.6% Proficient
2017: 39.07% (Gain +8.47%)Slide14
Amargosa Valley Elementary - NyeSuperintendent: Dale Norton, Nye County SDFormer Principal: Mr. Robert WilliamsAchievement ResultsSBAC ELA2016: 27.9% Proficient2017: 44.44% Proficient (Gain +16.54%)
SBAC Math
2016: 37.2% Proficient
2017: 37.78% (Gain +0.58%)Slide15
Evidence-based interventions for Victory SchoolsTechnical assistance has and will continue to be provided to Victory districts and schools regarding ESSA’s evidence levels and criteria.Victory Schools are currently aligning their school performance plans and Victory strategies to programs and services with evidence-based interventions proven to show student improvement. To assist Victory Schools in selecting ESSA evidence-based programs and services, the NDE has shared the following resources:
EvidenceForESSA.org
WhatWorksclearninghouse.org
The Rand Corporation
Florida Research Center
Referred to support provider list from 1003a applicationNDE will also be produce guidance on evidence based strategies, programs, support providers, and instructional materials.Slide16
SBE Oversight Authority – Performance MeasuresAB 447 Sec 2.11(a): The SBE is to determine performance measures to improve student achievement.
NDE
recommends
aligning performance levels and outcome indicators to the ESSA Plan for
Victory schools.Slide17
Nevada’s State ESSA Plan Targets: Elementary SchoolsLong-term Goals and Measures of Interim Progress: Elementary School Smarter Balance Assessment
ELA
2016
2017
2018
2019202020212022All Students49.9%52.4%54.7%57.0%59.5%61.2%
63.1%
Economically
Disadvantaged
37.9%
41.0%
44.0%
46.8%
49.4%
51.9%
54.4%
Math
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
All Students
39.9%
42.9%
45.8%
48.5%
51.1%
53.5%
55.8%
Economically
Disadvantaged
28.8%
32.4%
35.7%
39.0%
42.0%
44.9%
47.7%Slide18
Nevada’s State ESSA Plan Targets: Middle SchoolsLong-term Goals and Measures of Interim Progress:Middle School Smarter Balance Assessment
ELA
2016
2017
2018
2019202020212022All Students46.4%49.1%51.7%54.1%56.4%58.6%60.6%Economically Disadvantaged35.1%38.3%41.4%
44.4%
47.1%
49.8%
52.3%
Math
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
All Students
26.0%
29.7%
33.2%
36.5%
39.7%
42.7%
45.6%
Economically
Disadvantaged
17.4%
21.5%
25.5%
29.2%
32.7%
36.1%
39.3%Slide19
SBE Oversight Authority – Corrective Action ProceduresAB 447 Sec 2.15The State Board shall require a Victory school
to take
corrective action if pupil achievement and
school performance
at the school are unsatisfactory, as
determined by the State Board. If unsatisfactory pupil achievement and school performance continue, the State Board may direct the Department to withhold any additional money that would otherwise be distributed pursuant to this section.NDE recommends the following corrective action for unsatisfactory performing Victory Schools:Identification of elementary and middle schools not meeting long term goals and measures of interim progress and not improving at a rate to meet long term goals and measures of interim progressNotification to school and districtRevision of school plan with NDE to implement partnership with evidence based support provider and other evidence based strategiesContinued unsatisfactory pupil achievement results in possible withholding of future Victory funds.Slide20
Recommended MotionAdopt Long Term Goals and Measures of Interim Progress for Economically Disadvantaged Students as performance measures to evaluate student achievement at Victory Schools.Adopt NDE’s recommendation for corrective action procedures:Identification of elementary and middle schools not meeting long term goals and measures of interim progress and not improving at a rate to meet long term goals and measures of interim progress
Notification
to school and district
Revision of school plan with NDE to implement partnership with evidence based support provider and other evidence based strategies
Continued unsatisfactory pupil achievement results in possible withholding of future Victory funds.