/
The Liar Paradox The Liar Paradox

The Liar Paradox - PowerPoint Presentation

lois-ondreau
lois-ondreau . @lois-ondreau
Follow
371 views
Uploaded On 2017-08-15

The Liar Paradox - PPT Presentation

The Liar 2 2 17 The Liar 2 2 17 The first sentence on this slide is false The Liar The first sentence on this slide is false Lets abbreviate the sentence on the last slide as L for liar ID: 579014

false true world sentence true false sentence world describes liar declarative possibility give principle disquotation bivalence excluded middle slide

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The Liar Paradox" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

The Liar ParadoxSlide2

The Liar

2 + 2 = 17Slide3

The Liar

2 + 2 = 17

The first sentence on this slide is false.Slide4

The Liar

The first sentence on this slide is false.Slide5

Let’s abbreviate the sentence on the last slide as ‘L’ for “liar”.

Let’s ask whether ‘L’ is true or not.Slide6

Possibility #1: ‘L’ is true.

A declarative sentence describes the way the world is.

If a sentence is true, then the world is the way it describes it.

‘L’ says that the world is this way: ‘L’ is false.

So ‘L’ is false.Slide7

Possibility #1: ‘L’ is true.

A declarative sentence describes the way the world is.

If a sentence is true, then the world is the way it describes it.

‘L’ says that the world is this way: ‘L’ is false.

So ‘L’ is false.Slide8

Disquotation Principle (1)

A declarative sentence describes the way the world is.

If a sentence is true, then the world is the way it describes it.

If ‘P’ is true, then P:

If “Today is Friday” is true, then today is Friday.

If “Michael is hungry” is true, then Michael is hungry.Slide9

Possibility #1: ‘L’ is true.

If ‘L’ is true, then L.

L = ‘L’ is false.

So ‘L’ is false.Slide10

Bivalence Principle

Every (declarative) sentence (that makes sense) has exactly one truth-value among these two: true, false. Slide11

Possibility #1: ‘L’ is true.

If ‘L’ is true, then L.

L = ‘L’ is false.

So ‘L’ is false.

Add in bivalence

 Contradiction!Slide12

Possibility #2: L is false.

A declarative sentence describes the way the world is.

If the world is the way a sentence describes it, then the sentence is true.

L says that the world is this way: L is false.

So L is true.Slide13

Disquotation Principle (2)

A declarative sentence describes the way the world is.

If the world is the way a sentence describes it, then the sentence is true.

If P, then ‘P’ is true.

If today is Friday, then ‘Today is Friday’ is true.

If Michael is hungry, then ‘Michael is hungry’ is true. Slide14

Possibility #2: ‘L’ is false.

If L, then ‘L’ is true.

‘L’ is false = L.

So ‘L’ is true.

Add in bivalence

 Contradiction!Slide15

The Strengthened LiarSlide16

Potential Solution: Deny Bivalence

Some things are neither true nor false:

Rocks

Trees

Questions

Meaningless declarative sentences

Perhaps the liar is in this category?Slide17

Potential Solution: Deny Bivalence

“What time is it?”

“This sentence is false.”

“Grass is green.”

“Dogs bark.”

“Snow is green.”

“Dogs moo.”

Neither

True

FalseSlide18

Problem: The Strengthened Liar

Liar sentence (L): The first sentence on this slide is false.

Strengthened Liar (L*): The second sentence on this slide is

not true

.Slide19

Possibility #1: L is true.

A declarative sentence describes the way the world is.

L says that the world is this way: L is not true.

If a sentence is true, then the world is the way it describes it.

So L is not true.

L is true and not true

 ContradictionSlide20

The Law of Excluded Middle

LEM: A or not-A

Everything is either blue or not blue.

Everything is either a dog or not a dog.

Everything is either true or not true.Slide21

The Law of Excluded Middle

“What time is it?”

“This sentence is false.”

“Grass is green.”

“Dogs bark.”

“Snow is green.”

“Dogs moo.”

True

Not TrueSlide22

Solutions

Give up excluded middle

Give up disjunction elimination

Give up

disquotation

Disallow self-reference

Accept that some contradictions are trueSlide23

1. Giving up Excluded Middle

The problem with giving up the Law of Excluded Middle is that it seems to collapse into endorsing contradictions:

“According to LEM, every sentence is either true or not true. I disagree: I think that some sentences are not true and not

not

true at the same time.”Slide24

2. Give up Disjunction Elimination

Basic logical principles are difficult to deny. What would a counterexample to disjunction elimination look like?

A or B

A implies C

B implies C

However,

not-CSlide25

3. Give up Disquotation

Principle

Giving up the

disquotation

principle

P = ‘P’ is true

Involves accepting that sometimes

P but ‘P’ is not true

or accepting that

not-P but ‘P’ is true

.Slide26

4. Disallow Self-Reference

The problem with disallowing self-reference is that self-reference isn’t essential to the paradox.

A: ‘B’ is true

B: ‘A’ is not trueSlide27

Circular Reference

A

B

‘B’ is true.

‘A’ is false.Slide28

Assume ‘A’ I

s True

A

B

‘B’ is true.

‘A’ is false.Slide29

Then ‘B’ Is Also True

A

B

‘B’ is true.

‘A’ is false.Slide30

But Then ‘A’ is False!

A

B

‘B’ is true.

‘A’ is false.Slide31

Assume ‘A’ Is False

A

B

‘B’ is true.

‘A’ is false.Slide32

Then ‘B’ Is Also False

A

B

‘B’ is true.

‘A’ is false.Slide33

But Then ‘A’ Is Also True

A

B

‘B’ is true.

‘A’ is false.