Distribution of Power Summary Classical Pluralism Power is widely distributed in modern democracies Parties pressure groups represent the interests of the people and compete for influence Multiple centres of power polyarchy ID: 368210
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "www.educationforum.co.uk" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
www.educationforum.co.uk
Distribution of Power SummarySlide2
Classical Pluralism
Power is widely distributed in modern democracies
Parties, pressure groups represent the interests of the people and compete for influence
Multiple centres of power – polyarchy (
RA Dahl
)
The State is the neutral arena for discussion and the neutral arbiter of disputes (
G Parry
)Slide3
Criticisms of Classical pluralism
Fails to consider second and third faces of power (
Lukes
)
Fails to appreciate the extent of the power of wealth and capital (Marxism)
Fails to recognise the unequal power of interest groups – polyarchy rather idealistic
Fails to consider ‘outsider’ groups – those deliberately placed outside of the decision making process because their views are challenging to those in authoritySlide4
Elite Pluralism
A response by pluralists to criticisms of classical pluralism
Elite pluralists recognise that some groups have more influence and access than others
Also recognise that pressure groups themselves are elitist in structure
Claim that pressure group elites still represent the views of the community on most issues
Claim that unrepresented groups e.g. The poor and ethnic minorities still get listened to because of the number of votes they command
Studies –
David Marsh
– identifies ‘policy communities’ surrounding big issues. Such communities are made up of insider AND outsider groups. The ordinary person’s voice is heard by decision makers through these policy communitiesSlide5
Classical Elite Theory
Claims that domination by elites is both desirable and inevitable
Mosca, Michels, Pareto
Pareto
– psychological characteristics – lions and foxes and the circulation of elites
Mosca
emphasised organisational abilities of elite members and suggested that different qualities were expected at different historical periods
Michels
– ‘iron law of oligarchy’ – all organisations necessarily and inevitably become elite dominated as a grow and gain influenceSlide6
The Power Elite
20
th
century variation on elite theory by
C
W
right Mills
Elite rule not necessarily inevitable but is the pattern for modern western countries
A ‘power elite’ has emerged in USA made up of national government, big business and the military – they inter marry, share a similar educational and social background and dominate decision making
EVIDENCE
- key political decisions like the dropping of the atom bomb on Hiroshima or recent invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan are made with virtually no consultation with the people
Mills sounds similar to Marxism BUT Marxists would argue real power comes from ownership of wealth not from membership of organisations
KEY QUESTION
– is there a power elite in the UK?Slide7
Elites in Britain – the Evidence
Stanworth and Giddens
(1974) found that the vast majority of the UK elite were recruited from fee paying schools and Oxford and
C
ambridge Universities
13 top Tories
currently in
government went to Eton
Feminist research suggests women are excluded from elite recruitment – only 143 of 650 MPs are women
Only 27 MPs are from ethnic minority backgrounds
Have major recent foreign policy decisions been made by a ‘power elite’ with no consultation with the people?
YES
–
I
raq war 2003 despite largest ever demonstration ever against such action
NO
–
S
yria – intervention favoured by PM Cameron but had to back down when Parliament voted againstSlide8
Marxism
Power is concentrated in hands of bourgeoisie and the State represents and protects their interests
Milliband
– instrumentalist – those who run the state share a common educational and social background and therefore promote the interests of capitalism
Poulantzas
– structuralist – the state is part of the ‘structure’ of capitalist society and will therefore act in the interests of capitalism regardless of the social background of who is in control. The State itself has a degree of relative autonomy and will always act in the long term interests of capitalism rather than short term interests of elite leaders
Gramsci
– hegemonic – emphasises the power of ideas in the power of the state – consent to an unjust system is manufactured through the ideological and cultural hegemony of the bourgeoisieSlide9
Criticisms of Marxism
The Ruling class no longer exists because of wider share ownership and property ownership – millions of people are ‘stakeholders’ in capitalism
Marxism has been criticised for being ‘reductionist’ – reducing every argument to class and wealth and ignoring important sociological themes such as gender and ethnicitySlide10
Postmodernism and Power
FOUCAULT
: Power resides in ‘discourses’ – ways of talking about things rather than from social structures (Foucault calls himself a post structuralist).
As discourses change so does power and how it is applied
Foucault Introduces the idea of ‘disciplinary power’ – the result of a new post modern discourse which seeks to control the human body and the human mind
Disciplinary power
is applied through judges, prison officers, psychiatrists etc. And seeks to ‘normalise’ deviant behaviour
Foucault emphasises the use of surveillance technology as mechanism of disciplinary powerSlide11
Criticisms of Foucault
Foucault gives no indication as to from where dominant discourses originate
Structuralists like Marxists would claim
discourses
reflect ideology
which in turn serves
the economic structure of societySlide12
Feminism
Patriarchy is central to understanding power in society – men are dominant women are subordinate
Studies –
Sylvia Walby
– 6 sources of male power – work, domestic work, culture, sexuality, violence and the sate
Much empirical evidence suggest women remain absent from top jobs are remain principle child carersSlide13
Review Each Lesson on this topic
Feminism
http://www.educationforum.co.uk/sociology_2/feminism.htm
Elite theory
http://www.educationforum.co.uk/sociology_2/elites.htm
Pluralism
http://www.educationforum.co.uk/sociology_2/plural.htm
Elite
pluralism
http://www.educationforum.co.uk/sociology_2/elitepluralism2.htm
Marxism
http://www.educationforum.co.uk/sociology_2/marxistpower.htmSlide14
Revision Guide
Read pages 148-149 – note any additional studies. Complete practice questions and practice exam question
Use white textbook for general reading