PPT-A quantum protocol for sampling correlated

equilibria unconditionally and without a mediator Iordanis Kerenidis LIAFA Univ Paris 7 and CNRS Shengyu Zhang The Chinese University of Hong Kong Normalform games. Michael Ben-Or. The Hebrew University. Michael Rabin’s Birthday Celebration. Randomized Protocols. Power of Randomization. Exponential . speedup for known algorithms. Complexity . – The jury is still out . Omar Fawzi (ETH Zürich. ). Joint work with . Frédéric. . Dupuis (Aarhus University) . and . Stephanie . Wehner. (CQT, Singapore. ). arXiv:1305.1316. Process. Uncertainty relation game. Choose n-. Dieter Jaksch. Outline. Lecture 1: Introduction. What defines a quantum simulator? Quantum simulator criteria. Strongly correlated quantum systems.. Lecture 2: Optical lattices. Bose-Einstein condensation, adiabatic loading of an optical lattice. Andris AmBAINIS (UNIV. OF LATVIA). Forrelation. : A Problem that Optimally Separates Quantum from Classical Computing. Quantum vs. classical. 1 query quantumly. How many queries . classically?. Total vs. partial functions. AmBAINIS. UNIVERSITY OF LATVIA. Quantum algorithms vs. polynomials and the maximum quantum-classical gap in the query model. Query model. Function f(x. 1. , ..., x. N. ), x. i. . {0,1}.. x. i. given by a black box:. Seyed. Ali . Hosseini. . Lavasani. . Seyed. . Alireza. . Seif. . Tabrizi. B92 Protocol . Let . and . be two distinct, . nonorthogonal. states, and let . and . be projection operators onto subspaces orthogonal to . Meng Yang. Phonetics Seminar. March 7, 2016. The Plan. Background: . C. ue weighting and cue shifting. Theories and predictions. My research questions. Methods (brace yourselves…). Results (yay!). Discussion. (. UT Austin. ). SQuInT. , Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Feb. 25, 2017. Joint work with . Lijie. Chen (Tsinghua). arXiv:1612.05903. Quantum Supremacy. QSamp. Samp. #1 Application of QC: Disprove the QC skeptics (and the Extended Church-Turing Thesis)!. A. ndris . Ambainis. Uni. v. ersity. . of. . Latvia. Joint . w. o. r. k with:. . Scott Aaronson, . Kaspars. . Balodi. s. ,. Aleksandrs Belovs, . T. r. o. y Le. e. , . Miklos . Santha. , . and . J. (. UT Austin. ). Caltech Physics Colloquium, February 9, . 2017. Joint work with . Lijie. Chen (. Tsinghua). arXiv:1612.05903. Quantum Supremacy. QSamp. Samp. #1 Application of QC: Disprove the QC skeptics (and the Extended Church-Turing Thesis)!. Meng Yang. Phonetics Seminar. March 7, 2016. The Plan. Background: . C. ue weighting and cue shifting. Theories and predictions. My research questions. Methods (brace yourselves…). Results (yay!). Discussion. A tour through models, interpretations, analogies, and laws . Gil Kalai. Einstein Institute of Mathematics. Hebrew University of Jerusalem. ICM 2018, beautiful Rio. Outline: two puzzles, four parts, six theorems, eight models. 1. Attributes of Common Cause Variation. It is the variation inherent to a Process.. It cannot be reduced unless one changes the Process.. It can be considered to be the background noise present in a Process.. 1. Ph. /CS 219A. Quantum Computation. Lecture . 6. Bell Inequalities. Today we start a new topic. We will explore more deeply how quantum correlations are different from classical ones.. Two parties in different laboratories who share quantum entanglement, but are unable to communicate, can perform tasks which would be impossible without the shared entanglement. .