Empire amp Aftermath February 2017 Introduction Economic development a term used frequently in 20th century by economists policymakers intellectuals Concept has a longer history connected to ideas about modernisation industrialisation westernisation ID: 623457
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Colonial and Post-Colonial Development" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Colonial and Post-Colonial Development
Empire & Aftermath
February 2017Slide2
Introduction
Economic
development
– a term used frequently in 20th century by economists, policymakers, intellectuals. Concept has a longer history, connected to ideas about modernisation, industrialisation, westernisation.‘Development’ usually refers to policy interventions and aid projects that focus on alleviating poverty and improving living conditions in the global SouthThis lecture provides a historical overview of international development, from the late colonial era to the present day.Development never a straightforward benevolent act, but a historically contingent and politically/ideologically driven projectSlide3
Development Aid
Development
Aid
(development assistance, technical assistance, international aid, overseas aid, official development assistance (ODA), foreign aid)Financial aid given by governments and other agencies to support the economic, environmental, social, and political development of developing countriesDistinguished from humanitarian aid by focusing on alleviating poverty in the long-term
Bilateral (70%) and Multilateral (30%)80-85% of global development aid comes from governments as official development assistance (ODA). $135 billion total ODA in 2014
Remaining 15-20% comes from private sources:
non-governmental organisations (NGOs),
foundations, remittances, etc
.Slide4Slide5Slide6
Global Poverty
In 2010, were an estimated 1.2 billion people living under the extreme poverty line ($1.25/day), 2.3 billion people under the poverty line ($2/day)
800 million people go hungry every night
19,000 children die each day from preventable health problemsMore than 58 million primary-age children do not attend schoolEvery day, billions experience extreme forms of deprivationGlobal poverty concentrated in South Asia and sub-Saharan AfricaSlide7Slide8Slide9
Development Aid
Aid projects
Budget support (payments to recipient government's general or sectoral budget)
Technical assistance (expertise)Debt reliefClimate changeAt different times, different forms of aid have been have been judged most conducive to successful development. Budget support currently growing in importanceInternational community subscribes to poverty reduction as the overarching purpose of aid. In practice, political and security considerations have always shaped aid allocationsSlide10
History of Development
Late colonial era
Post-1945: Truman’s Point IV
1960s: The Development Decade1970s: Reorientation1980s: The ‘Lost Decade’1990s: Washington Consensus2000s: Millennium Development GoalsSlide11
Colonial Origins
Ideas about
‘improvement’
of colonial territories and people have long history in European imperialism, and in Western thought as a whole (Enlightenment, modernity)Late 19th century ‘new imperialism’: more aggressive colonial policies of Britain, Belgium, France, Germany, Netherlands. More importance attached to science and technology, new possibilities of state planning, more systematic development of coloniesDevelopment a response to problems and disorder generated by late colonial rule (Great Depression, fears of environmental and population crisis). Helped reinvigorate imperial
missionBritain’s Colonial Development Act (1929), Colonial Development and Welfare Act (1940) – ushered in era of state-led, large-scale development projects
Late colonial development
largely failed
... but left important
legaciesSlide12
Colonial Origins: The Kariba Dam
Kariba Dam
:
hydroelectric dam in the Kariba Gorge of the Zambezi river basin between Zambia and Zimbabwe Built by Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland in 1950s. Huge project to dam the Zambezi and provide hydroelectric power to surrounding region40% of colonial state's GNP to complete, required submergence of 57,000 local homesCombined many key elements of late colonial development ideology:
grand scale, new technology, desire for industrialisation, modern aesthetics and materials, technological fix to perceived population crisis, sacrifice of indigenous lands/ways of life, reaffirm white European
rule and dampen African nationalismSlide13
Post-1945: Truman’s Point IV
Marshall Plan,
1948:
Reconstruction of Europe. US gave $12bn to rebuild European economies ($120bn in 2016 value)President Truman's 1949 Inaugural Address, Point IV: “we must embark on a bold new program for making the benefits of our scientific advances and industrial progress available for the improvement and growth of underdeveloped areas”‘Underdevelopment’ a new worldview. ‘Developed/underdeveloped’ distinction more attuned to post-war world than
‘coloniser/colonised’Economic growth equated with successful development. Industrialisation the engine of
growth, measured in gross domestic product (GDP)
Development aid already linked to security objectives of
the United
States: weapon to address
the threat
of
communism.
Share
US expertise, help
‘third world’
nations to develop, raise standard of living, show that
democracy
and capitalism could provide for the welfare of the individualSlide14
1960s: The UN Development Decade
The UN ‘Development Decade’ – zeal and optimism to improve living standards and eradicate poverty
Modernisation
theory and Walt Rostow's 5 stages of growth(traditional society; preconditions for take-off; take-off; drive to maturity, age of high mass consumption)Impressive growth rates, dramatic improvements in
life expectancy, treatment of disease, education, health, infant mortalityGreen Revolution
huge
increases in global agricultural
production which
peaked
in 1960s:
HYV cereal grains, irrigation, modernisation, hybridized seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, etc
.
Many
disappointments by end of 1960s:
hunger, malnutrition, unemployment, inequality, living standardsSlide15
1970s: Reorientation
Growing dissatisfaction with orthodox development model
Calls for re-examination and re-orientation: new focus on poverty reduction, grassroots projects, ‘basic needs’
Shift away from investment projects in power, transport, telecommunications >> agriculture, rural development, social services, direct interventions to benefit the poorest groupsOPEC oil ‘shock’, Oct 1973 – Mar 1974New International Economic Order, 1974 – the ‘revolt of the third world’?Slide16Slide17
1980s: The ‘Lost Decade’
Debt crisis
Causes: sharp rise in oil prices;
big decline in foreign demand for exports; decreasing primary product prices; rising international interest rates. Commercial banks flushed with OPEC deposits, eager to recycle as loans to third worldSolutions: devised by creditor countries, banks, global financial institutions. In return for debt rescheduling/cancellation, indebted countries had to pursue set of policies under IMF supervision (structural adjustment)Reduce public spending; increase revenue; currency devaluation; removal of price
controlsSlide18Slide19
1980s: The ‘Lost Decade’
Part
of broader shift to neoliberal
ideology and governance: objectives of poverty reduction/growth best served by relying on market forces and private enterprise. Restrict the role of the state.The ‘lost decade’ – stagnation, decreasing output, unemployment, falling wages, reduced public spending on social services, aggravation of poverty, growing inequalityAid becomes a stop-gap to salvage shaky international financial system: service debt, stay afloat, implement adjustment
Vocal criticism of aid in many donor countries, attempts to privatise and outsource to NGOsSlide20
The Rise of Development NGOs
Non-governmental organisations (
NGOs)
non-profit, non-state, non-violent, organised on local/national/international level to address issues in support of public goodDevelopment NGOs championed as having ‘comparative advantage’ from 1970s onwards - efficient, experts, less bureaucratic, more adept at reaching poorest communities‘Pro-NGO norm’ in development arena from 1980s – NGOs promoted as more efficient and cost-effective service providers, part of shift to
neoliberalismIncreasing amounts of official aid channelled through NGOs: now central actors in aid systemSlide21
Cumulated income (£m) of British Red Cross, Christian Aid, Oxfam and Save the Children, 1945-2009 (adjusted for inflation, 2009)Slide22
1990s: The Washington Consensus
Economic ‘Shock therapy’
in former Soviet bloc
nations after the Cold War ends: sudden release of price and currency controls, withdrawal of state subsidies, trade liberalisation, privatisation of state assets. Applied to post-communist states with mixed resultsWashington Consensus: standard reform package by Washington based institutions (WB, IMF, UST)cut public spending; currency devaluation; liberalisation of trade and foreign investment; privatisation; deregulation
Neoliberal model challenged but not overturned, renewed focus on poverty reduction as primary goal of development aid in broad sense (health, education, employment, access to public services) by end of 1990sSlide23
21st
Century: UN Millennium Development Goals
UN Millennium
Development Goals8 international development goals adopted by the UN in 2000. Embodies poverty reduction norm. All member states committed to achieve by 2015: 1: Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger
2: Achieve universal primary education 3: Promote gender equality and empower women
4
: Reduce child
mortality
5
: Improve maternal
health
6
: Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria, other
diseases
7
: Ensure environmental
sustainability
8
: Develop a global partnership for development
Uneven progress: success in some areas more than others, varying results across regions
Post-2001 War
on Terror:
Development aid
still linked
to
foreign policy and security
objectives.Slide24
21st
Century: Post-2015
UN
Millennium Development Goals replaced by UN Sustainable Development Goals - adopted September 2015. 17 Sustainable Development Goals, to be achieved by 2030More
complex and inclusive process than MDGs. Recognise that eliminating poverty will also require reducing inequality, combatting climate change, strengthening labour rights, etc.Also contradictory – old
model of ever-increasing industrial growth
to
fuel developmentSlide25
Critiques & Alternative Visions
Soviet communist model of
development
central planning, one-party state, nationalisation, rapid industrialisation. Centrally planned economies considered an attractive model by many in the Global South. Ensured full employment but with low productivityDependency theoryRejection of modernisation theory, popular in the 1970s, argues resources flow from a ‘periphery’
of poor and underdeveloped states to a ‘core’ of wealthy states (neo-colonialism)Alternative models: grassroots, small-scale, appropriate technologyPost-Development
theory
Argues
the entire concept and practice of development is Eurocentric, unsustainable, ineffective, unjust, and a reflection of Western hegemony.Slide26
Conclusion: Questions to Consider
Imperial
legacies and continuities
The Development ‘Industry’Rise of non-Western ‘emerging donors’. China: aid to Africa an important part of ‘soft power’Does aid actually work? “Foreign aid is... a phenomenal investment. Foreign aid doesn't just save lives; it also lays the
groundwork for lasting, long-term economic progress” (Bill Gates, 2014)
“Giving
more aid than we currently give
– at least
if
it were
given as it is given
now – would make
things
worse
, not
better”
(
Angus Deaton, 2013)Slide27Slide28Slide29Slide30
Development in Reverse
Statistics show poverty rates declining due to Millennium Development Goals: successful aid, or false accounting?
Rich nations provide
over $100 billion annually in aid. But much more flows in other direction: debt servicing, capital flight, tax avoidance, cheap labour, patent fees, etc. Poor countries actually ‘developing’ rich countries?Jason Hickel: We will never successfully
eradicate global poverty until we dismantle the ‘global wealth extraction system’, prevent capital flight and tax avoidance, cancel debt, halt land grabs, democratise global economic institutions,
and renegotiate all ‘free trade’ deals.
Convincing, or utopian?