/
Community College Funding: How it works and why it matters Community College Funding: How it works and why it matters

Community College Funding: How it works and why it matters - PowerPoint Presentation

luanne-stotts
luanne-stotts . @luanne-stotts
Follow
349 views
Uploaded On 2018-11-03

Community College Funding: How it works and why it matters - PPT Presentation

California Community College Leadership Academy 3CLA September 21 2017 Kathy Blackwood Executive Vice Chancellor San Mateo County Community College District Student Learning Outcomes SLOs Acquire better understanding of ID: 712533

budget fund community funding fund budget funding community college state california student ftes funds 000 district revenue general year

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Community College Funding: How it works ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Community College Funding: How it works and why it matters

California Community College Leadership Academy (3CLA)

September 21, 2017

Kathy Blackwood, Executive Vice Chancellor, San Mateo County Community College DistrictSlide2

Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs)

Acquire better understanding of:

How K-14 education is funded in California

How CCC districts are funded

Acquire a working knowledge of:

The basics of FTES/WSCH

The very basics of fund accounting and the BAM

Where to look for CCC fiscal information

Understand where we’re going from here:

New initiatives: Strong Workforce, Guided Pathways, Promise Programs

New funding formulaSlide3

California Public Education Structure

University of California (UC)

California State University (CSU)

K-14 education in California

Proposition 98 – passed in Nov. 1988

K-12, the big dog – why?Community collegesPolitical strengths/Political weaknessesProp 98 “share”Slide4

California Community Colleges

2016-2017

How many districts?

72

How many colleges?

114Newest –

Compton College

How many centers?

76+

Grandfathered - 37

State Approved - 39

Newest – Rancho Cordoba Education Center

Los Rios CCD

March 2016Slide5

California Community Colleges2017-2018

Total

system-wide budget

Approximately $7

billion

Community Supported (Basic Aid) DistrictsHow can you tell they’re community supported? Aren’t we all?Nine districts as of P2 2016-2017

Mira

Costa, South Orange, Marin, San Mateo, San Jose-Evergreen and West

Valley-Mission

In as of 16/17 (P2) – Napa College, San Luis Obispo, Sierra College

But they were in at 15/16 P2 and out by 15/16

RecalcSlide6

Funding Rates

2016-2017

UC -

$26,391

270,000

students10 collegesCSU - $14,723480,000

students

23 colleges

K-12 -

$11,601

6,227,000 students

10,453 schools

CCC - $7,949*2,127,000 students1,186,000 FTES* - includes state GF, property taxes, student fee revenue and unrestricted lottery funds – source CCLCSlide7

Review of the CCCCO Organization

Structure –

BOG

1102 Q Street

Appointments

State AgencyNew Chancellor!Eloy Ortiz Oakley of LBCC

Power compared to UC & CSU?

Governance StructuresSlide8

How California Funds K-14 Education

Proposition 98

Passed by voters in November 1988

K-14 receives a share of state

revenues

collectedMinimum funding guaranteed by formulaThree “tests”Community college system receives

approximately

11% share of Prop 98 revenues

Minimum guarantee percentage of Prop 98 -10.92%

However, not a guarantee…

Legislature can suspend to fund at a lower level

Minimum guarantee has also become maximum guarantee

Funding follows state economyWhen economy is good, increases in fundingWhen economy is poor, decreases in fundingWhat’s wrong with this reality for our colleges and students?Slide9

How the CCCCO Funds the Districts

Unrestricted General Fund

Principal Apportionment process – Exhibit C

Becomes Exhibit E once final recalculated certification (R1)

Eight months after close of fiscal year (Feb P1)

SB361 Funding Allocation Model - 2006Replaced Program Based Funding from AB1725Differences of SB361 methodology compared to Program Based Funding formula

Other CC District source of Funds

Categorical program entitlements (SSSP, DSPS, Student Equity, BFAP),competitive grants, regional grants (SBDC), regional collaborative (adult ed), Economic Development, special purpose funds, etc.

More often based on FTES counts and students served

counts as well as Pell grants, unemployment, etc.Slide10

SB361 Funding Formula

Equalized

FTES

marginal

funding ratesCredit FTES - $5,151.24 (17/18)6 districts grandfathered base rate is higherEx.- West Kern = $6,766,65/cr. FTESNon-credit - $3,097,58 (17/18)

Career Development/College Prep – CDCP - $5,151.24 (17/18)

Old “non-credit enhanced”

Now equalized with credit rate

Base Allocations for colleges and centers based on size

Acknowledges economies of scale

Minimum level of service to operate a college

Acknowledges rural (small) district funding need/supportSlide11

SB361 Funding Formula Challenges

Large recent state investment in specialized programs

Categorically funded

That’s great for our targeted student needs

Declining support for core funding for unrestricted general funds

Cost of Living Allowance (COLA)Growth/Access (earned)

Base Augmentations

Budget

c

hallenges for district’s unrestricted general funds due to state primarily investing new Prop 98 funds for CC’s in new Categorical Programs

Small or no COLAs in the foreseeable future

Implicit Price Deflator formula

New Growth/Access ModelConstrains many districts to miniscule growth opportunities regardless of unfunded FTES and actually serving more studentsSlide12

What are budgets?

Authorization to spend

Approved by Board of Trustees

Estimate of revenues and expenditures

Salaries & benefits

Other expensesAllocation of resourcesSlide13

What are Budgets?

Maximum amount that can be spent in a major classification

Transfers and revisions must be approved by a 2/3 majority of the board

This includes transfers from contingency

Title V 58307Slide14

Budget Calendar

On or before the 15th day of September of each year the governing board of each community college district shall prepare and keep on file for public inspection a statement of all receipts and expenditures of the district for the preceding fiscal year and a statement of the estimated total expenses for the district for the current fiscal year.

Title V 58300Slide15

Budget Calendar

Jan. 10: Governor’s Budget

May 15: Revised Governor’s Budget

June 30: District Tentative Budget

June 30: State Budget

Sept 15: District Final BudgetSlide16

Common Budget Builders

COLA

Deficit factor

Growth/Decline in FTES (impacts categorical, lottery, and

adjunct

budget)InterestLottery

Compensation settlements

Productivity

Benefits

Utilities

Supplies/equipment

Other operating

Reserves for contingencySlide17

Common Differences

Redevelopment funds

Bonds/other debt

Contract education

Leased space revenue

Farms/other industriesCapital constructionDebt paymentsContract instruction

Leased space costs

Golden HandshakesSlide18

Budget Cuts

Personnel:

Hiring freeze

Managed hiring

No OT/Comp time

Productivity/GrowthIncrease class sizeGrow – where?Eliminate low performing programs

Operations

Utilities

Conference/travel

Renegotiate contracts

Increase revenue

What are you no longer going to do?Slide19

Building Blocks: Adjunct Budget

Definition of FTES

One Full Time Equivalent Student is defined as 525 contact hours over an academic year

An academic year is defined as 35 weeks

525 hours per year / 35 weeks per year means that a FT student is in class 15 hours a week

One Weekly Student Contact Hour (WSCH) is one student in class one hour per week for 35 weeks Slide20

Building Blocks: Adjunct Budget

Definition of

Productivity or Load

– Weekly Student Contact Hours per Full Time Equivalent

Faculty (some use FTES/FTEF)

One full time faculty teaching 15 hours per week with 35 students in each class is generating 525 WSCH/FTEFSlide21

Projecting Costs

16/17 Hourly teaching budget development model

FTES

WSCH

Prod Target

FTEF Needed

FT FTE Available

Hourly FTE Needed

Average Cost per FTE

Budget Needed

6,867

103,005

500

206.01

118.67

87.35

$62,885

$5,492,747 Slide22

Communicating

FTES

WSCH

Prod

Target

FTEF Needed

FT FTE Available

Hourly FTE Needed

Average Cost per FTE

Budget Needed

6,867

103,005

500

206.01

118.67

87.35

$62,885

$5,492,747

6,867

103,005

510

201.97

118.67

83.31

$62,885

$5,238,727

6,867

103,005

525

196.20

118.67

77.54

$62,885

$4,875,842

6,867

103,005

490

210.22

118.67

91.55

$62,885

$5,757,134

6,867

103,005

480

214.59

118.67

95.93

$62,885

$6,032,538 Slide23

Communicating = Changing

What is the difference between 525 and 535?

525 WSCH per FTEF is a class size of 35.

535 WSCH per FTEF is a class size of 35 ⅔.

Take 1 more student -- NO!!Slide24

Communicating = Changing

SIMPLY KEEP EVERY STUDENT THAT SHOWS UP ON THE FIRST DAY OF CLASSES!Slide25

Budget and Accounting Manual (BAM) Basics

You need to know the basics of Fund Accounting (the BAM) to

Read and understand the CCFS 311

Understand district account

codes

Chart of accountsThe BasicsFundProgram – source of fundsActivity – where spent

Object – for what?Slide26

BAM Fund Accounting

General Fund

Unrestricted

Restricted

Special Revenue Fund

Child Care CentersParcel TaxCapital Projects FundGeneral Obligation BondsScheduled MaintenanceDebt Service

Payment for General Obligation Bonds

Enterprise Fund

Bookstore, Cafeteria, Fitness Center, Copy Shop, Farm, etc.

Internal Service Fund

Self-Insurance

Trust Funds

Financial AidStudent BodySlide27

Fund

2017-18 Budget

% of Total

Unrestricted General Fund

$177,330,818

42.58%

Restricted General Fund

48,185,039

11.57%

Child Development Fund

1,269,697

0.30%

Capital Projects Fund

98,296,552

23.60%

Debt Service Fund

54,369,200

13.05%

Bookstore Fund

7,693,000

1.85%

Cafeteria Fund

289,000

0.07%

San Mateo Athletic Club (SMAC)

3,940,000

0.95%

Community, Continuing, and Corp Ed

1,391,000

0.33%

Self-Insurance Fund

1,566,330

0.38%

Trust Funds (Financial Aid)

17,942,178

4.31%

Reserve for Post-Retirement Benefits

4,200,000

1.01%

TOTAL

$416,472,814

100.00%Slide28

Unrestricted General Fund

Revenue

1

Federal Revenue

0

2

State Revenue

9,927,904

3

Local Revenue

167,402,914

4

Total Revenue

177,330,818 Slide29

Expenses

5

Cost of Sales

0

6

Certificated Salaries

71,177,060

7

Classified Salaries

38,719,695

8

Employee Benefits

41,477,136

9

Materials & Supplies

7,777,026

10

Operating Expenses

23,857,604

11

Capital Outlay

385,042

12

Total Expenses

183,393,563 Slide30

Transfers & Other

13

Transfers In

0

14

Other Sources

0

15

Transfers out

(4,683,407)

16

Contingency/Deficit

(83,627)

17

Other Out Go

0

18

Total Transfers/Other

(4,767,034)

Fund Balance

19

Net Change in Fund Balance

(10,829,780)

20

Beginning Balance, July 1

33,882,785

21

Adjustments to Beginning Balance

0

22

Net Fund Balance, 6/30

23,053,006 Slide31

Where to Find Additional Budget and Fiscal Information

Chancellor’s Office Website

cccco.edu

Community College League of California

ccleague.org

Association of California Community College Administrators accca.orgAssociation of Chief Business Officials acbo.org

Academic Senate for California Community Colleges (glossary)

asccc.org/glossary

Calif. Dept.

of

Finance (state budget)

ebudget.ca.govSlide32

New Inititatives

Guided Pathways:

$150M - $15M goes to the CO off the top

Remainder takes each college from where they are to the next step in implementing the pathways

Strong Workforce:

CTE fundingBased regionallyIntegrated Planning:Basic Skills, Equity and SSSP funding to be integratedSlide33

New Funding Formula

Chancellor’s Task Force on Fiscal Affairs

Same group (more or less) developed SB361 10 years ago

Looking at outcomes based funding

Reviewing other state models – successes and failures

Proposal will be vetted through state governance processesSlide34

Questions?

Kathy Blackwood blackwoodk@smccd.edu