Advantage 1 Chapter 9 Acquisition and Restructuring Strategies PART III CREATING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE The Strategic Management Process Merger and Acquisition Strategies Very popular strategies ID: 462049
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Competing for" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Competing for Advantage
1
Chapter 9Acquisition and Restructuring Strategies
PART III
CREATING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGESlide2
The Strategic Management ProcessSlide3
Merger and Acquisition StrategiesVery popular strategiesEspecially cross-border acquisitionsOffensive and defensive motives ProblematicHigh failure rates
Complex strategic decisionsImpacted by economic volatility Uncertain returns Slide4
Mergers, Acquisitions, and Takeovers – The DifferencesKey TermsMerger Strategy through which two firms agree to integrate their operations on a relatively co-equal basis
Acquisition Strategy through which one firm buys a controlling, 100 percent interest in another firm with the intent of making the acquired firm a subsidiary business within its
portfolio or melding it with another divisionSlide5
Mergers, Acquisitions, and Takeovers – The DifferencesKey TermsTakeover Special type of acquisition strategy wherein the target firm did not solicit the acquiring firm's bidHostile takeover
Unfriendly takeover strategy that is unexpected and undesired by the target firmSlide6Reasons for Acquisitions Slide7
Sources of Market PowerSize of the firmResources and capabilities to compete in the marketShare of the marketSlide8
Types of Acquisitions to Increase Market PowerHorizontal Acquisitions Vertical AcquisitionsRelated AcquisitionsSlide9
Horizontal Acquisitions Acquisition of a company competing in the same industryIncrease market power by exploiting cost-based and revenue-based synergiesCharacter similarities between the firms lead to smoother integration and higher performanceSlide10
Vertical AcquisitionsAcquisition of a supplier or distributor of one or more products or servicesIncrease market power by controlling more of the value chainSlide11
Related AcquisitionsAcquisition of a firm in a highly related industryIncrease market power by leveraging core competencies to gain a competitive advantageSlide12
Entry Barriers that
Acquisitions Overcome
Economies of scale in established competitorsDifferentiated competitor products Enduring relationships and product loyalties between customers and competitorsSlide13
Cross-Border AcquisitionsAcquisitions made between companies with headquarters in different countriesSlide14
New Product DevelopmentSignificant investments of a firm’s resources are required to:develop new products internallyintroduce new products into the marketplaceProfitability or adequate returns on investments are not certainSlide15
Increase Speed to MarketAcquisitions are used for rapid market entry critical to successful competition in the highly uncertain and complex global environment faced by firms today. Slide16
Reshape the Firm’s Competitive ScopeAcquisitions quickly and easily:Change a firm's portfolio of businessesEstablish new lines of products in markets where the firm lacks experience
Alter the scope of a firm’s activitiesCreate strategic flexibilitySlide17
Learn and Develop New CapabilitiesAcquisitions are used to:Gain capabilities that the firm does not possessBroaden the firm’s knowledge base
Reduce inertiaSlide18
Problems in Achieving Acquisition SuccessSlide19Integration Challenges
Melding two disparate corporate culturesWorking relationshipsFinancial and control systemsUncertainty for acquired firm’s employees Retaining crucial knowledge held by key personnel
Merging acquired capabilities into internal processes and proceduresSlide20Private Synergy
Occurs when the combination and integration of acquiring and acquired firms' assets yields capabilities and core competencies that could not be developed by combining and integrating the assets of any other companies.Possible when the two firms' assets are complimentary in unique ways.Yields a competitive advantage that is difficult to understand or imitate.Slide21
Transaction CostsDirect expensesLegal fees Charges from investment bankers who complete due diligenceIndirect expenses
Managerial time to evaluate target firms and complete negotiations
Loss of key managers after an acquisitionAdditional costs Managerial time in meetingsResources used to integrate processesSlide22
Due DiligenceProcess through which a potential acquirer evaluates a target firm for acquisitionAssociates the purchase price of an acquisition to an estimated, realistic achievable valueSlide23Large or Extraordinary Debt
Increases the likelihood of bankruptcyCan lower the firm’s credit ratingPrecludes needed investments
in activities that contribute to long-term success (opportunity costs)Slide24Too Much Diversification
Overwhelming information processing requirementsOveruse of financial controls to evaluate unit performanceDecline in internal innovation Slide25
Management Acquisition ActivitiesSearching for viable acquisition candidatesCompleting effective due-diligence processes
Preparing and conducting negotiationsManaging integration processes
after acquisition is completedSlide26
Firm Becomes Too LargeKey TermsBureaucratic controls Formalized supervisory and behavioral rules and policies designed to ensure decision and action consistency across different units of a
firmSlide27
Attributes and Results of Successful Acquisitions Slide28
RestructuringKey TermsRestructuring Strategy through which a firm changes its set of businesses or financial structureSlide29
Restructuring –Three StrategiesDownsizingDownscopingLeveraged Buyouts Slide30
DownsizingKey TermsDownsizing Strategy that involves a reduction in the number of a firm's employees (and sometimes in the number of operating units) that may or may not change the composition of businesses in the company's portfolioSlide31
DownscopingKey TermsDownscoping Strategy of eliminating businesses that are unrelated to a firm's core businesses through divesture, spin-off, or some other meansSlide32
Leveraged BuyoutsKey TermsLeveraged buyouts (LBOs) Restructuring strategy whereby a party buys all of a firm's assets in order to take the firm private (or no
longer trade the firm's shares publicly)Private equity firms
Firms that facilitate or engage in taking public firms or business units of public firms privateSlide33
Characteristics of Leveraged BuyoutsHigh debtSignificant riskRelated downscopingManagerial incentivesSlide34
Restructuring and OutcomesSlide35
Ethical Question What are the ethical issues associated with takeovers, if any? Are mergers more or less ethical than takeovers? Why or why not?Slide36
Ethical Question One of the outcomes associated with market power is that the firm is able to sell its good or service above competitive levels. Is it ethical for firms to pursue market power? Does your answer to this question differ by the industry in which the firm competes?
For example, are the ethics of pursuing market power different for firms producing and selling medical equipment compared with those producing and selling sports clothing?Slide37
Ethical Question What ethical considerations are associated with downsizing decisions? If you were part of a corporate downsizing, would you feel that your firm had acted unethically? If you believe that downsizing has an unethical component to it, what should firms do to avoid using this technique?Slide38
Ethical Question What ethical issues are involved with conducting a robust due-diligence process?Slide39
Ethical Question Some evidence suggests that there is a direct relationship between a firm’s size and the level of compensation its top executives receive. If this is so, what inducement does this relationship provide to top-level managers? What can be done to influence this relationship so that it serves shareholders’ best interests?