/
Measurement Systems Analysis Measurement Systems Analysis

Measurement Systems Analysis - PowerPoint Presentation

luanne-stotts
luanne-stotts . @luanne-stotts
Follow
564 views
Uploaded On 2017-10-07

Measurement Systems Analysis - PPT Presentation

Six Sigma Foundations Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity Key Learning Points Data Needs to be Verifiable Reliable Correct Stakeholders Believe Data AGENDA What is Measurement Systems Analysis ID: 593898

time measurement system amp measurement time amp system delivery farm operator systems analysis data attribute sigma repeatability process part

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Measurement Systems Analysis" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Measurement Systems Analysis

Six Sigma FoundationsContinuous Improvement Training

Six Sigma SimplicitySlide2

Key Learning Points

Data Needs to be:Verifiable

Reliable

Correct

Stakeholders Believe Data Slide3

AGENDA

What is Measurement Systems Analysis

?

Reproducibility and Repeatability

SummarySlide4

What is measurement systems analysis

Whatever it takes to ensure that measurements are reliable and credibleAnticipate ‘doubting Thomas’ and share the pre-checks on your measurementsSlide5

Measurement Systems Analysis– Terms

Repeatability

Chance that same

person (operator)

and process will give consistent measurement

Reproducibility

Chance that different

person (operator)

will give consistent measurement

Attribute

Qualitative e.g. Pass/Fail, Hot/Cold, Employee name, work order number

Variable

Quantitative Numbers, % Pass, Cost, Cycle TimeSlide6

MSA - Who should create it

Process owner/team guided by Black or Green Belt Quality group

May be part of Quality Management System (QMS)Slide7

Exercise

12 months ago you agreed to the installation of a $1Million MRP software package with the aim of improving on time delivery

Now a sister plant is looking at introducing a different package to solve the same problem

The reason that they give for using a different package is because they say that your attempt to improve delivery failed

They quote the data shown on the next graph.Slide8

MRP system ‘improvement’Slide9

MRP System An Answer

Comparing the data from before and after there is no relationship between the month of the year and the on time deliverySlide10

Before the MRP system there was more spread than afterwards

After the system introduction the average on time delivery fellBut difference is small 1.2/88 (delta/sigma) and we only had monthly figures!

Because of our measurement system we would be unwise to assume that the observed sample average (before and after) is an accurate prediction of future on time deliverySlide11

Sample Rates

It is unsafe to say whether the project worked or not because the

project

to introduce the system was poorly set up!!

In future the Green belt should check

The source of the data

The speed and size of sampling

The rate of changes you introduce elsewhere which may have a

domino effect

The delta sigma of improvement you want to seeSlide12

Noise

Was on-time delivery the right thing to try and change?If ‘

it depends’

on many factors such as:

order clauses, customers, capacity, changing volumes of orders, seasonal delivery demands and backlog of orders…this is called

noise

In future, check …

That the metric is as free of noise as possible

That there is not a less noisy measure - such as % of orders delivered within 8 weeks, or RTY through a bottleneck (such as test)Slide13

Linearity

A measurement is linear if there is a straight line relationship between the observed or measured value and the actual valueSlide14

Impact of Linearity

Is 95% on time delivery only 5% better than 90%?If lead time is 50% do sales go up by 50%

Is it necessary to train 100% of employees or just 50%

Do all the engineers need a computer?

In each case we will be more in control if we fully understand the relationship between

Y and X

and how the magnitude of X or Y effects our decisionsSlide15

Repeatability and Reliability

T

o determine the accuracy of our measurement system and the limits on the usefulness of the measurement deviceSlide16

The necessity of training farmhands for first-class farms in the fatherly handling of farm livestock is foremost in the eyes of farm owners. Since the forefathers of the farm owners trained the farmhands for first-class farms in the fatherly handling of farm livestock, the farm owners feel they should carry on with the family tradition of training farmhands of first class farmers in the fatherly handling of farm livestock because they believe it is the basis of good fundamental farm management.

Task: You have 60 seconds to document the number of times the 6th letter of the alphabet appears in the following text.

Repeatability Exercise

Number:

____Slide17

You receive a complaint from a salesman that the on time delivery of your plant is low. The last 20 units shipped to a customer were late.

The plant quotes 100% on time. Every departmental manager is 100% on time according to their schedule

How can this be?

Repeatability - DiscussionSlide18

R&R - Why do we need it

To identify how much the chosen measuring system limits our ability to improve

Because measurement systems are often significantly flawed

To guarantee the truth of improvements madeSlide19

How to do R&R

Select a minimum of 30 parts/documents from the process and at least 2 operators

Half should have defects some of which are marginally defective, half defect free

Each operator examines each piece at least twice in a random order (ensure understanding of type of data being collected - Variable or Attribute)

Plot measurement against operator, run, part and standard

If R&R are not acceptable adjust process and repeatSlide20

Attribute ExampleSlide21

Attribute Analysis

Agrees with himself 14/14, 11/14, 14/14

Agrees with standard 26/28, 21/28, 22/28

Overall agree with standard = 26+21+22/(3*28)Slide22

Presenting Results

Operator 2 was inconsistent

No operator was perfectSlide23

Presenting Results

Overall accuracy of measurement 82%What is it about some parts that we can not measure them correctly?Slide24

Using computer software

Some of the initial conclusions that you can make are limited

If you want more precise information the team should seek advice from a specialistSlide25

Attribute R&R - Graphical outputSlide26

3

2

1

1

1

1

0

0

9

0

8

0

7

0

6

0

5

0

4

Oper

ID

By Operator

B

u

f

a

l

o

,

N

Y

P

l

a

n

t

1

5

m

m

S

x

S

g

m

a

B

B

0

1

0

1

/

1

9

9

8

G

a

g

e

#

0

2

0

3

7

1

M

s

c

:

T

o

l

e

a

n

c

e

:

R

e

p

o

r

t

e

d

b

y

:

D

a

e

o

f

u

d

y

:

G

a

g

e

n

a

m

e

:

Gage R & R (ANOVA) for Measure

1

0

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

1

1

1

0

0

9

0

8

0

7

0

6

0

5

0

4

Part ID

By Part

B

u

f

f

a

l

o

,

N

Y

P

l

a

n

t

1

5

m

m

S

i

x

S

i

g

m

a

B

B

0

1

/

0

1

/

1

9

9

8

G

a

g

e

#

0

2

0

3

7

1

M

i

s

c

:

T

o

l

e

r

a

n

c

e

:

R

e

p

o

r

t

e

d

b

y

:

D

a

t

e

o

f

s

t

u

d

y

:

G

a

g

e

n

a

m

e

:

Gage R & R (ANOVA) for Measure

Variable R&R - Graphical Analysis

In this example 3 operators measured twice the diameter of 10 turned components. What would the ideal graph look like for each? Slide27

R&R Class Exercise

Now its your turn

Grab a bag of

m&m’sSlide28

Measurement Systems Analysis

Six Sigma FoundationsContinuous Improvement Training