/
Teaching Diabetes Self-Management—in 4 Hours (or Less) Teaching Diabetes Self-Management—in 4 Hours (or Less)

Teaching Diabetes Self-Management—in 4 Hours (or Less) - PowerPoint Presentation

luanne-stotts
luanne-stotts . @luanne-stotts
Follow
401 views
Uploaded On 2016-07-02

Teaching Diabetes Self-Management—in 4 Hours (or Less) - PPT Presentation

Linda S Gottfredson PhD School of Education University of Delaware Kathy Stroh MS RD CDE Diabetes Prevention and Control Program Delaware Division of Public Health 1 CEHD Colloquium University of Delaware February 28 2013 ID: 387522

amp diabetes level learning diabetes amp learning level http health cognitive educators type 2007 www aade 2010 glucose instruction

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Teaching Diabetes Self-Management—in 4..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Teaching Diabetes Self-Management—in 4 Hours (or Less)

Linda S Gottfredson, PhDSchool of EducationUniversity of Delaware

Kathy Stroh, MS, RD, CDE

Diabetes Prevention and Control Program Delaware Division of Public Health

1

CEHD Colloquium, University of Delaware, February 28, 2013Slide2

Juvenile Diabetes Maturity-onset Diabetes

Insulin dependent Non-insulin dependent

Diabetes (IDD) Diabetes (NIDD) Type I Diabetes Type II DiabetesType 1 Diabetes Type 2 Diabetes

Types of Diabetes

2Slide3

Types of Diabetes (DM)

Type 1

-cell destruction;

autoimmune disease; complete lack of insulin 5-10% of total patientsType 2 -cell dysfunction and insulin resistanceGestational -cell dysfunction and insulin resistance during pregnancy 3Slide4

There is no such thing as Borderline Diabetes

or a “Touch of Diabetes.”

Pre-diabetes

is a diagnosis.4Slide5

There is no such thing as

Borderline

Diabetes or a “Touch of Diabetes.”

5Pre-diabetesSlide6

DM defects

6Slide7

Diabetes is a cardiovascular disease.

The Burden of Diabetes in Delaware, 2009. Diabetes Prevention and Control Program

People with diabetes are

twice as likely

to suffer a heart attack or stroke

compared to people without diabetes.

7Slide8

Natural

history of Type 2 diabetes

Adapted from International Diabetes Center (IDC), Minneapolis, Minnesota.

ObesityDiabetesUncontrolled Hyperglycemia

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

50

100

150

200

250

Glucose

(mg/dL)

Relative

Function (%)

-10

-5

0

diagnosis

5

10

15

20

25

30

Years of Diabetes

Post-meal Glucose

Fasting Glucose

Insulin Resistance

Insulin Level

-cell Failure

Insulin Resistance

Family

History

PrediabetesSlide9

Why teach self-management?Patients

must control their blood glucose (BG) levels to avoid complicationsControlling BG is a complex, 24/7, life-long taskRx’s change, increase; may not insure optimal BG controlChanges in dietary intake & physical activity necessaryAnd more…So much to learn and do (or stop doing)9Slide10

PWD’s* everyday reality

* “Diabetic” is not a noun10Slide11

11Slide12

12Slide13

13Slide14

As teacher educators,

how would you recommend teaching diabetes self-management?Here’s the challenge14Slide15

Private schools

0.4 mil teachers 5.4 mil pupils$673 billion15

Federal

State

District

Federal

State

District

Regulations

P

ublic schools

3 million

50 million

Diabetes education??Slide16

$673 billion

16

Federal

State

District

Federal

State

District

Regulations

P

ublic schools

3 million

50 million

Instruction

Learning tasks

Private schools

0.4 mil teachers

5.4 mil pupils

Diabetes education??Slide17

Context: Exploding numbers

12012 Condition of Education, Table A-3-1. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2012/2012045_5.pdf2 For 1970, All A

ges is interpolated from 1968 and 1973. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics/diabetes_slides.htm.

3For 1990 and 2010, All ages and 65+ derived from http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics/prev/national/tnumage.htm, and 18+ from http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics/prev/national/figadults.htm4 Boyle et al (2010), Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population. Population Health Metrics, 8(29).I averaged the results from their 4 models. Huang et al. (2009) estimated 34.2M for Type 2 alone: Using clinical information to project federal health care spending. Health Affairs, 28(5), w978-990. 5CDC’s Diabetes Data & Trends.

http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/DDT_STRS2/NationalDiabetesPrevalenceEstimates.aspx,

Just 5 years!

Public schools

Diabetes cases

Number needing instruction

Millions enrolled

1

Millions

diagnosed

with diabetes Type 1 or 2

(non-institutionalized civilians)

Fall of

Total

Elementary (

preK

-8)

HS (9-12)

1970

45.5

32.5

13.0

1990

41.2

29.9

11.3

2010

49.5

34.6

14.9

2020

52.7

37.3

15.4

All ages

Adults (18+)

Older (65+)

1970

2

3.6

1990

3

6.6

6.6

2.8

2010

3

20.9

20.7

7.8

2020

4

33.5

2004 % diagnosed adults

>

20 years 5 200917Slide18

Average $/person

2

4,3107,925

10,694 (2008)11,0936,7451,834466Context: Exploding costs12011 Digest of Education Statistics, Table 28, http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d11/tables/dt11_028.asp. Table reports costs in current dollars, so inflation calculator used to bring up to 2010 values.

22011 Digest of Education Statistics, Table 194

,

http

://

nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d11/tables/dt11_194.asp

3

Dall

et al.(2010). The economic burden of diabetes.

Health Affairs, 29

(2), exhibit 4. Used inflation calculator to translate dollars from 2007 to 2010.

http://

www.usinflationcalculator.com

4

Huang

et al. (2009) Using clinical information to project federal health care spending.

Health Affairs, 28

(5), w978-990. Includes Type 2

only.

Type 1 would be <5

% of cases but higher per capita cost. Inflation calculator used to change costs from 2007 to 2010 dollars.

5

No 2020-2030 projections available for school expenditures, so just repeated % GDP from the prior 2 decades. Used Huang et al.’s total diabetes medical costs for 2007, together with 2007 GDP, to calculate costs as % GDP in that year (1.1%). Then used their Exhibit 3 (projected real growth as multiple of GDP) to estimate % GDP in 2010, 2020, and 2030. No data prior to 2007, so just took line toward

asymtope

.

Students in public schools , K-12

Diabetes cases, diagnosed and undiagnosed

Total expenditures

(2010 dollars)

Medical costs only

(2010 dollars)

1970

1990

2010

2007

3

2020

4

Total $ (billions)

1

270

415

673

Type 1

11

Type 2

111

Undiag

12

Pre-

diab

27

Total

160

Type 2

237

Diabetes

Schools

18Slide19

Total

medical costs, by age & diabetes type, 2007$ (billions)25.3

105.7

11.0 10.5Dall et al.(2010). The economic burden of diabetes. Health Affairs, 29(2), exhibit 4. 2007 current dollars.19%(prevalence)Slide20

35,365

Average cost ($)

Average

medical costs per person by age & diabetes type, 2007Dall et al.(2010). The economic burden of diabetes. Health Affairs, 29(2), exhibit 4. 2007 current dollars.20Slide21

Context: Institutional resources

Public schoolsDiabetes self-management education

Dedicated spacePermanent buildingsVaries; hospitals, medical offices, community sites

Guaranteed funding100% tax-supported1 (local, state, federal)Varies by health plan; free community classes provided by DPH/DPCP. Mandatory attendance10-14 yearsNone, all voluntary. ~ 24% of Medicare patients attended DSMT class.Teaching force:Trained in content areaCertified to teach Classroom teachersAll (N=3.1 million) 199%1Many staff do DSME: medical (e.g., MD, RN, RD, NP, PA, RPh); non-medical (e.g., CHW, CHES, peer educators).

DSMP classes given by lay trainers.Trained in disease management: MD, RN, RPh, RD, NP, CDE.

Trained to educate: Only CDEs (N=8710), national credential; possible state licensure too.

Curriculum content

&

Teacher lesson plans

State national standards (CCSS

2

)

Always. Vary by teacher

common planning

Curriculum content:

ADA and AADE certify Recognized Programs. DSMP has evidence-based curriculum.

Lesson plans:

vary with ADA & AADE programs. Fidelity agreement for DSMP.

1

2012

Condition of Education

, Tables A-19-1 (2008-2009), A-17-1 & A-17-2 (2007-2008)

2

http://www.corestandards.org/

=

trend towards

21

M

ore variable for DSMESlide22

5 levels of diabetes educators*Level 1, non-healthcare professional,

Level 2, healthcare professional non-diabetes educator,Level 3, non-credentialed diabetes educator,Level 4, credentialed diabetes educator, andLevel 5, advanced level diabetes educator/clinical manager.*American Association of Diabetes Educators (AADE) (2011). Scope of Practice, Standards of Practice, and Standards of Professional Performance for Diabetes Educators, p. 4. http://www.diabeteseducator.org/export/sites/aade/_resources/pdf/research/ScopeStandards_Final2_1_11.pdf

22Slide23

Context: Instructional resources

op0Public schoolsDiabetes self-management education

Hours of instruction in content area

(average per year)State/district-mandated minimum hours:1G1-4: 418 read/write 194 math 292 scienceVaries greatly by health plan & site - Classes: 10-15 hrs - Individual DSME: variesInstructional strategiesSystematic use of pedagogical principlesFor individual patients: CDE’s assessment of patient’s needs.

For groups: scripts for some non-medical educators (e.g., DSMP)

Pace, sequencing, Bloom level not always considered.

Special needs students

Established protocols?

Yes, legal obligation (IDEA)

Currently, no

DSME materials or curricula specifically for elderly or persons with disabilities.

Age- and ability-differentiated instruction & materials

Age grouping, preK-12

Elem:

reading/math groups within or between

classrooms, all

with different lessons

HS:

Tracks

None.

Growing concern over low “health literacy” & age-related cognitive decline with PWDs, but

-Diabetes education materials vary widely; content, but not

complexity, matched to PWD’s learning needs.

- PWDs are given pre-determined meters and supplies,

regardless of their abilities.

1

Data

for 2003-2004. Source: “

Changes in Instructional Hours in Four Subjects by Public School Teachers of Grades 1 Through 4,“ May 2007, NCES report 2007-305

http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED497041.pdf

/

2

http

://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics/preventive/tNewDEduAgeTot.htmwww.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED497041.pdf

23

Little differentiation

Limited time

Materials too complexSlide24

Example of required task for all PWDs:

Glucose metersand lancet devicesDemonstration !! 24Slide25

Our efforts

Describe job of self-care from patient’s perspective. Collaboration with CDS: AUCD ConferenceAADE Conference: “Cognitive Demands of DSME”NACDD Teleconference: “Cognitive Demands of DSME”

AADE Conference 2013: “Psychometrics of DSME in the Elderly” Identify the job’s most critical tasksTrace (and limit) cognitive complexity of learning tasks

Differentiate instruction by ability (“literacy”) levelProvide scripts for providers that minimize complexityProvide patient handout that reinforces learning25Slide26

AADE’s description of DSM*Living well with diabetes requires active, diligent, effective self-management of the disease. It is a process that:

Requires making and acting on choices, on a regular and recurring basis, that affect one’s healthIncludeslearning the body of knowledge relevant to the disease state, defining personal goals, weighing the benefits and risks of various treatment options, making informed choices about treatment, developing skills (both physical and behavioral) to support those choices, evaluating the efficacy of the plan toward reaching self-defined goals. *American Association of Diabetes Educators (AADE) (2011). Scope of Practice, Standards of Practice, and Standards of Professional Performance for Diabetes

Educators, pp. 1-2. http://www.diabeteseducator.org/export/sites/aade/_resources/pdf/research/ScopeStandards_Final2_1_11.pdf26Slide27

AADE’s description of DSM*Living well with diabetes requires active, diligent, effective self-management of the disease. It is a process that:

Requires making and acting on choices, on a regular and recurring basis, that affect one’s healthIncludeslearning the body of knowledge relevant to the disease state, defining personal goals, weighing the benefits and risks of various treatment options, making informed choices about treatment, developing skills (both physical and behavioral) to support those choices, evaluating the efficacy of the plan toward reaching self-defined goals. *American Association of Diabetes Educators (AADE) (2011). Scope of Practice, Standards of Practice, and Standards of Professional Performance for Diabetes

Educators, pp. 1-2. http://www.diabeteseducator.org/export/sites/aade/_resources/pdf/research/ScopeStandards_Final2_1_11.pdfWhat Bloom level would you assign to each?

RememberUnderstandApplyAnalyzeEvaluateCreate27

AADE7TM

curriculum content

Healthy eating

Being active

Monitoring

Taking medication

Problem solving

Reducing risks

Healthy copingSlide28

Objective: Maintain blood glucose within healthy limits to avoid complications

Learn about diabetes in general (At “entry’)Physiological processInterdependence of diet, exercise, medsSymptoms & corrective actionConsequences of poor control

Apply knowledge to own case (Daily, Hourly)Implement appropriate regimen Continuously

monitor physical signs Diagnose problems in timely mannerAdjust food, exercise, meds in timely and appropriate manner Coordinate with relevant parties (Frequently)Negotiate changes in activities with family, friends, job Enlist/capitalize on social supportCommunicate status and needs to practitionersUpdate knowledge & adjust regimen (Occasionally)When other chronic conditions or disabilities developWhen new treatments are orderedWhen life circumstances changeConditions of work—24/7, no days off, no retirement

Our more patient-centered job description

Self-

management

Training

28Slide29

Objective: Maintain blood glucose within healthy limits to avoid complications

Learn about diabetes in general (At “entry’)Physiological processInterdependence of diet, exercise, medsSymptoms & corrective actionConsequences of poor control

Apply knowledge to own case (Daily, Hourly)Implement appropriate regimen Continuously

monitor physical signs Diagnose problems in timely mannerAdjust food, exercise, meds in timely and appropriate manner Coordinate with relevant parties (Frequently)Negotiate changes in activities with family, friends, job Enlist/capitalize on social supportCommunicate status and needs to practitionersUpdate knowledge & adjust regimen (Occasionally)When other chronic conditions or disabilities developWhen new treatments are orderedWhen life circumstances changeConditions of work—24/7, no days off, no retirement

Our more patient-centered job description

Self-

management

Training

29

It is NOT just following a plan.

It is also thinking and acting to minimize problems. Slide30

Our efforts

Describe job of self-care from patients’ perspectiveIdentify the job’s most critical tasksTrace (and limit) cognitive complexity of learning tasksDifferentiate instruction by ability (“literacy”) levelProvide scripts for providers that minimize complexityProvide patient handout that reinforces learning

30Slide31

UD survey:

Criticality rankings

31Slide32

Our efforts

Describe job of self-care from patients’ perspectiveIdentify the job’s most critical tasksTrace (and limit) cognitive complexity of learning tasksDifferentiate instruction by ability (“literacy”) level Provide scripts for providers that minimize complexity

Provide patient handout that reinforces learning32Slide33

Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning Objectives

Latest (2001) revisionBloom levels = continuum of cognitive complexity

Not just readability!!

33Slide34

*

Revised 2001: Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. NY: Addison Wesley Longman.

To be or not to be,

that is the question.

To be or not to be,

that is the question.

To be or not to be,

that is the question.

To be or not to be,

that is the question.

To be or not to be,

that is the question.

To be or not to be,

that is the question.

“To be or not to be”

Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (cognitive domain)*

Simplest tasks

1.

Remember

recognize, recall,

Identify, retrieve

2. Understand

paraphrase, summarize, compare, predict, infer

3.

Apply

execute familiar task,, apply procedure to unfamiliar task

4.

Analyze

distinguish, focus, select, integrate, coordinate

5.

Evaluate

check, monitor, detect inconsistencies, judge effectiveness

6.

Create

hypothesize, plan, invent,

devise, design

Most complex tasks

34Slide35

*

Revised 2001: Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. NY: Addison Wesley Longman.

Anticipate effect of

exercise & foods

on blood glucose.

Coordinate meds, diet, and

exercise.

Manage sick days.

Determine when & why blood glucose is out of control

Monitor symptoms; assess whether action needed; evaluate effectiveness of actions

Create daily and contingency plans that control blood glucose

Recall effects of exercise on

glucose.

Remember to take

BGs & Rx.

Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (cognitive domain)*

Simplest tasks

1.

Remember

recognize, recall,

Identify, retrieve

2. Understand

paraphrase, summarize, compare, predict, infer

3.

Apply

execute familiar task,, apply procedure to unfamiliar task

4.

Analyze

distinguish, focus, select, integrate, coordinate

5.

Evaluate

check, monitor, detect inconsistencies, judge effectiveness

6.

Create

hypothesize, plan, invent,

devise, design

Most complex tasks

Remember to measure

foods, drinks & read labels.

35Slide36

What about reading nutrition labels?How important?

How complex?EssentialExtremely36Slide37

37Slide38

Information is better

because it’s inchart form

Amount per serving

But, it contains aconfusing technical symbol.Can you spot it?“Amount/serving”38Slide39

What’s the problem here?

39Slide40

And here?

Organic

Healthy

No sugar added40Slide41

Pros:

Fewer items

Single vertical list Major headings stand out

Cons: Lots of irrelevant infoSeemingly inconsistent info

Better, but…

41Slide42

Food Label revision…

counting carbohydrates

42Slide43

Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (cognitive domain)

Simplest tasks1. Rememberrecognize, recall,Identify, retrieve

Understand paraphrase, summarize, compare, predict, infer,3. Apply

execute familiar task,, apply procedure to unfamiliar task4. Analyze distinguish, focus, select, integrate, coordinate5. Evaluate check, monitor, detect inconsistencies, judge effectiveness6. Create hypothesize, plan, invent, devise, designMost complex tasks

Distractors:

CHOs

vs

Fiber

vs

Fat

Carb

vs

non-carb ??

Sequence of label

Total CHOs

important,

“Sugars”

not

Grams as volume

vs

wt

Part of meal

vs

snack OK?

CHOs in intended

serving?

CHOs

vs

Fat/

Chol

vs

Na

Location of relevant

CHO

(carb)

gms

How many CHO

gms

in

1 serving?

Subtract fiber

gms

from CHO

gms

Plan a meal or snack

43Slide44

Our efforts

Describe job of self-care from patients’ perspectiveIdentify the job’s most critical tasksTrace (and limit) cognitive complexity of learning tasksDifferentiate instruction by ability (“literacy”) levelProvide scripts for providers that minimize complexity

Provide patient handout that reinforces learningHow different

in ability can adults be?44Slide45

Typical literacy items, by difficulty levelNational Adult Literacy Survey (NALS), 1993

NALS difficulty level (& scores)

% US adults

(age 65+) peaking at this levelSimulated everyday tasks 5(375-500)

3%

~

0%

Use calculator to determine cost of carpet for a room

Use table of information to compare 2 credit cards

4

(325-375)

15%

4%

Use eligibility pamphlet to calculate SSI benefits

Explain difference between 2 types of employee benefits

3

(275-325)

31%

16%

Calculate miles per gallon from mileage record chart

Write brief letter explaining error on credit card bill

2

(225-275)

28%

33%

Determine difference in price between 2 show tickets

Locate intersection on street map

1

(0-225)

23%

47%

Total bank deposit entry

Locate expiration date on driver’s license

Daily self-maintenance in modern literate societies

45Slide46

NALS

difficulty level (& scores)

% US adults (age 65+)

peaking at this levelSimulated everyday tasksNational Adult Literacy Survey (NALS), 1993) 5(375-500)

3%

~

0%

Use calculator to determine cost of carpet for a room

Use table of information to compare 2 credit cards

4

(325-375)

15%

4%

Use eligibility pamphlet to calculate SSI benefits

Explain difference between 2 types of employee benefits

3

(275-325)

31%

16%

Calculate miles per gallon from mileage record chart

Write brief letter explaining error on credit card bill

2

(225-275)

28%

33%

Determine difference in price between 2 show tickets

Locate intersection on street map

1

(0-225)

23%

47%

Total bank deposit entry

Locate expiration date on driver’s license

level of inference (“connecting the dots”)

abstractness of info

distracting information

number of features to match

Not

reading per se, but “problem solving”

T

ypical literacy items, by difficulty level

National Adult Literacy Survey (NALS),

1993

46Slide47

Complexity & aging

47Slide48

g -

Basic

information processing(GF)Basiccultural Knowledge(GC)Age-related cognitive declineLearning & reasoning ability

Age 8

48

Age 80Slide49

Our efforts

Describe job of self-care from patients’ perspectiveIdentify the job’s most critical tasksTrace (and limit) cognitive complexity of learning tasksDifferentiate instruction by ability (“literacy”) levelProvide scripts for providers that minimize complexityProvide patient handout that reinforces learning

49Slide50

“Rx for Physical Activity”

for a Rural Community Health Center

Linda S.

Gottfredson, PhDSchool of EducationUniversity of DelawareKathy Stroh, MS, RD, CDEDiabetes Prevention & Control Program

Delaware Division of Public Health

Presented at the 2009 Diabetes Translation

Conference of the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC).

Long Beach, CA, April 24, 2009

50Slide51

51Slide52

52Slide53

Basic pedometer—just counts steps53Slide54

Graduated Rx

Basic

Rxincreases

speedhttp://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/Rx

54Slide55

55Slide56

Teaching the teacher: Script for CDE when prescribing “Rx for Walking”

Provides the CDE with:

Educationally sound teaching strategyKey ideas Content, sequence, and pace of instruction, etc.Implicit training Be concrete, personalize, use meaningful metaphors, etc.

56Slide57

57Slide58

58Slide59

59Slide60

Lesson plan: Don’t assume they know what’s obvious to you

Can’t assume:

That patient will know:

What a pedometer is How to wear it The exact regimen of the Rx i.e., extra stepsThat the educator will know specific learning steps for: Aim of script (e.g., extra steps) How to adjust regimen60Slide61

Our efforts

Describe job of self-care from patients’ perspectiveIdentify the job’s most critical tasksTrace (and limit) cognitive complexity of learning tasks Differentiate instruction by ability (“literacy”) levelProvide scripts for providers that minimize complexity

Provide patient handout that reinforces learning61Slide62

62Slide63

Thank you.

Questions?Advice?63Slide64

64Slide65

5 levels of diabetes educators*Level 1, non-healthcare professional,

Level 2, healthcare professional non-diabetes educator,Level 3, non-credentialed diabetes educator,Level 4, credentialed diabetes educator, andLevel 5, advanced level diabetes educator/clinical manager.*American Association of Diabetes Educators (AADE) (2011). Scope of Practice, Standards of Practice, and Standards of Professional Performance for Diabetes Educators, p. 4. http://www.diabeteseducator.org/export/sites/aade/_resources/pdf/research/ScopeStandards_Final2_1_11.pdf

65