/
uV  Drinking Water Treatment uV  Drinking Water Treatment

uV Drinking Water Treatment - PowerPoint Presentation

luanne-stotts
luanne-stotts . @luanne-stotts
Follow
402 views
Uploaded On 2016-04-26

uV Drinking Water Treatment - PPT Presentation

Emerging Technologies NSFANSI Standard 55 Evaluation of Microbiological Reduction Performance Capability Low Pressure uV Lamps 254nm Wavelength Performance Equated to Delivered Dose Class ID: 294829

wavelength water sci technologies water wavelength technologies sci technol 254nm environ amp dose 254 ms2 research nsf linden class

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "uV Drinking Water Treatment" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

uV Drinking Water Treatment

Emerging TechnologiesSlide2

NSF/ANSI Standard 55Evaluation of Microbiological Reduction Performance Capability

Low Pressure

uV

Lamps

254nm

Wavelength

Performance Equated to Delivered Dose

Class

A 40

mJ

/cm

2

With Sensor Technology – Unknown Water Supply

Class B 16

mJ

/cm

2

Without Sensing Technology – Known Water Supply

Test Organisms

Bacteriophage

MS2 – Class A

S.

cerevisiae

/Bacteriophage

T1

– Class BSlide3

How does UV inactivate micro-organisms?

Well Accepted Mechanism of UV Inactivation

At a wavelength of 254nm, UV will break the molecular bonds within micro-organismal DNA, producing thymine dimers and thereby destroying them or prohibiting growth and reproduction

253.7nm

UVC Absorbance of DNASlide4

Emerging TechnologiesAlternate uV

Technologies Are Under Active Development

LED

DBD

Excimer

MP CFL

HalogenuV Emissions May Be Monochromatic or Polychromatic at Wavelengths Other Than 254 nmSlide5

Market TrendsSlide6

The Issue (Opportunity)Standard 55 Performance Based Upon Dose…..Dose Equated to Anticipated Log Reduction at 254 nm Wavelength

Relationship of Dose to Log Reduction Based Upon Established Research and Scientific Findings

The Question (s)

Does the Dose/Log Reduction Relationship Hold For Alternate Technologies Emitting as Wavelength (s) Other than 254 nm?

Is There a Need for the Development of Alternative Measuring Tools?

Can These Alternate Technologies Be Built Into Standard 55?Slide7

Wavelength

(nm)

Polychromatic

Monochromatic

Organisms

Main

Findings

Ref210, 220, 230, 240, 260, 270, 280, 290

Adenovirus

More DNA damage was observed at >260nm

Loss of viral infectivity was due to the UV damage to a viral component at <240nm

S.

Beck

et al

.,

Environ.

Sci. & Technol.

,

2014

214, 230, 240, 254, 265, 280, 293Bacillus / sporesMS2 coliphageMS2 was 3 times more sensitive to near 214nm compared to the 254 nm B. subtilis spores were most sensitive to 265nmH. Mamane-Gravetz et al., Environ. Sci. & Technol., 2005216, 230, 242, 255, 263, 271, 281, 290Cryptosporidium parvum oocystsC. Parvum oocyst was most sensitive to 271nmOocyst can be appreciably inactivated at low UV dose K. Linden et al., Water Sci. & Technol., 2001222, 228, 239, 260, 280, 289AdenovirusOther wavelength emitted by the polychromatic UV lamps are more effective than the 254nm emitted by LP UV. K. Linden et al., Appl. Environ. Microbio., 2007

Summary of Previous Wavelength WorksSlide8

MotionThe motion is that the uV

Task Group be requested to evaluate the available research associated with alternate

uV

technologies related to the germicidal treatment of water and report back to the Joint Committee their findings and recommendations for accommodating these technologies within the NSF/ANSI standards framework.Slide9
Slide10
Slide11
Slide12

How Emerging Technologies InactivateHow UV inactivates254nm comparison to other wavelengths

MS2 Surrogate potential

E

Coli

S

Typhimurium LT2Bacillus Subtilis

SporesSlide13

How does 253.7nm compare to other wavelength?

Mamane-Gravetz

et al.

,

Environ. Sci. & Technol.

,

2005

Linden

et al.

,

Water Sci. & Technol.

, 2001

Beck

et al.

,

Environ. Sci. & Technol.

, 2014

Linden

et al.

, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2007 Slide14

How does MS2/254nm Inactivation compare to bacteria / waterborne pathogens?

Bowker

et al.

,

Water Research.

, 2011

Ren

Zhuo

Chen

et al.

,

Water Research.

, 2009Slide15

How does MS2/254nm Inactivation compare to bacteria / waterborne pathogens?

Mamane-Gravetz

et al.

,

Envirron

. Sci. Technology.

, 2005

Ren

Zhuo

Chen

et al.

,

Water Research.

, 2009Slide16

Testing Protocol OpportunitiesRevision to NSF/ANSI Standard 55

MS2 as surrogate

Development of new NSF Certification

Alternative Surrogate