/
Extended Evolution: Regulatory Networks and Niche Construction Extended Evolution: Regulatory Networks and Niche Construction

Extended Evolution: Regulatory Networks and Niche Construction - PowerPoint Presentation

margaret
margaret . @margaret
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2022-06-28

Extended Evolution: Regulatory Networks and Niche Construction - PPT Presentation

in Development Evolution and History Manfred D Laubichler Arizona State University Santa Fe Institute Marine Biological Laboratory Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Johns Challenge for Future Work ID: 926626

regulatory evolution developmental evolutionary evolution regulatory evolutionary developmental phenotypic development networks genome experimental dynamics framework amp computational gene heredity

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Extended Evolution: Regulatory Networks ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Extended Evolution:Regulatory Networks and Niche Construction in Development, Evolution and History

Manfred D. LaubichlerArizona State UniversitySanta Fe InstituteMarine Biological LaboratoryMax Planck Institute for the History of Science

Slide2

John’s Challenge for Future Work:— How to fill in remaining conceptual gaps between autocatalysis and multiple networks?Or to quote Jorge Wagensberg:— Between an amoeba and man, something must have happened!!!

Slide3

Reflections on “The Emergence of Organizations and Markets” from the Perspective of Evolutionary Theory1. A productive case of transdisciplinary exchange2. Needs to based on current (and future) evolutionary theory, not an outdated version

Main Challenges1. For Evolutionary Theory: — Integrating regulatory network and niche construction perspectives; — Integrating mechanisms related to the origin of variation (novelty) with evolutionary dynamics; — developing an adequate conception of history; — developing a unified conception for molecular to cultural and knowledge evolution

2. For P&P:

Incorporating developmental and evolutionary conceptions;

G

aining a better understanding of the relationships and dynamics between networks and contexts

Slide4

The standard historical narrative of Evolutionary BiologyDarwin

Mendel/Morgan &Population GeneticsModern SynthesisEvo

Devo

Common Descent, Natural Selection, Gradualism,

Open Question of Inheritance

Rules of transmission genetics, Physical Basis of Heredity,

Genes as abstractions (factors), statistical approaches,

Open

Questions related to effects of genes (other than statistical)

Common explanatory framework:

(adaptive) dynamics of populations are the primary

explanation for phenotypic evolution

, developmental mechanisms are

secondary (complexity of the genotype-phenotype map)

Dynamics of Alleles connected to

Adaptation and Speciation;

Simple Genotype-Phenotype Map

Gradualism

Complex GT—PT Map, constraints, conservation, comparison

“to complete the Modern Synthesis”

Slide5

An alternative history of Developmental EvolutionDarwin

Boveri, Cell Biology &EntwicklungsmechanikKühn, Goldschmidt &Developmental PhysiologicalGenetics

Regulatory Evolution,

GRNs

& Synthetic

Experimental Evolution

Common Descent, Natural Selection, Gradualism, Open Question of Inheritance,

Developmental Considerations about the Origin of Variation

Role of the Nucleus in Development and Heredity, Experimental Approaches, Speculative Ideas about the

Hereditary Material as a Structured System governing Development

Common explanatory framework:

Mechanistic Explanation of Development and Evolution as primary;

Development as the Origin of Phenotypic Variation, Adaptive Dynamics as

secondary

Physiological Gene Action,

Macroevolution, Gene

Pathways

Slide6

The Britten-Davidson Model (1969

)— A conceptual/logical Framework for Developmental Evolution• Logical structure of “regulation of gene activity”• Based on

a hierarchical and functional structure

of the

genome

• Explicit recognition as a

mechanism of phenotypic evolution

• Offered a constructive-mechanistic alternative theory of phenotypic evolution

Open Question:

Specific Structure of the Network

(->experimental challenge)

Slide7

Underlying Assumptions in Evolutionary Theory about Phenotypic Evolution: => “Mutations will get you there” => Problem: What is the Effect of a Mutation => Problem: What is the Structure of the Genotype- Phenotype Map

Part of the long quest to understand the origins of variation and the patterns of phenotypic diversity (think body plans)

Slide8

ProblemBoth sides in the current debate between the primacy of regulatory or standard adaptive evolution have ample empirical evidence=> This is a debate about epistemology, not data (but data help)

Slide9

Measuring Pleiotropy: Mouse Skeletal Characters

Slide10

Measuring Pleiotropy: Stickleback Skeletal Characters

Slide11

The data on genetic pleiotropysuggest

which, together with over three decades of molecular developmental biology, lead to =>

Slide12

Eric Davidson’s Concept of Gene Regulatory Networks

Slide13

Gene Regulatory Networks as the Foundation for Developmental Evolution

Process Diagram (from Peter and Davidson 2009)

Slide14

The dynamic n-dimensional regulatory genome

Traditional definition: => Genome is often equated with the complete DNA sequenceHowever, => Genome is the entirety of the hereditary information of an organism => heredity involves a whole range of complex regulatory processes and mechanisms (development) => heredity therefore implies the unfolding of the genetic information in space and time during development and evolution (1) the regulatory genome is thus a spatial-temporal sequence of regulatory states

(2) the regulatory genome anchors all other regulatory processes that affect development, heredity and therefore evolution

Slide15

Analyzing and Expanding Gene Regulatory Networks

Slide16

Sub-circuit Repertoire of Developmental GRNs

Slide17

Logic Reconstruction of a Developmental GRN

Slide18

The

Developmental

Evolution of

the

S

uperorganism

Slide19

A Hierarchical Expansion of the GRN Framework

Developmental Evolution in Social Insects: Regulatory Networks from Genes to Societies

Slide20

More than a Century later — Boveri realized“to transform one organism in front or our eyes into another”

Synthetic Experimental Evolution“to mold arbitrary abnormalities intotrue experiments…”• Requires both detailed knowledge AND a clear theoretical framework of developmental evolution

Transforms research on phenotypic evolution

=> Comparative GRN research

=> emphasis on the mechanisms of (genomic) regulatory control

=> Experimental intervention (re-constructing

GRNs

)

Erwin and Davidson, 2009

Slide21

Novel Computational Possibilities

Slide22

Peter et al., 2012

Slide23

Peter et al., 2012

Slide24

Further development of computational GRN models for multiple systems to: 1. Explore the future evolutionary potential of a given genome based on the introduction of known gain of function elements 2. Reconstruct specific evolutionary trajectories

(=> comparative analysis of GRNs based on phylogenetic hypotheses) 3. Develop predictions of evolutionary transitions (for experimental verification) 4. Further refine the hierarchical expansion of the GRN perspective to include the effects of post-transcriptional and environmental/epigenetic regulatory systems

Future Directions

Synthetic

in

silico

experimental evolution

Slide25

Co-evolutionary Dynamics of Biology, Material Culture and Knowledge:

The Neolithic Revolution

Slide26

Jared Diamond, et al. Science 300, 597 (2003)Spread of the neolithic

revolution

Slide27

Computational History of Science uses a variety of computational tools and techniques to aid historical and philosophical study of the life sciences. The rapidly declining cost of computing power and the increasing availability of both primary and secondary materials in digital formats makes it possible to translate historical and philosophical questions into computationally tractable ones. Computational approaches can range from simple term-frequency analysis of large scientific corpora, to complex reconstructions of the social, material, and conceptual fabrics of scientific fields using both automated and supervised procedures.

Slide28

1.

2.

3.

Historical settings & relationships

Topology of research literature

Conceptual relationships

Change Over Time

1950

1940

1930

1920

1960

1970

1980

Slide29

Computational Analysis of Eric Davidson’s Investigative Pathway

Slide30

Cytoscape

616 unique nodes.

1591 edges.

~30% of stage 1 dataset

https://www.youtube.com/embed/Zab15Jga8ro

Text

Slide31

Genecology Project

Collaborations among ecological geneticists and evolutionary ecologists surrounding key participants in a controversy over methods for modeling adaptive phenotypic plasticity during the early 1990s. Generated using the Vogon text-annotation and network-building tool. Each relationship is rooted in a precise location in a text stored in the Digital HPS Community Repository. Part of the doctoral dissertation research project, "Ecology, Evolution, and Development: The Conceptual Foundations of Adaptive Phenotypic Plasticity in Evolutionary Ecology." (

http://devo-evo.lab.asu.edu/phenotypic-plasticity

)

Slide32

Question: How can we asses the influence of a Research Program?

Slide33

Slide34

Slide35

Closeness Centrality

Slide36

Slide37

Conclusions1. Innovation/Inventions in CAS are the product of a complex interplay between internal and external conditions (regulatory networks and niche construction)2. The origin of variation (phenotypic of scientific) is a consequence of changes to the (extended) complex regulatory networks that govern CAS

3. These isomorphic properties enable a transfer of both concepts and methods between different fields concerned with innovation4. Extended Evolution is a more adequate mechanistic framework for understanding innovation/invention than simple population dynamics

Slide38

AcknowledgmentsFor intellectual discussions/collaborations:Eric DavidsonGünter WagnerJane

MaienscheinRobert PageBert HölldoblerJürgen RennDoug ErwinColin AllenHans-Jörg Rheinberger

Horst

Bredekamp

Olof

Leimar

Sander van

der

Leeuw

Graduate Students:Erick PeirsonKate MacCordGuido

CanigliaYawen Zhou

Lijing JiangNah ZhangSteve ElliottJulia DamerowMark Ulett

For Financial Support:

National Science FoundationStiftung Mercator

Smart Family FoundationMax Planck SocietyWissenschaftskolleg

zu BerlinArizona State University