/
CURRENCY WARS: YESTERDAY, TODAY – AND TOMORROW? CURRENCY WARS: YESTERDAY, TODAY – AND TOMORROW?

CURRENCY WARS: YESTERDAY, TODAY – AND TOMORROW? - PowerPoint Presentation

marina-yarberry
marina-yarberry . @marina-yarberry
Follow
352 views
Uploaded On 2018-12-18

CURRENCY WARS: YESTERDAY, TODAY – AND TOMORROW? - PPT Presentation

Benjamin J Cohen University of California Santa Barbara Remarks prepared for the Conference on The Political Economy of International Money Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas 4 April 2014 ID: 742999

exchange currency wars rules currency exchange rules wars lesson today answer proved wisdom conventional rates issue implemented successfully subject competitive managed 1944

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "CURRENCY WARS: YESTERDAY, TODAY – AND ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

CURRENCY WARS: YESTERDAY, TODAY – AND TOMORROW?

Benjamin J. Cohen

University of California, Santa Barbara

Remarks prepared for the Conference on “

The Political

Economy of International Money”

Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, 4 April 2014Slide2

THE POLITICS OF EXCHANGE RATES

What are the lessons from the Great Depression about the management of currency values?

Conventional wisdom at the time: “the proved disadvantages of freely fluctuating exchanges” (

International Currency Experience

, 1944). Exchange rates would have to be managed, subject to rulesSlide3

TWO QUESTIONS

1. Was the conventional wisdom right? (That is, was the correct lesson drawn?)

Answer: a qualified Yes

2. Has successfully has the lesson been implemented? (That is have exchange rates been managed well?)

Answer: not very well, in part because another important lesson was forgotten Slide4

1. WAS THE CONVENTIONAL WISDOM RIGHT?

There is no doubt that “freely fluctuating exchanges” invited competitive depreciations – in effect, currency war

From 1930 to 1938, 20 countries devalued by more than 10 %, some several times

Some evidence that depreciations may have been to some extent beneficial, by allowing less restrictive monetary policy (

Eichengreen

and Sachs, 1985)

But also no doubt that they were disorderly and disruptive

Legitimate conclusion: need some kind of rules to prevent currency warsSlide5

2. HOW SUCCESSFULLY HAS THE LESSON BEEM IMPLEMENTED?

Short answer: not very well. Hence much talk of currency wars today

Longer answer: a series of attempts to implement effective rules, but with little success. Most notable:

Bretton Woods (1944)

Committee of Twenty (1972-74)

Second Amendment (1976)Slide6

BRETTON WOODS

Floating was to be discouraged; but there was also a fear of too much rigidity

Hence a compromise: the par value system, meant to provide stability but also allow for adjustments in specific circumstances (“fundamental disequilibrium”)

Ultimately proved unworkable (What is a “fundamental disequilibrium?”)Slide7

COMMITTEE OF TWENTY

Called for a new “exchange rate regime based on stable but adjustable par values”

Proved unacceptable – overtaken by eventsSlide8

SECOND AMENDMENT

New Article IV

Free choice of exchange rate policies, subject only to:

a

dmonition to “avoid manipulating exchange rates… to gain an unfair competitive advantage”

“firm surveillance” by the IMF

These are the prevailing rules todaySlide9

HOW WELL HAVE THE RULES WORKED?

The IMF has tried hard

As early as 1977, the Fund specified principles for the exercise of surveillance

Article IV consultations were instituted

Principles for surveillance were updated in 2007

But governments have resisted oversight; dirty floats have become increasingly prevalent; talk of currency wars is not exaggeratedSlide10

WHY HAVE THE RULES NOT WORKED?

General issue: state sovereignty (resistance to supranational authority)

More specific issue: Geopolitics

A forgotten lesson of the Great Depression: the Tripartite Agreement of 1936 highlighted the importance of consensus among the major powers of the day; acknowledgement of mutual responsibility for systemic management.

Is a modern version of the Tripartite Agreement possible today?

UnlikelySlide11

CONCLUSION

Lessons have been learned, but selectively and imperfectly

.

George Santayana said: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

Are we condemned to repeat the currency wars of the 1930s?

Not impossible…