PPT-Grading and Reporting Student Learning

Author : marina-yarberry | Published Date : 2015-11-19

Credit to Thomas R Guskey Systemic Change Change is a highly complex process Professional development is essential Change is a prerequisite for Improvement Guiding

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Grading and Reporting Student Learning" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Grading and Reporting Student Learning: Transcript


Credit to Thomas R Guskey Systemic Change Change is a highly complex process Professional development is essential Change is a prerequisite for Improvement Guiding Questions What are the major reasons we use report cards and assign grades to students work. Grading Application Client call and sending required information visit Preparation of base note. Visit is conducted by analyst and domain expert. Draft Confirmation report is mailed to the c Types of grading framework. Defining grade boundaries. Guideline for effective & fair grading. GRADING. A grade represents the extent to which the intended learning outcomes have been achieved. Grading and scoring are not the same. Raymore-Peculiar School District. Fall 2014. What is Standards-Referenced grading and reporting?. Definition. Feedback. SRR is made up of marks on a scale from 1 to 4. Marks are not a comparison of one student to another, but rather a way to measure how well a student is understanding a Learning Target or Power Standard. This feedback reports student learning more accurately and to the degree to which students have attained mastery. . Fred Heid, Superintendent. May 20, 2015. Proposed D300 Middle School Assessment Enhancement Plan. Major Plan Components:. I. District Wide Middle School Grading Policy. Target Effective Date: 15-16 School Year. Is it Time for a Modification to Auburn’s Grading System?. Report to University Senate by Academic Standards Committee. , November 15, 2016. Charge to Academic Standards Committee. At the meeting of the Steering Committee on August 4, 2016, the Academic Standards Committee was charged to study whether Auburn should adopt a grading system that includes plus and minus grades.. Finding the Time to Grade Fairly. Killian Quigley. John Martin. Vanderbilt Center for Teaching . GradSTEP. January 26, 2013. Challenges. The “What” and “Why” of Grading. Time Management. Rubrics. YSMU, Yerevan, October 27-29, 2015. Grading based on student centered and transparent assessment of learning outcomes. (tommi.haapaniemi@uef.fi). presented by . Rubina. . Gasparian. . e. mail: rgaspari@aua.am. at the . 22nd District Agricultural Association’s Fairgrounds property, Del Mar, San Diego County. October . 5, 2011. Coastal Commission Meeting. Evidence of Wetlands. 11/29/2007. 12/22/2010. 12/27/2010. Scoring and Grading. To begin the grading and scoring process you must be sure you are in . Edit Mode . within the survey. c. ontent section.. Change the . Display . by clicking on the drop-down menu,. Report to University Senate by Academic Standards Committee. , November 15, 2016. Charge to Academic Standards Committee. At the meeting of the Steering Committee on August 4, 2016, the Academic Standards Committee was charged to study whether Auburn should adopt a grading system that includes plus and minus grades.. Severe Weather. Designated. Room H. Bathrooms. South Work Room. Adequate. Dahl/Flenthrope office. Storage Closet in Atrium Hallway (custodian closet). Basement stairway avoiding the top and bottom steps. Guideline Criterion Referenced Grading GRADEPOINTS very little about what Sources / Articles OConnor K 2002 How to Grade for Learning Glenview IL Pearson Education Approved by the Chancellors Office October 1977 244 PUBLISH DATE: DECEMBER 2004 Addendum 1 Female Genital Grading Table for Use in Microbicide Studies INDIVIDUAL SIGNS/SYMPTOMS PARAMETER GRADE 0 NORMAL GRADE 1 MILD GRADE 2 MODERATE GRADE 3

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Grading and Reporting Student Learning"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents