Immunity Passive immunity Active immunity Following clinical infection Following subclinical infection Following vaccination Following administration of Immunoglobulin or antiserum Transfer of maternal ID: 774980
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document " Immunity Specific defenses" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Immunity
Specific defensesImmunity
Passive immunity
Active immunity
Following clinical infection
Following subclinical infection
Following vaccination
Following administration ofImmunoglobulin or antiserum
Transfer of maternal Antibodies Through milk
Transfer of maternal Antibodies Through placenta
natural
acquired
Slide2Viral Vaccines
Slide3Immunizing agents
Immunizing agents
antisera
immunuglobulins
vaccines
Slide4Vaccination
Vaccination is a method of giving antigen to stimulate the immune response through active immunization.
A vaccine is an immuno-biological substance designed to produce specific protection against a given disease.
A vaccine is “antigenic” but not “pathogenic”.
Slide5Let’s go back in time to seehow this strategy works
The time: 500 B.C.
The place: Greece
Slide6Even 2,500 Years Ago, People Knew Immunity Worked.
Greek physicians noticed that people who survived smallpox never got it again.The insight: Becoming infected by certain diseases gives immunity.
Slide7Fast forward 2300 years
pathmicro.med.sc.edu/ppt-vir/vaccine.ppt
I had a brilliant idea
Slide8Vaccination
Charles Jenner 1796 : Cowpox/Swinepox 1800’s Compulsory childhood vaccination
Slide9Smallpox
1% v. 25% mortality
Life-long immunity UK: 1700’s China 1950 Pakistan/Afghanistan/ Ethiopia 1970
pathmicro.med.sc.edu/ppt-vir/vaccine.ppt
Slide10No animal reservoir Lifelong immunity Subclinical cases rare Infectivity does not precede overt symptoms One serotype
pathmicro.med.sc.edu/
ppt-vir/vaccine.ppt
Smallpox presented many advantages that made this possible
Slide11As a result, after a world-wide effortSmallpox was eliminated as a human disease in 1978
pathmicro.med.sc.edu/
ppt
-vir/
vaccine
.
ppt
Slide12Types of vaccines
Live vaccines
Attenuated live vaccines
Inactivated (killed vaccines)
Toxoids
Polysaccharide and polypeptide (cellular fraction) vaccines
Surface antigen (recombinant) vaccines.
Slide13Live vaccines
Live vaccines are made from live infectious agents without any amendment.
The only live vaccine is “Variola” small pox vaccine, made of live vaccinia cow-pox virus (not variola virus) which is not pathogenic but antigenic, giving cross immunity for variola.
Slide14Live attenuated (avirulent) vaccines
Virulent pathogenic organisms are treated to become attenuated and avirulent but antigenic. They have lost their capacity to induce full-blown disease but retain their immunogenicity.
Live attenuated vaccines should not be administered to persons with suppressed immune response due to:
Leukemia and lymphoma
Other malignancies
Receiving corticosteroids and anti-metabolic agents
Radiation
pregnancy
Slide15Live Attenuated Vaccineshave several advantages
Attenuated (weakened) form of the "wild" virus or bacteriumCan replicate themselves so the immune response is more similar to natural infectionUsually effective with one dose
Slide16Live Attenuated Vaccinesalso have several disadvantages
Severe reactions possible especially in immune compromised patientsWorry about recreating a wild-type pathogen that can cause diseaseFragile – must be stored carefully
MMWR, CDC
Slide17A number of the vaccines you received
were live Attenuated Vaccines
Viral measles, mumps, rubella, vaccinia, varicella/zoster, yellow fever, rotavirus, intranasal influenza, oral polioBacterial BCG (TB), oral typhoid
Slide18Inactivated (killed) vaccines
Organisms are killed or inactivated by heat or chemicals but remain antigenic.
They
are usually safe but less effective than live attenuated vaccines.
The
only absolute contraindication to their administration is a severe local or general reaction to a previous dose.
Slide19Inactivated Vaccines
Cannot replicate and thus generally not as effective as live vaccinesUsually require 3-5 dosesImmune response mostly antibody based
Minuses
Slide20Inactivated Vaccines
No chance of recreating live pathogenLess interference from circulating antibody than live vaccines
Pluses
Slide21Inactivated Vaccines are alsoa common approach today
Viral polio, hepatitis A, rabies, influenza*Bacterial pertussis*, typhoid* cholera*, plague*
Whole-cell vaccines
*not used in the United States
Slide22Other Inactivated Vaccinesnow contain purified proteinsrather than whole bacteria/viruses
Proteins hepatitis B, influenza, acellular pertussis, human papillomavirus, anthrax, LymeToxins diphtheria, tetanus
Slide23Sabin Polio Vaccine
Attenuated by passage in foreign host (monkey kidney cells)Selection to grow in new host makes virusless suited to original host
Slide24Sabin Polio Vaccine
Attenuated by
passage in foreign host
(monkey kidney cells)
Selection to grow in new host makes virus
less suited to original host
Grows in epithelial cells
Does not grow in nerves
No paralysis
Local gut immunity (IgA)
Slide25Salk Polio Vaccine
Formaldehyde-fixed No reversion
Slide26US: Sabin attenuated vaccine ~ 10 cases vaccine-associated polio per year =1 in 4,000,000 vaccine infections Scandinavia: Salk dead vaccine No gut immunity Cannot wipe out wt virus
Polio Vaccine illustrates the pluses and minuses of live vaccines
pathmicro.med.sc.edu/ppt-vir/vaccine.ppt
Slide27Reciprocal virus antibody titer
512
128
32
8
2
1
Serum
IgG
Serum
IgG
Serum
IgM
Serum
IgM
Nasal and duodenal
IgA
Nasal
IgA
Serum
IgA
Serum
IgA
Duodenal
IgA
Days
Vaccination
Vaccination
48
48
96
96
Killed (Salk) Vaccine
Live (Sabin) Vaccine
Live virus generates a more complete immune response
Slide28Modern molecular biologyhas offered new approaches to make vaccines
Clone gene from virus or bacteriaand express this protein antigenin yeast, bacteria or mammalian cells in culture
Slide29Modern molecular biologyhas offered new approaches to make vaccines
2. Clone gene from virus or bacteriaInto genome of another virus (adenovirus, canary pox, vaccinia)And use this live virus as vaccine
Slide30Cloned protein antigenshave pluses and minuses
Pluses
Easily manufactured and often relatively stable
Cannot “revert” to recreate pathogen
Minuses
Poorly immunogenic
Post-translational modifications
Poor CTL response
Slide31Viral vectors have pluses and minuses
Pluses
Infects human cells but some do not replicate
Better presentation of antigen
Generate T cell response
Minuses
Can cause bad reactions
Can be problems with pre-
exisiting
immunity to virus
Often can only accommodate one or two antigens
Slide32Toxoids
They are prepared by detoxifying the exotoxins of some bacteria rendering them antigenic but not pathogenic. Adjuvant (e.g. alum precipitation) is used to increase the potency of vaccine.
The antibodies produces in the body as a consequence of toxoid administration neutralize the toxic moiety produced during infection rather than act upon the organism itself. In general toxoids are highly efficacious and safe immunizing agents.
Slide33Polysaccharide and polypeptide (cellular fraction) vaccines
They are prepared from extracted cellular fractions e.g. meningococcal vaccine from the polysaccharide antigen of the cell wall, the pneumococcal vaccine from the polysaccharide contained in the capsule of the organism, and hepatitis B polypeptide vaccine.
Their efficacy and safety appear to be high.
Slide34Surface antigen (recombinant) vaccines.
It is prepared by cloning HBsAg gene in yeast cells where it is expressed. HBsAg produced is then used for vaccine preparations.
Their efficacy and safety also appear to be high.
Slide35Types of vaccines
Live
vaccines
Live
Attenuated vaccines
Killed
Inactivated vaccines
Toxoids
Cellular fraction vaccines
Recombinant vaccines
Small pox variola vaccine
BCG
Typhoid oral
Plague
Oral polio
Yellow fever
Measles
Mumps
Rubella
Intranasal
Influenza
Typhus
Typhoid
Cholera
Pertussis
Plague
Rabies
Salk polio
Intra-muscular influenza
Japanise encephalitis
Diphtheria
Tetanus
Meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine
Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine
Hepatitis B polypeptide vaccine
Hepatitis B vaccine
Slide36Routes of administration
Deep subcutaneous or intramuscular route (most vaccines)
Oral route (sabine vaccine, oral BCG vaccine)
Intradermal route (BCG vaccine)
Scarification (small pox vaccine)
Intranasal route (live attenuated influenza vaccine)
Slide37Scheme of immunization
Primary vaccination
One dose vaccines (BCG, variola, measles, mumps, rubella, yellow fever)
Multiple dose vaccines (polio, DPT, hepatitis B)
Booster vaccination
To maintain immunity level after it declines after some time has elapsed (DT, MMR).
Slide38Periods of maintained immunity due to vaccines
Short period (months): cholera vaccine
Two years: TAB vaccine
Three to five years: DPT vaccine
Five or more years: BCG vaccine
Ten years: yellow fever vaccine
Solid immunity: measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines.
Slide39Levels of effectiveness
Absolutely protective(100%): yellow fever vaccine
Almost absolutely protective (99%): Variola, measles, mumps, rubella vaccines, and diphtheria and tetanus toxoids.
Highly protective (80-95%): polio, BCG, Hepatitis B, and pertussis vaccines.
Moderately protective (40-60%) TAB, cholera vaccine, and influenza killed vaccine.
Slide40HIV Vaccine
Slide41Given that introduction, should we search for a vaccine against HIV and how would we do so?
Slide42This formidable array of defense mechanismsAllows HIV to avoid being suppressed by our immune system
Antigenic escape
Inaccessible epitopes
Downregulating MHC
Destruction of CD4+ T cells
Integration and latency
Slide43An effective vaccine could have a MAJOR
Impact on the future prognosis
iavi.org
Slide44An effective vaccine must get around
the strategies HIV uses to evade the immune system
Slide45The vaccine must be able to target conservedand essential parts of the viruses machinery
Antigenic escape
Inaccessible epitopes
+ existence of many viral strains
Slide46Molecular Biology of the Cell Alberts et al
The vaccine must act early in the processBefore the virus becomes firmly establishedAnd destroys the immune system
Destruction of CD4+ T cells
Integration and latency
Slide47There are many possible HIV Vaccine Approaches
Protein subunit
Synthetic peptide
Naked DNA
Inactivated Virus
Live-attenuated
Virus
Live-vectored Vaccine
Ramil
Sapinoro
, University of Rochester Medical Center
Slide48To begin we need to ask some key questions
What should vaccine elicit?
Slide49To begin we need to ask some key questions
What should vaccine elicit?
Neutralizing antibodiesto kill free virus
Slide50To begin we need to ask some key questions
What should vaccine elicit?
Neutralizing antibodiesto kill free virus
T cell response tokill infected cells
OR
Slide51To begin we need to ask some key questions
What should vaccine elicit?
Neutralizing antibodiesto kill free virus
T cell response tokill infected cells
OR
OR BOTH?
Slide52The biology of HIV provides some clues
Slide53Long term progressorsInfected with a Nef mutant virus?
Slide54This would generate both an antibody and a T cell responseCould this be used to generate a vaccine?
Slide55This prompted an experimentthat demonstrated the feasibility of a vaccine
December 1992: Live attenuated SIV vaccine
Lacking the gene
Nef
protected all monkeys for 2 years against massive dose of virus
All controls died
cell mediated immunity was key
Slide56However, this approach is still viewed as too risky to try on human subjects
December 1992: Live attenuated SIV vaccine
Lacking the gene
Nef
protected all monkeys for 2 years against massive dose of virus
All controls died
cell mediated immunity was key
Slide57The next efforts attempted touse recombinant viral proteins as antigensin an effort to generate neutralizing antibodies
Slide58VaxGen made two different formsof gp120 from different HIV strainsand began human trials after chimp testing
Slide59Human vaccine trials are large and very expensive
Slide60The trial was a failure, with only minor effects seen that were viewed as statistically insignificant
NY Times
Slide61The next approach involved usingviral vectors to try to also boost the T cell response
Slide62Many different viral vectors are being investigated but this trial used the human cold virus called adenovirus
Slide63They actually used three adenoviruses carrying three different viral proteins
Gag
Pol
Nef
Slide64Early results suggested the immune system was being stimulated
Slide65The hotly awaited results were released at the 2007 AIDS Meeting
Slide66You be the judge—what happened?
Slide67Slide68This stunning failure led to a re-thinkingof the approach
Slide69The field has decided in part togo back to the basics: how does HIV workand how can we assess vaccine success?
Questions: For a vaccine what are the measures of protection? Can we overcome polymorphism? What are the key antigens? Attenuated or killed or neither? Is Mucosal immunity critical? Should it Prevent infection or prevent disease? What are the best Animal modelsHow does HIV kill cells anyway?
Slide70However trials continue, but with more focus on the details of how they affect immunity