/
Philipp Hauke Philipp Hauke

Philipp Hauke - PowerPoint Presentation

marina-yarberry
marina-yarberry . @marina-yarberry
Follow
531 views
Uploaded On 2016-04-03

Philipp Hauke - PPT Presentation

David Marcos Marcello Dalmonte Peter Zoller IQOQI Innsbruck Brighton 18122013 Phys Rev X 3 041018 2013 Experimental input Christian Roos Ben Lanyon Christian ID: 273229

quantum gauge 2013 theory gauge quantum theory 2013 interactions numerical law implementation ion classical noiseconclusions electrodynamicstrapped resultsprotection dimensional scheme outline proposed spin

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Philipp Hauke" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Philipp Hauke

, David Marcos,

Marcello Dalmonte, Peter Zoller (IQOQI, Innsbruck)

Brighton, 18.12.2013

Phys. Rev. X 3, 041018 (2013)

Experimental input:Christian Roos, Ben Lanyon, Christian Hempel, René Gerritsma, Rainer Blatt

with trapped ions

Quantum simulation

of a

1D

lattice

gauge

theory Slide2

Gauge theories describe fundamental aspects of Nature

QCD

Spin liquids

Kitaev’s

toric

code

i

s a gauge theorySlide3

Outline

One dimensional quantum electrodynamicsTrapped-ion implementation Proposed scheme

Numerical resultsProtection of quantum gauge theory by classical noiseConclusionsSlide4

Outline

One dimensional quantum electrodynamicsTrapped-ion implementation

Proposed scheme Numerical resultsProtection of quantum gauge theory by classical

noise

ConclusionsSlide5

Gauge theory

Physical states obey a local symmetry.E.g.: Gauss’ law

In quantum mechanics, the gauge field acquires its own dynamics. This symmetry couples kinetic terms to fieldSlide6

To make amenable to computation

gauge theory lattice gauge theory

Gauss’ law

K. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D

1974

Bermudez,

Schaetz

,

Porras

, 2011,2012

Shi,

Cirac

2012

static gauge fieldSlide7

To make it simpler, discretize also gauge field (quantum link model).

Kogut

1979,

Horn

1981,

Orland

,

Rohrlich

1990,

Chandrasekharand

,

Wiese

1997,

Recent

Review:

U.-J. Wiese 2013

4

2

S

1/2

3

2

D

5/2

|

>

|

>Slide8

For trapped-ion implementation:

transform to spins (Jordan-Wigner)

Dynamics

Gauss’ law

Spins can be represented by internal states.

4

2

S

1/2

3

2

D

5/2

|

>

|

>Slide9

Want to implement

Dynamics

Conservation law (Gauss’ law)Slide10

Interesting phenomena in 1D QED

Hebenstreit

et al., PRL 111, 201601 (2013)

time

distancestring breaking

Charge densitySlide11

q

q

q–

q

m/J→–∞

m/J→+∞

False-vacuum

decay

q

uark picture

spontaneously breaks

charge

and parity symmetrySlide12

Outline

One dimensional quantum electrodynamicsTrapped-ion implementation

Proposed scheme Numerical resultsProtection of quantum gauge theory by classical noise

ConclusionsSlide13

Outline

One dimensional quantum electrodynamicsTrapped-ion implementation Proposed scheme

Numerical resultsProtection of quantum gauge theory by classical noiseConclusionsSlide14

Want to implement

Dynamics

Conservation law (Gauss’ law)

Rotate

coordinate systemSlide15

gauge

violating

Energy penalty

protects Gauss

law

total Hilbert

space

gauge invariantSlide16

Energy penalty protects Gauss’ law

spin-spin

interactions

longitudinal fieldSlide17

Need spin-spin interactions with equal strength

between nearest- and next-nearest neighbors

Want

Know how to do

Various experiments

Schaetz

, Monroe, Bollinger,

Blatt, Schmidt-

Kaler

,

Wunderlich

Theory

Porras

and

Cirac

, 2004

Sørensen

and

Mølmer

, 1999

See also

Hayes et al., 2013

Korenblit

et al., 2012Slide18

A closer look at the internal level structure

Ω

σ

Ω

S

Δ

E

Zee,D

Δ

E

Zee,S

4

2

S

1/2

3

2

D

5/2

|

>

σ

|

>

σ

|

>

S

|

>

SSlide19

Need spin-spin interactions with equal strength

between nearest- and next-nearest neighbors

Want

Know how to do

Solution:

Use two different

qubits

to

reinforce NNN interactions

+ dipolar tailsSlide20

Interactions protect gauge invariance

.And allow to generate the dynamics!

2nd order

perturbation theory

gauge

violating

gauge invariantSlide21

Outline

One dimensional quantum electrodynamicsTrapped-ion implementation Proposed scheme

Numerical resultsProtection of quantum gauge theory by classical noiseConclusionsSlide22

Outline

One dimensional quantum electrodynamicsTrapped-ion implementation

Proposed scheme Numerical resultsProtection of quantum gauge theory by classical noiseConclusionsSlide23

q

q

q–

q

m/J→–∞

m/J→+∞

False vacuum decay

q

uark picture

spin picture

b

reaks charge and parity symmetrySlide24

A numerical test validates the microscopic equations

Perturbation

theory valid

Dipolar tails

negligible

P. Hauke, D. Marcos,

M.

Dalmonte

, P.

Zoller

PRX

(2013)

Correct phase

Gauge invarianceSlide25

Sweeps in O(1ms) reproduce the dynamics of the LGT

fidelity after

quenchSlide26

S

1

2

σ

1

σ

2

+

2

+

S

21

A simpler proof-of-principle experiment with four ions

Avoids the

n

eed for fast-decaying interactions

Enforcing of Gauss lawSlide27

S

1

2

σ

1

σ

2

+

2

+

1

/

2

S

21

A simpler proof-of-principle experiment with four ions

Avoids the

n

eed for fast-decaying interactions

Remember interactions

Use mode with amplitudesSlide28

A simpler proof-of-principle experiment with four ions

Avoids the

need for fast-decaying interactionsAnd does not suffer from dipolar errors

S

1

2

σ

1

σ

2

+

2

+

1

/

2

S

21

4

–2

0

2

4

m/J

4

–2

0

2

4

m/J

Compare scalable setupSlide29

Outline

One dimensional quantum electrodynamicsTrapped-ion implementation

Proposed scheme Numerical resultsProtection of quantum gauge theory by classical noiseConclusionsSlide30

Outline

One dimensional quantum electrodynamicsTrapped-ion implementation

Proposed scheme Numerical resultsProtection of quantum gauge theory by classical noise

ConclusionsSlide31

gauge

violating

Until now:

Energetic protection.

total Hilbert

space

gauge invariantSlide32

Until now:Energetic protection.

For more complicated models, may require complicated

and fine-tuned interactions If we could do this with single-particle terms, that would be much easier!

gauge # theory generators

U(1) 1U(2) 4…Slide33

Dissipative protection

white noise

→ Master equation

before

Stannigel

et al.

,

arXiv

:1308.0528 (2013)

s

ingle-particle terms !

Gauge-invariant states

are not disturbed

U(1) :Slide34

Analogy:

driven two-level system

+

dephasing noise

remains in ground state forever. Slide35

gauge

violating

gauge invariant

Problem: Cannot obtain dynamics

as second-order perturbation

In neutral atoms, we found

a way using intrinsic collisions.

Stannigel

et al.

,

arXiv

:1308.0528 (2013)Slide36

Conclusions

Proposal for a simple lattice gauge theory. Ingredients:Two different

qubits (matter and gauge fields)Two perpendicular interactions (one stronger than the other and fast decaying with distance)Single-particle terms

Numerics validate the microscopic Hamiltonian.StaticsDynamics

(adiabatic sweep requires reasonable times)A simpler proof-of-principle is possible with four ions.

|

>

|

>

|

>

|

>

S

21

Phys

. Rev. X 3, 041018 (2013

)

arXiv

:1308.0528 (2013

)Slide37

Outlook

Implementations with higher spins or several “flavors.”“Pure gauge” models in 2D.

Gauge invariance protected by the classical Zeno effect?arXiv:1308.0528

Optical lattices

Banerjee

et al

., 2012

,

2013

Tagliacozzo

et al., 2012

,

2013

Zohar,

Cirac

,

Reznik

,

2012

,

2013

Kasamatsu

et al., 2013

Superconducting

qubits

Marcos et al., 2013

Static gauge fields

Bermudez,

Schaetz

,

Porras

,

2011, 2012

Shi

,

Cirac

, 2012

High-energy physics in ions

Gerritsma

et al, 2010 (Dirac equation)

Casanova et al., 2011 (coupled quantum fields)

Casanova et al., 2012 (

Majorana

equation)

Thank you !