/
Social science: The basics Social science: The basics

Social science: The basics - PowerPoint Presentation

marina-yarberry
marina-yarberry . @marina-yarberry
Follow
396 views
Uploaded On 2015-09-27

Social science: The basics - PPT Presentation

An introduction to the application of scientific method to human behavior Knowledge What does knowledge allow us to do Predict Control Understand Beattys unscientific sources of knowledge Intuition ID: 142423

social variable science study variable social study science play people game gender human video violent behavior concepts knowledge dependent

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Social science: The basics" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Social science: The basics

An introduction to the application of scientific method to human behaviorSlide2

Knowledge

What does knowledge allow us to do?

Predict

Control

UnderstandSlide3

Beatty’s unscientific sources of knowledge

Intuition

Tenacity

Common sense

Personal experience

Authority

RationalismSlide4

So what are we to do?

Develop ways to reduce the bias and improve our ability to observe

‘Science’ as a means to systematically study the world

First developed in ‘hard’ or ‘natural’ sciences

Human beings were not the object of study

Study moves from description to classification to correlation to ‘causality’Slide5

Science

Draws upon the other sources of knowledge

Systematically tests ideas in the empirical world

Precise

Objective

CumulativeSlide6

Appropriate for some but

not all questions

Are Muslims violent?

Would young children learn more from watching educational videos or from unstructured play?

Do people use the Internet more for entertainment or for social contact?

What is the meaning of life?

Should the government license websites?

Does advertising make us feel ugly?

What colors should I wear together?Slide7

Empiricism

The kind of evidence that we gather in science is ‘empirical’ evidence

Drawn from our interaction with the physical world

Science structures experience in ways that help us to improve on the lessons we learn from the ‘real world’Slide8

Social science

Scientific study applied to human behavior did not really get going till the 1800s

Excitement over the successes of natural sciences

Industrial machinery

Vaccines against disease

Optics

Astronomical discoveries

NavigationSlide9

Development of social science

There was a heated controversy over the appropriateness of the scientific study of people

Religious/ethical concerns over the ethics of trying to study people

Scientific debate over whether humans act according to ‘laws’ of behavior the way inanimate objects do

This debate continuesSlide10

Positivism

From the beginning of the 20

th

century until the latter half of the century, social sciences favored an approach that said that the proper approach to the study of human behavior was to adopt the methods and philosophy dominant in natural sciences.

Empirical

Hypothetico-deductive

“Nomothetic”Slide11

Covering laws

Scholars during the first half of the 20

th

century were concerned with attempting to identify the limited number of laws that explained all human behavior.

Slide12

Over time, their frustration, coupled with an increasing understanding of the uncertainty even of natural sciences led to an abandonment of the attempt by most social scientists.Slide13

More recent developments

An approach that accepts some level of uncertainty in the prediction and understanding of human behavior was adopted (“Post-positivism”)

Note: a ‘probabilistic’ model was adopted (

Trochim

)Slide14

The new view of social science

Social scientists recognize that absolute ‘covering laws’ of human beliefs, attitudes and behaviors are probably not there to be found

Instead, relationships among variables are seen as partial and contingent upon circumstances, personalities, etc.Slide15

How we study human action with social science methods

Social scientists attempt to develop theory by generalizing from a number of individual cases or examples

Induction

They then make predictions from the general rules to a new set of events or cases

Deduction

They test their predictions

With the knowledge gained from the tests, they reconsider the generalizations they made

The process begins again (continuous)Slide16

Social science community

The development of knowledge in a discipline is a community undertaking

The best approximation to truth is attained through multiple researchers applying different theories and methods to the same questions

Scientists act as a profession, policing each other and critiquing each other’s theories and research

Conferences, etc. bring researchers looking at similar problems togetherSlide17

Goals of social science

In modern study of social science topics, the goal, generally speaking, is to develop probabilistic theories by identifying

relationships

among

concepts

Concepts are generalized ideas that refer to

a number of individual cases Slide18

Relationships

The two most common types of relationships in research are

Correlational

—two concepts are related so that variance in one

coincides with

variance in another

Causal—two concepts are related so that variance in one

leads to

variance in the otherSlide19

Examples: Correlation

If you find that people who use illegal drugs at an early age watch druggie movies, it could be either that

kids exposed to druggie movies are more likely to use drugs at an early age or

kids who use drugs at an early age are attracted to druggie moviesSlide20

Examples: Causality

If you find that exposure to pro-abstinence messages

leads to

later onset of sexual behavior but not vice versa, and there is no other plausible explanation for the relationship, then you conclude that you have a causal relationshipSlide21

Representing relationships

Drug movies

Drug use

Exposure to

pro-abstinence

messages

Onset of sexual activity

__

+Slide22

Basic theoretical statement

Gender self-definition

Violent video

game play

DeterminesSlide23

Concepts and variables

Variables are concepts that take more than one value

Otherwise, they are a ‘constant’

E.g., the star that the Earth revolves aroundSlide24

Basic research statement

Gender identity

Violent video

game play

Independent Variable

Dependent Variable

Relationship

:

DeterminesSlide25

Antecedent variable

Gender

identity

Violent video

game play

Independent Variable

Dependent Variable

Social construction

of gender

Antecedent VariableSlide26

Mediating variable

Gender identity

Violent video

game play

Independent Variable

Dependent Variable

Parents’ political

liberalism

Mediating VariableSlide27

Intervening Variable

Gender

identity

Violent video

game play

Independent Variable

Dependent Variable

Personal

aggressiveness

Intervening VariableSlide28

Confound—“third variable” explanation

Gender

identity

Violent video

game play

Independent Variable

Dependent Variable

Hormonal balance

Antecedent Variable

X

X

XSlide29

It can get quite complicated

Papies

,

Dominik

, and Michel Clement. "Adoption of New Movie Distribution Services on the Internet."

Journal of Media Economics 21.3 (2008): 131-57.Slide30

It can get quite complicated

Papies

,

Dominik

, and Michel Clement. "Adoption of New Movie Distribution Services on the Internet."

Journal of Media Economics 21.3 (2008): 131-57.Slide31

Paek

,

Hye

-Jin. "Mechanisms through Which Adolescents Attend and Respond to Antismoking Media Campaigns."

Journal of Communication 58.1 (2008): 84-105.Slide32

Some variables to

play around with

Gender

Sex

Age

Education

Interest

in technology

Video Game Play

Game genre preference

Game playing skill

Sociability

(Tendency toward interaction with others, friendships)

Enjoyment

of fantasy

Social conservatism

Psychological compulsion

Sports

experience

Income

Film genre preferenceSlide33

Why social science faces

special challenges

The trouble with peopleSlide34

People are hard to study because:

They think

(and we don’t have direct access to their minds)Slide35

People are hard to study because:

They don’t simply react to your stimulus

They try to guess what you’re doing and anticipate what your goal is

They may intentionally help or hinder your goal (as they see it)

They are affected by a wide range of things in their environment

You can’t control all the things that might affect your subjectsSlide36

People are hard to study because:

They are complicated

They are emotional

They forget

They change over time

Individuals are very different

They can be uncooperativeSlide37

People are hard to study because:

Ethics limit what you can do to study them