/
Stratiform   vs  Convective Stratiform   vs  Convective

Stratiform vs Convective - PowerPoint Presentation

marina-yarberry
marina-yarberry . @marina-yarberry
Follow
401 views
Uploaded On 2018-02-01

Stratiform vs Convective - PPT Presentation

Ref Vel stratiform Convall radref Cloud analysis followed by 3dvar Convuv spd rw Only 3dvar analysis Applied DFI to Qv only other mosit variable like Qs Qc Qr Qg Qi are remain unchanged and ID: 626931

stratiform convective conv ref convective stratiform ref conv dfi grid analysis start cold cold061515 vel 3dvar gfs applied cold061603

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Stratiform vs Convective" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Stratiform vs ConvectiveSlide2
Slide3

Ref+Vel

stratiform

Conv(all)+ rad_ref

Cloud analysis followed by 3dvar

Conv(uv+spd)+rw

Only 3dvar analysis

Applied DFI to Qv only, other mosit variable like Qs, Qc, Qr, Qg, Qi are remain unchanged and

Temperature tendency added gradually (Current RUC version)

CV(Ref+Vel)

convective

The same above

The same above

The same above

Cld_qv

Qcw

and

Qci

use Convective method and

Qv

using the

stratiform

or convective

method, and all of these

based on the classification.

The same above

The same above

The same above

Cldall

all

using the stratiform or convective method based on the classification.

The same above

The same above

The same aboveSlide4

Qn

(Convective) –

Qn

(

Stratiform

) 700hPaSlide5

Qn

(Convective) –

Qn

(

Stratiform

) 500hPaSlide6

Qcw

(Convective) –

Qcw

(

Stratiform

)

tmc

(Convective) –

tmc

(

Stratiform

)Slide7

Classify methods

Steiner et al. 1995

(1). RefZ3km>40dbz

(2). RefZ3km-Z

bg

> 10 – Z

2

bg /180

here, Zbg is average of Ref at 3 km height 11 km around the computer grid.

(3)any grid point identified as a convective center by one of above two criteria, all surrounding grid points within an intensity-dependent convective radius around that grid point are also included as convective area

But considering the grid resolution of RR is 13 km , we only applied the rule (1) and (2).Slide8

Observed reflectivity at 3km from 2006061518- 2006061618Slide9

SHY95 resultSlide10
Slide11

Case name

GSI

DFI

Cloud analysis

First pass

Default value

Second pass

¼ of default value

Moist variable which applied dfi

Novar_cold061515

No

gsi

Wrf office version dfi, with dfi_radar=0

Novar_cold061603

The same above but cold start from GFS from 061603

Conv_cold061515

stratiform

Conv(all)

none

Applied DFI to Qv only, other mosit variable like Qs, Qc, Qr, Qg, Qi are remain unchanged and

Temperature tendency added gradually (Current RUC version)

Conv_cold061603

The same above but cold start from GFS from 061603

Ref_cold061515

stratiform

Conv

(all)+

rad_ref

Cloud analysis followed by 3dvar

none

The same above

Ref_ cold061603

The same above but cold start from GFS from 061603

Ref+Vel_cold061515

stratiform

Conv(all)+ rad_refCloud analysis followed by 3dvarConv(uv+spd)+rwOnly 3dvar analysisThe same aboveRef+Vel_ cold061603 The same above but cold start from GFS from 061603

Cold start intervalSlide12
Slide13
Slide14
Slide15

High resolution

Lack of data?