Long Term Trends Bringing Tension Between England and the Colonies by the 1760s Trends Bringing Tension I Increasing power of colonial legislature 5 colonies in particular New York Massachusetts Pennsylvania Virginia S Carolina ID: 700559
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The Road to Revolution Chapter 7" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
The Road to Revolution
Chapter 7Slide2
Long Term Trends Bringing Tension Between England and the Colonies by the 1760sSlide3
Trends Bringing Tension
I. Increasing power of colonial legislature (5 colonies in particular: New York, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Virginia, S. Carolina).
Governor has significant power, but restrictions are placed on Governors by British govt., and most colonial Governors will have only limited patronage (not many jobs to give to their supporters).Slide4
Trends Bringing Tension
Colonial legislature has more and more control over many in the colonies (raising money and spending money).
Increasingly gain control over the Governor’s salary.
Legislatures gain increased control over elections (when held, where, who can vote, etc.)
Colonial legislature gets to elect officials to go to England and meet with Parliament about matters relating to the colonies.Slide5
Trends Bringing Tension
Control the release of news to the general public (spin news how they want in colonies).
II. Increase in consumerism in the colonies from England.
Between 1750-1773, the value of imports increases 120%.
Am increasing number of colonists are going into debt trying to buy these goods.
Some religious leaders thought the colonies were morally superior to England and that mercantilism was not good for the coloniesSlide6
Trends Bringing Tension
III. A series of major religious revivals between 1720-1770.
The Great Awakening beings in the 1720s (New Jersey) then spreads to New England, the to South and frontier.
Membership to churches increases, but people reject the Puritan ideas (pre-destination) and emphasize free choice.
Emphasis on the emotional experience of conversion, “Heart over Mind”.Slide7
Trends Bringing Tension
This is significant because the Great Awakening challenges traditional ideas and leaders and soon challenges secular leaders.
IV. Population of colonial America dramatically increases in 18
th
Century.
250,000 colonies in 1700; 1.2 million by 1750; 2.5 million by 1776.
The increase made it difficult to acquire abundant cheap land east of the Appalachians (Georgia to Northern Massachusetts).Slide8
Trends Bringing Tension
Parents could no longer give land to their children at 21, and they could no longer use promise of land as a way to control their children.
They were increasingly unable to control children’s sexual behavior before marriage.
In Hingham, MA
in 1700
, 10% of women were pregnant when they got married.
In 1750, 30% of women were pregnant when they got married.Slide9
Introduction
After winning the 7 Year’s War the British sent 10,000 troops to guard the American frontier- which was very costly.
The London government struggled to compel the American colonists to shoulder some of the financial costs of the empire.Slide10
Introduction
This change in British colonial policy reinforced an emerging sense of American political identity and helped to precipitate the American Revolution.
Even so, the Americans were reluctant revolutionaries.Slide11
The Deep Roots of Revolution
Even from day one the New World nurtured new ideas about the nature of society, citizen, and government.
Two main ideas had taken root in the minds of American colonists by the mid-eighteenth century.Slide12
Republicanism
A just society was one in which all citizens willingly subordinated their private, selfish interests to the common good.
The stability of society and the authority of government depended on the virtue of the citizenry.
By its nature, republicanism was opposed to hierarchical and authoritarian institutions such as aristocracy and monarchy.Slide13
Radical Whigs
The 2
nd
idea came from the British commentators known as radical Whigs.
The Whigs feared that threat to liberty posed by the arbitrary power of monarch and his ministers relative to elected representatives in Parliament.Slide14
Radical Whigs
Whigs warned citizens to be on guard against corruption and loss of liberties.
Together, republican and Whig ideas taught the American colonists to be on high alert against any threat to their liberty.
The American colonists had grown accustomed to running their own affairs.Slide15
Mercantilism and Colonial Grievances
Not one of the original 13 colonies except GA was formally planted by the British government.
The British authorities tried to justify their colonial control over the colonies through the theory of mercantilism.Slide16
Mercantilism and Colonial Grievances
Mercantilists believe that wealth was power and that a country’s economic wealth (and military and political power) could be measured by the amount of gold or silver in its treasury.
Possessing colonies gave England a distinct advantage; they had somewhere that could supply raw materials to the mother country and the colonies could provide a guaranteed market for exports.Slide17
Mercantilism and Colonial Grievances
From time to time, Parliament passed laws to regulate the mercantilist system in the colonies.
British policy also inflicted a currency shortage on the colonies.
To facilitate everyday purchases, the colonists resorted to using butter, nails, pitch (resin), and feathers for exchange purposes.Slide18
Mercantilism and Colonial Grievances
Currency issues came to a boil when dire financial need forced many of the colonies to issue paper money, which was swiftly depreciated.
The British crown also reserved the right to nullify any legislation passed by the colonial assemblies if such laws worked mischief with the mercantilist system.
Although this veto was rarely used, the colonists resented its very existence.Slide19
The Merits and Menace of Mercantilism
Even though mercantilism seemed oppressive, the truth is that the Navigation Laws were only loosely enforced.
Many American fortunes, including that of John Hancock, were amassed by smuggling.Slide20
The Merits and Menace of Mercantilism
The colonists reaped the benefits of the mercantile system;
London paid liberally for ship parts made in the colonies, much to the dismay of London builders.
VA tobacco planters enjoyed a monopoly and ran the tiny British tobacco industry out of business,.
The colonists benefitted from protection of the world’s strongest army and navy- without spending a penny
for it.Slide21
The Merits and Menace of Mercantilism
The problems with mercantilism
Stifled economic initiative and imposed dependency on British
Kept the colonists in a state of perpetual economic adolescence.
According to Theodore Roosevelt years later, “Revolution broke out because Britain failed to recognize an emerging nation when it saw one.”Slide22
The Stamp Tax Uproar
Even though they emerged victorious from the 7 Year’s War, the British also emerged with a new debt, half of which was spent defending the colonies.
In 1763, British Prime Minister George Grenville ordered strict enforcement of the Navigation Laws.
In 1764, he got Parliament to pass the Sugar Act.Slide23
The Stamp Tax Uproar
This was the first time tax revenue was ever sought from colonies for the crown.
Amid resentment, the tax was lowered and anger died considerably.
In 1765, the Quartering Act was passed, which required certain colonies to provide food and quarters for British troops.Slide24
The Stamp Tax Uproar
Also in 1765, Grenville passed the Stamp Tax to raise revenue for a new military force.
Stamps were required on bills of sale for about 50 trade items as well, as commercial and legal documents, playing cards, pamphlets, newspapers, diplomas, marriage licenses, etc.Slide25
The Stamp Tax Uproar
Grenville was asking the colonists to pay their fair share for the cost of their protection.
The British people had endured a stamp tax in England that was much higher than that levied in the colonies.
The colonists felt Grenville was striking at liberties they had assumed as a matter of right.Slide26
The Stamp Tax Uproar
Because the offenders were tried in admiralty court, where no juries were allowed and people were seen as guilty until proven innocent, the Sugar and Stamp Acts jeopardized the basic rights of the colonists.
Also, colonists were skeptical that a new army was needed in America after the French had been removed.Slide27
The Stamp Tax Uproar
The cries of “No taxation without representation” began to ring free.
They agreed that Parliament had the right to levy taxes, but they did not feel it had the right to do so without having any Americans seated in Parliament.
Only their own elected colonial legislature, in their minds, had the right to tax them.Slide28
The Stamp Tax Uproar
Grenville felt that the Americans
were
represented in Parliament through the theory of “virtual representation,” where every member of Parliament represented all British subjects, even those in America.
The colonists scoffed at virtual representation and truthfully, didn’t want representation in Parliament either
.Slide29
The Stamp Tax Uproar
When the British replied that they could not split sovereign power between “legislative” authority in London and “taxing” authority in the colonies, they forced the Americans to deny the authority of Parliament altogether.
This chain of logic eventually led, link by link, to revolutionary consequences.Slide30
Forced Repeal of the Stamp Act
The Stamp Act Congress was formed in 1765 by 27 delegates from 9 colonies.
They distinguished members debated and then drew up a statement of rights and grievances for the king and Parliament.
Although it was dismissed in England, it became important in the colonies because it first brought together around the same table leaders from different and rival colonies.Slide31
Forced Repeal of the Stamp Act
More effective was the adoption of nonimportation agreements against British goods.
These agreements spontaneously united the American people for the first time in common action.Slide32
Forced Repeal of the Stamp Act
Out of nonimportation agreement protests grew vigilante groups such as the Sons of Liberty and the Daughters of Liberty.
Mobs of Sons and Daughters ransacked the homes of custom officials, confiscated their money, tarred and feathered the officials, and hanged effigies of stamp agents on liberty poles.Slide33
Forced Repeal of the Stamp Act
Stamp agents were so scared that no one stepped in to take over the vacant jobs and no stamps were sold.
The British economy was hit hard as the colonists accounted for ½ of all British shipping.
In 1766, Parliament grudgingly repealed the Stamp Act as the colonists rejoiced and even built a statue to King George III in New York.Slide34
Forced Repeal of the Stamp Act
The victory was short lived as, almost within the same breath, the Declaratory Act was passed.
This act reaffirmed Parliament’s right “to bind” the colonies “in all cases whatsoever.”
In a few years, the statue of King George was melted down to make bullets fired at his own troops.Slide35
The Townshend Tea Tax and the Boston “Massacre”
“Champagne Charley” Charles Townshend promised to pluck the feathers fro the colonial goose with a minimum of squawking.
In 1767, he persuaded Parliament to pass the Townshend Acts, which placed a light import duty on glass, whit lead, paper, paint, and tea.
The colonists were even more upset to find out that the money from these taxes went to pay the salaries of the royal governors and judges in America.Slide36
The Townshend Tea Tax and the Boston “Massacre”
The worst fears of the colonists were realized when the London government suspended the legislature of New York in 167 for failure to comply with the Quartering Act.
On March 5, 1770, a crowd of 60 townspeople began taunting and throwing snowballs at a squad of 10 redcoats.
The colonists were still enraged about the shooting death of an 11 year old during a protest.Slide37
The Townshend Tea Tax and the Boston “Massacre”
Acting without orders, but apparently provoked by the crowd, the troops opened fire and killed or wounded eleven citizens.
One of the first to die was
Crispus
Attucks, who was “mulatto” and the leader of the mob.
Both sides were to blame and the prosecution was only able to bring a guilty verdict of manslaughter on 2 troops (defended by future U.S. President John Adams).Slide38
The Seditious Committees of Correspondence
The ill-timed Townshend Acts failed to produce revenue, but it did produce a near rebellion.
Net proceeds in one year of tax was 295 pounds sterling, whereas British military costs in the colonies was 170,000 pounds sterling.
The Townshend Acts were repealed, but the three-pence toll on tea remained, just to remind the colonists of Parliament’s right to tax.Slide39
The Seditious Committees of Correspondence
In 1772, Samuel Adams organized the committees of correspondence in Boston and 28 towns followed suit.
The chief function was to spread the spirit of resistance by exchanging letters and keep alive opposition to British policy.
By 1773, each colony had a committee to exchange ideas and information with other colonies.
They evolved directly into the first American congressesSlide40
Tea Brewing in Boston
By 1773, nothing happened that made rebellion inevitable.
Nonimportation was weakening.
People were paying the tea tax, because taxed tea was cheaper than smuggled tea.
The British East India Company was burdened with 17 million pounds of unsold tea, and was facing bankruptcy.Slide41
Tea Brewing in Boston
The British government granted the BEIC a monopoly over the tea sold in the colonies.
This, although making the tea cheaper, was met with resistance by the colonists.
In Philadelphia and New York, the ships were forced to return to England with their holds full.
In Annapolis, citizens burned the cargo and ship.Slide42
Tea Brewing in Boston
Governor Thomas Hutchinson of Boston (who had his home destroyed by stamp Act protestors) ordered the ships on to budge until they unloaded their cargo.
On December 16, 1773, 100 Bostonians, loosely disguised as Indians, boarded the ships, smashed open 342 chests of tea, and dumped their contents in the AtlanticSlide43
Parliament Passes the “Intolerable Acts”
In 1774, Parliament passed a series of acts designed to chastise Boston in particular.
The most drastic was the Boston Port Act, which closed Boston Harbor until damages from the Tea Party were repaid.Slide44
Parliament Passes the “Intolerable Acts”
Other “Intolerable Acts” swept away the chartered rights of colonial Massachusetts.
Officials who killed colonists in the line of duty could be sent to Britain for trial (where they would likely be let off scot-free).
The new Quartering Act allowed British officials to house soldiers anywhere, even in private homes.Slide45
Parliament Passes the “Intolerable Acts”
The Quebec Act in 1774 felt like a slap in the face to many Americans.
This act allowed the 60,000+ French still residing in Canada the right to keep their old customs and institutions.
It also extended the province of Quebec southward into the Ohio River Valley.Slide46
Bloodshed
The other colonies rallied around Mass. And sent food to the colony.
In 1774, the First Continental Congress met in
Phila
. To find ways to redress colonial grievances.
12 of the 13 colonies were present (only GA was not) and represented by 55 well-respected men (Adams, Adams, Washington, Henry, etc.).Slide47
Bloodshed
The First CC met for 7 weeks, from September 5 to October 26, 1774.
John Adams was the most important man in the room as he moved his colleagues from a proposal by the moderates to have American home rule under direction from the British to a revolutionary course.
The congress drew up papers such as the Declaration of Rights, as well as appeals to other British American colonies, the king, and the British people.Slide48
Bloodshed
Most importantly, The Association was created.
The Association called for a complete boycott of British goods: nonimportation,
nonexportation
, and
nonconsumption
, but they still were not calling for independence.
If colonial grievances were redressed, it was great, but if they were not, the Congress would meet again in May 1775.Slide49
Bloodshed
The petitions were rejected in Parliament.
Violators of The Association were tarred and feathered in the colonies.
In April 1775, a detachment of English troops was sent to Lexington and Concord to seize a store of colonial gunpowder and also bag the rebel leaders; Samuel Adams and John Hancock.Slide50
Bloodshed
The colonial “Minute Men” refused to disperse and shots were fired.
8 Americans were killed and several more were wounded.
The redcoats pushed on to Concord, where they were forced to retreat.
70 British were killed and 300 wounded.
The Revolutionary War was on.Slide51
Imperial Strength and Weakness
English Statistics
7.5 million people
More money
Strongest naval power in the world
50,000 professional soldiers, 30,000 German “Hessian” soldiers, 50,000 American Loyalists.Slide52
Imperial Strength and Weakness
American Statistics
2.5 million people
Had help from France
Problems in Ireland required many British soldiers
Many Britons didn’t want to fight their American “cousins”.
British military orders were sent from 3,000 miles away and often did not fit the changing situations
There was no urban nerve center where defeat would cripple the expansive country.Slide53
Imperial Strength and Weakness
Britain had 2
nd
rate generals and soldiers who were treated brutally.
British armies captured every American city of any size, but it didn’t really make a dent in American defenses.
The Americans were willing to trade space for time.
Benjamin Franklin calculated that during Bunker Hill, in which 150 Patriots were captured and killed, 60,000 American babies were born.Slide54
American Pluses and Minuses
American Advantages
George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, and Marquis de Lafayette
The colonies were largely self-sustaining due to agriculture.
Colonists had the moral advantage of believing in a just causeSlide55
American Pluses and Minuses
American Disadvantages
Poor organization for war.
States who thought of themselves as sovereign resented Congress’s flimsy powers.
There were sectional disputes over military leadership.
Paper money was printed in excess and depreciated in value quickly.Slide56
A Thin Line of Heroes
When British money stopped flowing into the colonies, so did British protection of the colonies.
Colonists now faced a serious question; where were weapons and supplies going to come from?
When British material support evaporated, the cost of weapons and supplies in the colonies mounted.Slide57
A Thin Line of Heroes
At Valley Forge, PA soldiers went without bread for 3 consecutive days in the winter of 1777-1778.
Clothing and shoes were also in short supply.
During one period at Valley Forge 2,800 men were barefoot or nearly naked.Slide58
A Thin Line of Heroes
The militiamen were numerous, but also highly unreliable.
These several hundred thousand men were very unskilled and also woefully undertrained.
The regulars in the Continental Army were also undertrained, but many were highly skilled by war’s end.Slide59
A Thin Line of Heroes
By war’s end more than 5,000 Blacks enlisted in the American armed forces.
Most of these soldiers were free blacks from the North.
African Americans also served on the British side as well.
Lord Dunmore issued a proclamation promising freedom for any VA African who fought for the British.Slide60
A Thin Line of Heroes
At the war’s end 14,000 “Black Loyalists” were evacuated to Nova Scotia, Jamaica, and England.
The rebel cause was undermined by business owners in the colonies selling to the British because they could afford to pay in gold.Slide61
A Thin Line of Heroes
Even though Washington never had any more than 20,000 soldiers in one place at one time, could have easily eclipsed that number if colonists had thrown themselves into the fray
.
Truth be told, only a minority of American colonists attached themselves to the cause of independence with a spirit of selfless devotion.
Seldom have so few done so much for so many.