PPT-What’s New in Patent Damages?

Erik Puknys   Partner   Finnegan Karen Robinson Director of Litigation Adobe Kim Schenk   Principal Charles River Associates Patrick Weston  Senior Litigation Counsel . March 17, 2015. Donald M. Cameron. Relief Typically Sought. Declaration as to . Validity. Infringement. Injunction. Damages, or. Accounting of profits. Delivery up or destruction. Costs. Interest . The Exclusive Right – Section 42. for Demand Letters. HEA. . 1102- Bad . Faith Assertions of . Patent . Infringement. Indiana- Patent Troll Statute- Demand Letters . HEA. 1102- “Bad Faith Assertions of Patent Infringement”. Effective: July 1, 2015 . Judge Bryson. Chief Judge Clark. Judge . Gilstrap. Judge Love. Steve Williams. Bo Davis & Alan Ratliff, Moderators. OUTLINE. 2015 Federal Circuit Patent Damages Roundup: 8 in :08. Reasonable Royalty: Trends in Apportionment. & Recent Case . in Korea. Hee-Young JEONG. Judge of Daejeon District Court, KOREA. April 22, 2015. The IPR Litigation System. Intellectual Property Tribunal. (IPT; Administrative Agency). Supreme Court. Gerard Haddad. Dickstein Shapiro. Jonathan Putnam, PhD. Charles River Associates. 2. Uniloc v. Microsoft. “This court now holds as a matter of Federal Circuit law that the 25 percent rule of thumb is a fundamentally flawed tool for determining a baseline royalty rate in a hypothetical negotiation.”. Nisha Mody. nmody@oskr.com. Who Proffers Damages. Usually Plaintiffs hire one expert and Defendants hire another. Both are independent. Experts usually are . Economists . Financial Experts (CFA designation) . Presented by David Neal. © 2016 Workman Nydegger. Outline. Halo v. Pulse . Is the Seagate Test Consistent with 35 U.S. Code . § . 284?. Overview:. History . of Enhanced Damages. Underwater Devices v. Morrison-Knudsen and Opinions of Counsel. & Recent Case . in Korea. Hee-Young JEONG. Judge of Daejeon District Court, KOREA. April 22, 2015. The IPR Litigation System. Intellectual Property Tribunal. (IPT; Administrative Agency). Supreme Court. for . AIPLA Corporate Practice Committee. Susan Kirsch, Partner. October 2015 . A Comparison of the UK, German, and French Patent Courts. United Kingdom. The European Courts - UK court structure. Court of Appeal. November 2, 2017. Chris Regan. cregan@allendyer.com. Why IP?. Typically a small or start-up business cannot successfully enter and remain in a market on a low cost basis, as low cost is usually associated with large capital resources and resulting economies of scale. . Halo v. Pulse. June 15, 2017. MNACCA In-House Counsel Conference. Jason Zucchi. Principal. Fish & Richardson P.C.. Topics for Discussion. INSIGHTS. Litigation Webinar Series. 2. The new . Halo . April 18, 2018. Justin A. Hendrix. , . Partner. , . Finnegan. Doug . Lumish. , . Partner. , Latham & Watkins LLP. Kim . Schenk. , . Principal. , Charles River Associates. Darin Snyder. , . Partner. December 14, 2017. Karen Boyd, Turner Boyd. Daralyn Durie, Durie Tangri. Leah Waterland, Cisco Systems, Inc.. Moderator: Gregory Pinsonneault, . LitiNomics. . Apportionment. 2. Why apportion?. What is the correct royalty base?. Design Patent Damages After The Supreme Court + The Truth About Design Patents and Anticipation 19 th Annual Berkeley-Stanford Advanced Patent Law Institute December 6 & 7, 2018 Alan N. Herda, Partner