PPT-Image Annotation with Relevance Feedback

Inspirations ideas amp plans Motivation Ideal situation generalpurpose image annotation with unlimited vocabulary Reality Classifiers with limited vocabulary and dependency on labeled training data. for 2015 Baldrige Award Applicants . “Straight A” Feedback Comments. A. ctionable. . A. ccurate . A. dequate. A. ligned*. *. Added Emphasis in 2015. Actionable:. . relevant to the applicant’s key factors and specific enough that the organization can use the feedback to sustain or improve its . Multimedia Databases. via Relevance Feedback . with History and Foresight Support. DBRank. 08, April 12. th. 2008, . Cancún. , Mexico. Marc Wichterich. , Christian Beecks, Thomas Seidl. Outline. Motivation. By . Rong. Yan, Alexander G. and . Rong. Jin. Mwangi. S. . Kariuki. 2008-11629. Quiz. What’s Negative Pseudo-Relevance feedback in multimedia retrieval?. Introduction. As a result of high demand of content based access to video information.. 2011-11709. Seo. . Seok. . Jun. Abstract. Video information retrieval. Finding info. relevant to query. Approach. Pseudo-relevance feedback. Negative PRF. Questions. How this paper approach to content-based video retrieval. . Schütze. and Christina . Lioma. Lecture 9: Relevance Feedback & Query Expansion. 1. 2. Take-. away. . today. Interactive relevance feedback:. improve initial retrieval results by telling the IR system which docs are relevant / . Philip . McParlane. , Yashar Moshfeghi and Joemon M. Jose. University of Glasgow, UK. http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~philip/. p.mcparlane.1@research.gla.ac.uk. Motivation for annotating images. Problems with existing automatic image annotation collections. Authors: Joe Futrelle, Amber York. . @ Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. Imaging FlowCytobot. (Heidi Sosik et al). HabCam. (Scott . Gallager. et al). SeaBED. (. Hanumat. Singh et al). Phytoplankton . ConceptRank. Petra Budíková, Michal Batko, Pavel Zezula. Outline. Search-based annotation. Motivation. Problem formalization. Challenges. ConceptRank. Idea. Semantic network construction. PageRank and ConceptRank. Relevance Feedback: . Example. Initial Results. Search Engine. 2. Relevance Feedback: . Example. Relevance Feedback. Search Engine. 3. Relevance Feedback: . Example. Revised Results. Search Engine. 4. for Pseudo–Relevance Feedback . Yuanhua . Lv. . & . ChengXiang. . Zhai. Department of Computer Science, UIUC. Presented by Bo Man . 2014/11/18. Positional Relevance Model . for Pseudo–Relevance Feedback . Petra Bud. íková, FI MU. CEMI meeting, Plze. ň. , 1. 6. . . 4. . 2014. Formalization. The annotation problem is . defined by a . query image . I. . and a . vocabulary . V. of candidate concepts. (ideas for . joint journal paper). CEMI meeting, Praha, 14. 3. 2014. Outline. Introduction. Why annotations?. State-of-the-art in multimedia annotation. Search-based image annotation. What. . we. . Uri Avni , Tel Aviv University, Israel. Hayit. Greenspan Tel Aviv University, Israel. . Jacob Goldberger Bar . Ilan. University, Israel. Outline. Challenge description. Proposed system. Image representation. 1. 2. Take-. away. . today. Interactive relevance feedback:. improve initial retrieval results by telling the IR system which docs are relevant / . nonrelevant. Best known relevance feedback method: .