PPT-Comparison of INSTI vs EFV

Author : mediumgeneral | Published Date : 2020-06-16

STARTMRK GSUS2360102 SINGLE Walmsley S NEJM 2013369180718 Design Objective Non inferiority of DTG at W48 HIV RNA lt 50 cmL by intention to treat snapshot analysis

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Comparison of INSTI vs EFV" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Comparison of INSTI vs EFV: Transcript


STARTMRK GSUS2360102 SINGLE Walmsley S NEJM 2013369180718 Design Objective Non inferiority of DTG at W48 HIV RNA lt 50 cmL by intention to treat snapshot analysis 1sided significance level of 25 lower margin of . history, so that institutions once established have long-run effects on economic performance,and these effects linger even after the original institutions decay or disappear. This has beenalso confirm FLAMINGO. GS-236-0103. ACTG . A5257. WAVES. . Design. Objective. Non inferiority of DTG at W48: % HIV RNA < 50 c/mL by intention to treat, snapshot analysis (1-sided significance level of 2.5%, lower margin of the 95% CI for the difference = -12%, 90% power). FAT TAILSSPRING 2005 FLAMINGO. GS-236-0103. ACTG A5257. WAVES. ARIA . Design. Objective. Non inferiority of DTG/ABC/3TC at W48: % HIV RNA < 50 c/mL by intention. to treat, snapshot analysis (lower margin of the 2-sided 95% CI for the difference = - 12%). QDMRK. SPRING-2. ONCEMRK. ONCEMRK. Design. Objective. Non inferiority of RAL QD: % HIV RNA < 40 c/mL by ITT, NC=F . (lower margin of the 2-sided 95% CI for the difference = - 10%, 90% power). RAL 1200 mg ** QD + . FLAMINGO. GS-236-0103. ACTG A5257. WAVES . ARIA . Squires K. Lancet HIV 2016; 3(9):e410-e420. Design. Objective. Non inferiority of EVG/C/FTC/TDF at W48: % HIV RNA < 50 c/. mL. by intention. to treat, snapshot analysis (lower margin of the 2-sided 95% CI for the difference = -12%). Galatians 6:4-5 Message. Make a careful exploration of who you are and the work you have been given, and then sink yourself into that. Don’t be impressed with yourself. . Don’t compare yourself with others.. Question: . Compare how Wilfred Owen explores conflict In Dulce Decorum Est with one other poem. (We will do The Manhunt for the example and for the comparison practice in class) . Comparison: what to do? . Competitor Parts. Fairchild. FSL306LR. PI. LNK302,304,305,306. ST. VIPER 16, 06. MPS. MP150. NXP. TEA1721. Breakdown Voltage Comparison. Abs. Max. Breakdown Voltage. Recommended Max. FSL306LR. 650V. 650V. FLAMINGO. GS-236-0103. ACTG A5257. . WAVES. Lennox JL. Ann Intern Med 2014;161:461-71. ACTG A5257. Design. Objective. Evaluate regimen equivalence regarding . virologic. efficacy and tolerability over 96 weeks, by intention-to-treat analysis. Equivalence = 2-sided 97.5% CI on the . COMPARISON OF ADJECTIVES DEGREES OF COMPARISON DEGREES OF COMPARISON COMPARATIVE DEGREE (Grau Comparativo) Compara UM elemento com OUTRO . Nessa comparação poderá haver IGUALDADE, DESIGUALDADE, SUPERIORIDADE QDMRK. SPRING-2. ONCEMRK. GS-US-380-1489. GS-US-380-1490. GS-US-380-1490. Design. Objective. Non inferiority of BIC/F/TAF at W48: % HIV RNA < 50 c/mL by intention . to treat, snapshot analysis (lower margin of the 2-sided 95.002% CI for . Presented by Christine . Fragapane. , Travel Coordinator. June 5, 2017. Always create your flight comparison on same day as when flight is confirmed with Omega.. First:. Go into Concur . Select dates and times of travel with personal day(s) provided by the Traveler:. Dathan M. Byonanebye, Mark N. Polizzotto, Fernando Maltez, Andri Rauch, Katharina Grabmeier-Pfistershammer, Ferdinand Wit, Stéphane De Wit, Antonella Castagna, Antonella . D’Arminio. Monforte, Cristina Mussini, Jan-Christian Wasmuth, Eric .

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Comparison of INSTI vs EFV"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents