/
Task 10: Acquisitions  Improvement Support Task 10: Acquisitions  Improvement Support

Task 10: Acquisitions Improvement Support - PowerPoint Presentation

melanie
melanie . @melanie
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2022-02-12

Task 10: Acquisitions Improvement Support - PPT Presentation

February x 2016 Not for Public Release CFSAN Acquisition Liaison Branch Value Proposition Key Objectives Overall Value Proposition to Support ALB Improvement Summary of Stakeholder Groups ID: 908448

alb acquisition requirements stakeholder acquisition alb stakeholder requirements cfsan proposition change oags community program support staff quality amp rework

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Task 10: Acquisitions Improvement Suppo..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Task 10: Acquisitions Improvement Support

February

x

, 2016

Not for Public Release

CFSAN

Acquisition Liaison

Branch

Value Proposition

Slide2

Key Objectives

Overall Value Proposition to Support ALB ImprovementSummary of Stakeholder GroupsDerived value by each Stakeholder Group

How Change will be achieved

2

Slide3

Why is change required?ALB cannot totally fulfill its intended purpose

Liaison between requirements community and OAGSPre-SolicitationSolicitation & Quality SurveillanceSource Selection

Post AwardWhat will change?Increased resourcesRequisite training for personnelAppropriate skill set of personnel

Single POC for Stakeholder issues| 3 | Overall Value Proposition

Slide4

Benefits of ChangeALB will fulfill its intended purpose

Acquisition documentation forwarded to OAGS will not require reworkRequirements community will not have to go directly to OAGSLiaison between requirements community and OAGS

Ultimately ALB will be the “One Stop Shop” model for FDAThe “Go To” shop for any acquisition support and/or consultation outside of OAGS cognizance

| 4 | Overall Value Proposition

Slide5

Program OfficesOAGS

CORsFDA

| 5

|Summary of Stakeholder Groups

Slide6

Program OfficesTimely requirements executionTimely obligation of funds

Acquisition document rework mitigationImproved skills of personnelOAGSReduced work effort from need to rework submitted acquisition packages

Improved relationship with Program OfficesCORsClear direction of responsibilitiesRequisite and current trainingFDA

Model ALB for others to duplicateOne Stop Shop| 6 |Derived Value by each Stakeholder Group

Slide7

Increase in ALB resources is imperativeDetermine expertise required for ALBCertification

GS-SeriesExperienceCreate an environment envy of workforceImproves recruiting and retentionIncrease quantity and quality of CORs

TrainingFAC-CDAUStaff College

| 7 |How Will Change Be Achieved

Slide8

Backup Slides

8

Slide9

|

9 |

ALB Goals/Objectives

Operate effectively and efficiently and more affordably for CFSAN requirements.Bundle products and services for best value procurement.Remain dependable, reliable, responsiveReinforce relevance to CFSAN customers, stakeholders, mission and operations.Orchestrate complex and inter-dependent requirements.Build innovative solutions and streamlined acquisition procedures.Create a hub for FDA staff to bring together in one place. Coordinate collaborative learning for ALB staff.Enhance CFSAN presence through partnerships and collaboration.

Slide10

FY15 Recap:Acquisition

10

Recommendations:

Refresh Skills of ALB StaffCommence Acquisition Cycle SoonerRe-Organize and Increase ALB StaffInstitute Functions to Control Package CycleUtilize Templates/Examples & ChecklistsEstablish Agreements with Partners

Slide11

|

11 |

Slide12

|

12 |

Comparative Descriptive FDA Acquisition Data

NOTE: This is NOT an Apples to Apples comparison – each acquisition function can operate very differently which would explain different staff profiles of ALB type functions