F ermionic and Bosonic Topological Insulators possible Connection to Standard Model and Gravitational Anomalies Cenke Xu 许岑珂 University of California Santa Barbara Outline Outline ID: 280438
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Interacting" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Interacting Fermionic and Bosonic Topological Insulators, possible Connection to Standard Model and Gravitational Anomalies
Cenke
Xu
许岑珂
University of California, Santa BarbaraSlide2
Outline:Outline:Part 1: Interacting
Topological Superconductor and Possible Origin of 16n chiral fermions in Standard Model
Part 2: Gravitational Anomalies and
Bosonic
phases with Gapless boundary and Trivial bulk without assuming any symmetry.Slide3
Interacting TSC and Possible Origin of 16n chiral fermions in Standard ModelCollaborators:
Postdoc: Group member:
Yi-Zhuang You Yoni
BenTov
Very helpful discussions with
Joe
Polchinski
, Mark Srednicki, Robert Sugar, Xiao-Gang Wen, Alexei Kitaev, Tony Zee…….
Wen
,
arXiv:1305.1045, You,
BenTov
, Xu,
arXiv:1402.4151,
Kitaev
, unpublishedSlide4
Interacting
TSC
and Possible Origin of 16n chiral fermions in Standard Model
Motivation:
Current understanding of interacting TSC:
Interaction may not lead to any new topological superconductor, but it can definitely “
reduce
” the classification of topological superconductor, i.e. interaction can drive some
noninteracting
TSC trivial, in other words,
interaction can gap out the boundary of some
noninteracting
TSC, without breaking any symmetry
.
1
. Finding an application for interacting topological superconductors, especially a non-industry application;
2
.
Many high energy physicists are studying CMT using high energy techniques, we need to return the favor.Slide5
Interacting
TSC
and Possible Origin of 16n chiral fermions in Standard Model
Weyl
/chiral fermions:
Weyl
fermions can be gapped out by pairing:Slide6
Interacting
TSC
and Possible Origin of 16n chiral fermions in Standard Model
Very high energy In Standard Model (higher than EW unification energy), every generation has (effectively) 16 massless Left chiral fermions coupled with gauge field (
spinor
rep of SO(10) in GUT
):
This theory is difficult to regularize on a 3d lattice. Because on a 3d lattice, if we want to realize left fermions, we also get right fermions coupled to the same gauge theory
For example:
Weyl
semimetal has both left, and right
Weyl
fermions in the 3d BZ:Slide7
Interacting
TSC
and Possible Origin of 16n chiral fermions in Standard Model
Very high energy In Standard Model (higher than EW unification energy), every generation has (effectively) 16 massless Left chiral fermions coupled with gauge
field
(
spinor
rep of SO(10) in GUT
):
Popular alternative: Realize chiral fermions on the 3d boundary of a 4d topological insulator/superconductor
3d boundary,
16 chiral fermions
Mirror sector
This theory is difficult to regularize on a 3d lattice. Because on a 3d lattice, if we want to realize left fermions, we also get right fermions coupled to the same gauge theorySlide8
However, this approach requires a subtle adjustment of the fourth dimension. If the fourth dimension is too large, there will be gapless photons in the bulk; if the fourth dimension is too small, the mirror sector on the other boundary will interfere.
Mirror sector
Key question: Can we gap out the mirror sector (chiral fermions on the other boundary) without affecting the SM at all?
This cannot be done in the standard way (spontaneous symmetry breaking, condense a boson that couples to the mirror fermion mass)
3d boundary,
16 chiral fermions
Interacting
TSC
and Possible Origin of 16n chiral fermions in Standard ModelSlide9
A different question:
C
an we gap out the mirror sector with short range interaction, while
Mirror sector,
gapped by interaction
If this is possible, then only16 left fermions survive at low energy.
3d boundary,
16 chiral fermions
Interacting
TSC
and Possible Origin of 16n chiral fermions in Standard Model
Our conclusion: this is only possible with 16 chiral fermions, i.e. classification of 4d TSC is reduced by interaction
0
+
infty
gapless
gappedSlide10
0d boundary of 1d TSC
Consider N copies of 0d
Majorana
fermions with time-reversal symmetry (in total 2
N/2
states):
Breaks time-reversal
For N = 2, the only possible Hamiltonian is
But it breaks time-reversal symmetry, thus with time-reversal symmetry, H = 0, the state is 2-fold degenerate.
For N = 4, the only T invariant Hamiltonian isSlide11
0d boundary of 1d TSC
Finally, when N = 8,
doublet
doublet
GS fully gapped,
nondegenerate
Thus, when N = 8, the
Majorana
fermions can be gapped out by interaction without degeneracy, andSlide12
0d boundary of 1d TSC
These 0d fermions are realized at the boundary of 1d TSC:
γ
1
γ
2
Trivial
TSC
E
E
With
N
flavors, at the boundary
In the bulk:
This implies that, with interaction, 8 copies of such 1d TSC is trivial, i.e. interaction reduces the classification from
Z
to
Z
8
.
Fidkowski
,
Kitaev
, 2009
J
1
J
1
J
2
J
2Slide13
1
d
boundary of
2d
TSC
The system has time-reversal symmetry,
which forbids any quadratic mass for odd flavors, but does not forbid mass for even flavors.
Define another Z2 symmetry:
The T and Z2 together guarantee that the 1d boundary of arbitrary copies remain gapless, without interaction, i.e.
Z
classification.
Short range interactions reduce the classification of
this 2d TSC from
Z
to
Z
8
, namely its edge (8 copies of 1d
Majorana
fermions) can be gapped out by interaction, with
Qi, 2012, Yao,
Ryu
2012,
Ryu
, Zhang 2012,
Gu
, Levin 2013
1d boundary of 2d
p±ip
TSC:Slide14
1
d
boundary of
2d
TSC
Short range interactions reduce the classification of
this 2d TSC from
Z
to
Z
8
, namely its edge (8 copies of 1d
Majorana
fermions) can be gapped out by interaction, with
Qi, 2012, Yao, Ryu 2012, Ryu, Zhang 2012,
Gu
, Levin 2013
This can be shown with accurate
bosonization
calculation (
Fidkowski
,
Kitaev
2009
)
One can also demonstrate this result with an argument, which can be generalized to higher dimensions.
Consider Hamiltonian:Slide15
1
d
boundary of
2d
TSC
If
ϕ
orders/condenses, fermions are gapped, breaks T and Z2, but preserves
T’
If
ϕ
disorders, all symmetries are preserved, integrating out
ϕ
will lead to a local four fermion interaction.
The symmetries can be restored by condensing the kinks of
ϕ
(transverse field
Ising
). A fully gapped and
nondegenerate
symmetric 1d phase is only possible when kink is gapped and
nondegenerate
.
ϕ
condense/order
ϕ
disorder,
kink condensesSlide16
1
d
boundary of
2d
TSC
If
ϕ
orders/condenses, fermions are gapped, breaks T and Z2, but preserves
T’
If
ϕ
disorders, all symmetries are preserved, integrating out
ϕ
will lead to a local four fermion interaction.
A kink of
ϕ
has N flavors of 0d
Majorana
fermion modes, with
We know that with
N
= 8, interaction can gap out kink with no
deg
, so….
ϕ
condense/order
ϕ
disorder,
kink condensesSlide17
3
d TSC
Short range interactions reduce the classification of the 3d TSC from
Z
to
Z
16
, namely its edge (16 copies of 2d
Majorana
fermions) can be gapped out by interaction, with
Kitaev
(unpublished)
Fidkowski
, et.al. 2013,
Wang
,
Senthil
2014,
Metlitski
, et.al. 2014, You, Xu
, arXiv:1409.0168
2
d
boundary of 3
d
TSCSlide18
Consider an enlarged O(2) symmetry.
When
ϕ
condenses/orders, it breaks T, breaks O(2), but keeps
2
d
boundary of 3
d
TSC
Consider a modified boundary Hamiltonian (
Wang,
Senthil
2014
):
All the symmetries can be restored by condensing the vortices of the ϕ
order parameter
.
A fully gapped,
nondegenerate
, symmetric state is only possible if the vortex is gapped,
nondegenerate
.
A vortex core has one
Majorana
mode, and
With
N
= 16, interaction can gap out the 2d boundary with no deg.Slide19
3
d
boundary of
4d TSC (sketch)
The 3d boundary of a 4d TSC with U(1) x T x Z2 symmetry:
These symmetries guarantee that no quadratic mass terms are allowed at the 3d boundary. So without interaction the classification of this 4d TSC is
Z
.
We want to argue that, with interaction, the classification is reduced to
Z
8
, namely the interaction can gap out
16
flavors of 3d left chiral fermions without generating any quadratic fermion mass. Slide20
3
d
boundary of
4d TSC (sketch)
The 3d boundary of a 4d TSC with U(1) x T x Z2 symmetry:
Now consider U(1) order parameter:
The U(1) symmetry can be restored by condensing the vortex loops of the order parameter.
For N=1 copy, the vortex line is a gapless 1+1d
Majorana
fermion with T and Z2 symmetry (same as 1d boundary of 2d TSC)
Then when N=8 (
16 chiral fermions at the 3d boundary
), interaction can gap out vortex loop.Slide21
3
d
boundary of
4d TSC (sketch)
The 3d boundary of a 4d TSC with U(1) x T x Z2 symmetry:
Now consider three component order parameter:
All the symmetries can be restored by condensing the hedgehog monopole of the order parameter. For N=1 copy, the monopole is a 0d
Majorana
fermion with T symmetry
Then when N=8 (
16 chiral fermions at the 3d boundary
), interaction can gap out monopole.Slide22
3
d
boundary of
4d TSC (sketch)
Dual theory for hedgehog monopole:
Hedgehog monopole can be viewed as a domain wall of two flavors of vortex loops.
Dual theory for SF Goldstone mode:
Dual theory for
one flavor
of vortex loop:
Dual theory for
two flavors
of vortex loops plus monopole:Slide23
Question 1: what is the maximal symmetry of the interaction term?
Question
2: Is this phase transition continuous? If so, what is the field theory for this phase transition? (Numerical data suggests this is indeed a continuous phase transition. To appear)
0
+
infty
gapless
gapped
Question 3
: properties of the strongly coupled “trivial” state?
The fermion Green’s function has an analytic zero, G(
ω
) ~
ω
arXiv:1403.4938
Interacting
TSC
and Possible Origin of 16n chiral fermions in Standard Model
Further thoughts:Slide24
When and only when there are 16 chiral fermions, we can gap out the mirror sector by interaction with
Mirror sector,
gapped by interaction
Then only the 16 left fermions survive at low energy.
3d boundary,
16 chiral fermions
Interacting
TSC
and Possible Origin of 16n chiral fermions in Standard Model
Conclusion for part 1:Slide25
Gravitational Anomalies and
Bosonic
phases with
Gapless
boundary and
Trivial
bulk
Introduction for part 2:
Fermionic
TI and TSC: systems with trivial
bulk spectrum,
but gapless boundary;
2d IQH and
p+ip
TSC: does not need any symmetry;
2d QSH: U(1) and time-reversal
3
d TI: U(1) and time-reversal
3
d He3B: time-reversal
Bosonic
analogue:
2d E8 state (
Kitaev
): does not need any symmetry; chiral bosons with chiral central charge c=8 at the 1d boundary
Bosonic
“topological insulators”, or
bosonic
symmetry protected topological states:
Chen,
Gu
, Liu, Wen, 2011
.Slide26
Gravitational Anomalies and
Bosonic
phases with
Gapless
boundary and
Trivial
bulk
2d E8 state (
Kitaev
): does not need any symmetry; chiral bosons with chiral c=8 at the 1d boundary.
Effective field theory:Slide27
Gravitational Anomalies and
Bosonic
phases with
Gapless
boundary and
Trivial
bulk
2d E8 state (
Kitaev
): does not need any symmetry; chiral bosons with chiral c=8 at the 1d boundary. Chiral boson will lead to
gravitational anomaly
at the 1+1d boundary (namely general coordinate transformation is no longer a symmetry).
Goal
: Can we find higher dimensional analogues of this state?
Key: can we find higher dimensional (boundary)
bosonic
theories which are gapless without assuming any symmetry?
Or:
can we find higher dimensional (boundary)
bosonic
theories with gravitational anomalies?Slide28
Gravitational Anomalies and
Bosonic
phases with
Gapless
boundary and
Trivial
bulk
In (4k+2)d space-time (4k+1d space), the following “self-dual” rank-2k tensor boson field
Θ
has gravitational anomalies: (
Alvarez-Gauze, Witten 1983
)
When k=0 (1+1d space-time), the self-dual condition becomes:
The 4k+3d bulk field theory for this self-dual boson field is
C
is a (2k+1)-form
antisymmetric
gauge field.
Recall: 2+1d CS field has 1+1d chiral boson at its boundary.Slide29
Gravitational Anomalies and
Bosonic
phases with
Gapless
boundary and
Trivial
bulk
The
K
matrix has to satisfy the following conditions to construct the desired
bosonic
phase:
1,
Det
[K] = 1, otherwise the bulk will have topological degeneracy;
2
, local
excitations
of this system are all
bosonic
;
The same
K
for E8 state in 2d satisfies both conditions:Slide30
Gravitational Anomalies and
Bosonic
phases with
Gapless
boundary and
Trivial
bulk
Knowing this boson state in 4k+2d space (labeled as B
4k+2
state), we can construct other
bosonic
state in other dimensions.
In every 4k+3d space, there is a
bosonic
state with time-reversal symmetry, which can be viewed as proliferating T-breaking domain walls with B4k+2
sandwiched in each T domain wall. Its 4k+4d bulk space-time action is:
This state has Z2 classification, namely it is only a nontrivial BSPT with
θ
=
π
mod 2
π
(analogue of 3d TI).Slide31
Gravitational Anomalies and
Bosonic
phases with
Gapless
boundary and
Trivial
bulk
Knowing this boson state in 4k+2d space (labeled as B
4k+2
state), we can construct other
bosonic
state in other dimensions.
In every 4k+4d space, there is a
bosonic
state with U(1) symmetry, which can be viewed as proliferating U(1) vortex with B4k+2
stuffed in each vortex. After “gauging” this U(1) global symmetry, its 4k+5d bulk space-time action is:
……
This state has Z
classification. At the 4k+4d boundary, there is a mixed U(1) and gravitational anomaly. Slide32
Gravitational Anomalies and
Bosonic
phases with
Gapless
boundary and
Trivial
bulk
Further thoughts:
We used the
perturbative
gravitational anomalies to construct higher dimensional
bosonic
TI without any symmetry;
What about global gravitational anomalies?
In 8k and 8k+1d space-time, single
Majorana
fermions have global
gravitational anomalies (
Witten 1983
), namely partition function changes sign under a “large” general coordinate transformation.
Global gravitational anomaly (Z2 classified) corresponds to the Z2 classification of 1d, 8d and 9d
fermionic
TI without any symmetry.
By contrast,
perturbative
gravitational anomaly (Z classified) corresponds to the Z classification at 2d, 6d, 10d…
But is there a
bosonic
theory with global gravitational anomalies?Slide33
Conclusion for part 2:
Gravitational Anomalies and
Bosonic
phases with
Gapless
boundary and
Trivial
bulk
In every 4k+2d space, there is a
bosonic
state with trivial bulk spectrum, but gapless boundary states and boundary gravitational anomalies, without assuming any symmetry.
Descendant
bosonic
SPT states in other dimensions can be constructed.
All these states are beyond the group
cohomology
classification of
bosonic
SPT states.