/
neutrino neutrino

neutrino - PowerPoint Presentation

min-jolicoeur
min-jolicoeur . @min-jolicoeur
Follow
473 views
Uploaded On 2016-07-31

neutrino - PPT Presentation

mass Stuart Freedman memorial symposium Berkeley Jan 11 2014 Hamish Robertson University of Washington a long wait for a little weight 2 Neutrinos oscillate have mass Super Kamiokande ID: 426729

project mass tritium neutrino mass project neutrino tritium katrin ptolemy capture decay beta planck experiment source bowles tom potential accelerating prd freedman

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "neutrino" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

neutrino mass

Stuart Freedman memorial symposiumBerkeley, Jan 11, 2014

Hamish Robertson, University of Washington

a long wait for a little weightSlide2

2

Neutrinos oscillate, have mass

Super-

Kamiokande

KamLAND

SNOSlide3

Particle Physics Cosmology

What

is the

neutrino mass

scale?Slide4

Neutrino mass from Beta Spectra

neutrino masses

mixing

With flavor mixing

:

from oscillations

mass scale

4Slide5

Mass limits from tritium

5Slide6

6

Hamish

Robertson, Stuart Freedman, Tom Bowles, Carol Bowles, Karl-Erik Bergkvist.

Erice

1980.

(from Tom)Slide7

7

Tom Bowles, Carol Bowles, Stuart Freedman, Hamish Robertson, Erice

1980. (from Tom)Slide8

8

Magnetic spectrometers showed no kink. But they had shape correction factors.

"

Contrary to intuition, a null

result is not inherently more reliable than a positive one

.”

J.J. SimpsonGrabowski spectrometerSlide9

Current

status:

Mainz

: solid T

2

, MAC-E filter

C. Kraus et al., Eur. Phys. J. C40, 447 (2005)

Troitsk

:

gaseous T

2

, MAC-E filter

V.

Aseev

et al.,

PRD 84 (2011) 112003

Together:…

m

v

<

1.8

eV

(95% CL)

9Slide10

Mass and mixing parameters

m

21

2

7.54

+

0.21

-0.21

x 10

-5

eV

2



m

32

2

|

2.42

+

0.12

-0.11

x 10

-3

eV

2

m

i

>

0.055

eV

(90% CL)

<

5.4

eV

(

95%

CL)*

12

34.1

+

0.9

-0.9

deg

23

39.2

+1.8

-1.8

deg

13

9

.1

+0.6

-0.7

deg

sin

2

13

0.025

+

.

003

-

.

003

Marginalized 1-D 1-

uncertainties.

*C. Kraus et al., Eur. Phys. J. C40, 447 (2005

); V.

Aseev

et al. PRD

84

(2011) 112003

.

Other refs, see

Fogli

et al. 1205.5254

10

Oscillation

KinematicSlide11

TLK

KATRIN

At

Karlsruhe Institute

of

Technology

unique

facility

for

closed

T

2

cycle

:

Tritium Laboratory Karlsruhe

11

A

direct, model-independent

, kinematic method, based on

β

decay of tritium.

~ 75 m

long

with

40

s.c

.

solenoidsSlide12

12

~0.4

eV

First measurement, U

IE

= 700V, electron gun source.

July 12, 2013.Slide13

13

Measuring something and getting it wrong?Slide14

A window to work in

Molecular

excitations

14

Energy lossSlide15

KATRIN

’s uncertainty budget

Statistical

Final-state spectrum

T

-

ions in T

2

gas

Unfolding energy loss

Column density

Background slope

HV variation

Potential variation in sourceB-field variation in sourceElastic scattering in T2 gas

σ

(m

v

2

)

0

0.01 eV

2

σ

(m

v

2

)

total

= 0.025 eV

2

15

m

v

<

0.2

eV

(90 % CL)Slide16

What is the branching ratio for T

2 → 3He

T+?

Source

Experiment

Theory

Snell

Wexler

TH

0.932

± 0.019

0.895

± 0.011

---

T

2

---

0.945 ± 0.006

0.36

Need a test of the final-state theory for KATRIN and Project 8

Tritium Recoil-Ion Mass Spectrometer (

TRIMS

)Slide17

Mass Range Accessible

Present

Lab Limit

1

.8

eV

starting

2016

KATRINSlide18

18

K.

Abazajian, CF5 SummarySlide19

e

μ

τ

c

s

u

d

t

b

ν

h

ν

m

ν

l

meV

eV

keV

MeV

GeV

TeV

LEPTONS

QUARKS

??Slide20

Mass Range Accessible

Present

Lab Limit

1

.8

eV

starting

2016

KATRINSlide21

The Last Order of Magnitude

If the mass is

below 0.2

eV

, how

can we measure it?

KATRIN may be the largest such experiment possible.

Size of experiment now:

Diameter 10 m.

Rovibrational

states of

THe

+

,

HHe

+

molecule

Source T

2

column density near max

Next diameter: 300 m!

σ

(m

v

)

2

~ 0.38 eV

2Slide22

(B.

Monreal and J. Formaggio, PRD 80:051301, 2009)

Radiated power ~ 1

fW

Cyclotron radiation from tritium beta decay

Working on the UW prototype

25.5-GHz waveguide cellSlide23

Signal is a rising “chirp” in frequencySlide24

Project 8: a phased approachSlide25

Project 8 sensitivity

25Slide26

Neutrino Mass Limits from Beta decaySlide27

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

Analysis 2

Planck:

Construction

Running

KATRIN:

Phase I

Proof concept

Prototype

Project 8:

Neutrino mass: some milestones

27Slide28

28

Stuart Freedman, Steve Elliott, Hamish Robertson. Spanish coast 1992. Photo by John Wilkerson.Slide29

29Slide30

Capture of relic Neutrinos

PTOLEMY project

30Slide31

Capture of relic Neutrinos

PTOLEMY project

31Slide32

PTOLEMY Experimental Layout

32

Tritium Source Disk

(Surface Deposition)

High Field Solenoid

Long High Uniformity

Solenoid (~2T)

Accelerating

Potential

MAC-E filter

(De-accelerating

Potential)

Accelerating

Potential

RF Tracking

(38-46 GHz)

Time-of-Flight

(De-accelerating

Potential)

Cryogenic

Calorimeter

(~0.1eV)

Low Field

Region

e

-

E

0

-18.4keV

0-1keV

(~150eV)

E

0

E

0

+30kV

~50-150eV

below

EndpointSlide33

PTOlemy

summary100 g of tritium (1 MCi) on 12-m diameter disk.

Relic capture rate ~ 10/year without local clustering.Also presumably able to measure mass, active and sterile.Transition-edge sensor array to provide basic 0.1-eV resolution.Tagging with RF cyclotron radiation a la Project 8.

Necessary to understand quantum effects of binding of T

2

on surface.

33Slide34

Inputs

Present laboratory limit 1.8 eV (90% CL) from Mainz and

Troitsk experiments on tritiumKATRIN experiment under construction.

Project 8

in proof-of-concept phase.

Cosmological

inputs driven by Planck, SPT, ACT

, Sloan …34Slide35

Planck XVI

WP = WMAP Polarization data

A

L

= weak lensing parameter

τ

= optical depth at recombination

“…

Planck lensing likelihood

favours

larger

Σm than the temperature power spectrum.”

First Planck analysis (March 2013)Slide36

(B.

Monreal and J. Formaggio

, PRD 80:051301, 2009)

Cyclotron radiation from tritium beta decay

25.5-GHz waveguide cellSlide37

Neutrinoless

Double Beta Decay

1 sigma

W.

Rodejohann

, 1206.2560

Depends on m

v

but not a `direct’ measurementSlide38

Electron Capture Holmium

Expt (ECHO)

38

187

J.F. WilkersonSlide39

39

J.F. Wilkerson

187

Electron Capture Holmium Expt (ECHO)Slide40

Neutrino mass Physics Impact

40Slide41

summary

Direct mass measurements are largely model independent: Majorana or DiracNo nuclear matrix elementsNo complex phasesNo cosmological degrees of freedom

One experiment in construction (KATRIN); 2015 start.Three experiments in R&D (Project 8, ECHo, PTOLEMY)

41