PPT-Patent Law Update MELISSA ASFAHANI

Patent Attorney El Paso TX masfahaniolpatentlawcom Disclaimer The following presentation is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice for your particular legal needs. Assignments and Other Information that only Attorneys find Useful and Interesting. Justin R. . Nifong. Disclaimer. These materials are public information and have been prepared for entertainment purposes only to contribute to the fascinating study of intellectual property law. No rights, warranties, or other guarantees are provided herein. Everyone else’s disclaimers are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. . Dimitrios T. Drivas. April 8, 2015. Fordham IP . Institute: 2C. . U.S. Patent Law. U.S. . Supreme Court. 35 U.S.C. § 285, Exceptional Case Standard for Award – . Octane Fitness v. ICON . Octane Fitness LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, . Dimitrios T. Drivas. April 24, 2014. Fordham IP Institute: 2C. U.S. Patent Law. U.S. SUPREME COURT. 2. Declaratory Judgment Burden of Proof . – . Medtronic v. . Mirowski. Medtronic, Inc. v. . Mirowski. June 2013. Table of Contents. 1. Case . Law . ..................................................................................................................... § 101 . Eligibility . ......................................................................................................... Professor Damien Geradin. Tilburg University / UCL London. EDGE Legal. University of Melbourne, 10 March 2016. What are patent assertion entities?. Patent assertion entities (“PAEs”) are firms acquiring patent portfolios, which they monetize through licensing agreements with manufacturers.. Justin R. . Nifong. Disclaimer. These materials are public information and have been prepared for entertainment purposes only to contribute to the fascinating study of intellectual property law. No rights, warranties, or other guarantees are provided herein. Everyone else’s disclaimers are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. . Effect of patent protection. Substantive requirements for patent protection. Procedural requirements for patent protection. Form and interpretation of patents. Right to Exclude. Patent is a right to exclude. (. M. officinalis. ). RESEARCH. Scholey. A, Gibbs A, Neale C, et al. Anti-Stress Effects of Lemon Balm-Containing Foods. Nutrients. 2014;6(11):4805-4821. doi:10.3390/nu6114805.. Akbarzadeh. M, . Dehghani. Patented. David . Kappos. Robert Armitage. Bruce Sunstein. Denise Kettelberger,. moderator. September 9, 2016. 2. Topics. How . it started: . Prometheus, Myriad, . Alice. Sequenom. v. . Ariosa. : the Court . John . Kirkpatrick. Patent . Pro Bono Program Coordinator. December 3, 2015. 2. Patent Pro Bono Program. Assists financially under-resourced independent inventors and small businesses.. Section 32 . of the AIA calls . February . 16, . 2016. IEEE-IAS . Atlanta Chapter. Jason M. . Perilla. Patents protect the exclusive rights of inventors to their respective inventions for a limited time. Encourages innovation via reward of limited monopoly. Silicon Valley Computer History Museum. December 14-15, 2017. The Patent Secondary Market:. A Closer Look at Patents as an Asset Class. . Asset Class Comparison. Uniqueness. Value Subjectivity. Patent Attorney . . El Paso, TX. masfahani@olpatentlaw.com. Disclaimer. The following presentation is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice for your particular legal needs.. Annual Meeting. Drew Hirshfeld. . Commissioner for Patents, USPTO. . December 7, . 2017. Patents Workforce . (as of Oct. . 2017. ). 9,970 total employees. 8,152 total Patent Examiners. Of which 186 are Design Examiners.