PPT-Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring

Title III Part A Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability 2018 Coordinators Technical Assistance Academy Roanoke July 911 2018 Williamsburg July 2325 2018. NABat. ). . Core Team & Supporters. Susan Loeb, USFS-SRS. Jeremy Coleman, USFWS. Laura Ellison, USGS. Tom Rodhouse, NPS. Tom Ingersoll, . DoD. Cori . Lausen. , WCS Canada. Wayne Thogmartin, USGS. ESEA/Act 807. ACSIP. Arkansas Department of Education. Division of Public School Accountability. Federal & State . Monitoring Unit. John Hoy, Assistant Commissioner. Willie Morris, Director. Wes Whitley, Coordinator. Steve Birkhofer. A-133 . and Sub-Recipient Monitoring. Colleges & Universities benefited greatly from the more than $500 . bil. in grants awarded in FY 2012 to various non-federal entities. The Single Audit Act of 1984 (amended in 1996, revised 2003 & 2007) and OMB A-133 provide audit guidelines applicable to colleges and universities to ensure that these funds are expended properly.. Russ Sweet. Preparing for ESEA Program Reviews of . Titles I-A, II-A, VI-B (REAP), and X. Summer 2014. Welcome!. ODE’s . objective . in . the program review. Learn about program recordkeeping. Collaborate with other program coordinators. Sheena Tran, Rancho Santiago CCD. Tania Walden, Los Rios CCD. Tracy Young, Coast CCD. May 2013. Agenda. Defining Subrecipients. Regulatory Requirements. Monitoring. Importance of . Relationships. Proposed Grant Reform. 2018-2019. Office . of Program Administration and . Accountability. . 2018 . Coordinators’ Technical Assistance . Academy. Roanoke: July . 9-11, 2018. Williamsburg: July . 23-25, 2018. Disclaimer. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service . Office of Subsistence Management. Federal Subsistence Board. January 12-13, 2016 Work Session. Program. . Overview. Historical Overview. Programmatic Review. Revised Process. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service . Office of Subsistence Management. Federal Subsistence Board. January 12-13, 2016 Work Session. Program. . Overview. Historical Overview. Programmatic Review. Revised Process. Kerber, Eck & Braeckel. . LLP. What is a SEFA?. Why is the SEFA Important?. Accumulating the Data. Testing the Data . Sorting & Summarizing the Data. SEFA Note Disclosure. Common Deficiencies. A Unique Job Placement Tool. A business insurance policy that protects the employer in case of any loss of money or property due to employee dishonesty. What is the Federal Bonding Program?. What makes this program great?. 2019–20 Federal Program Monitoring English Learner Instrument Training July 31– August 1, 2019, Los Angeles August 7–8, 2019, Sacramento Presentation Objectives Demystify the English Learner (EL) Instrument and the Federal Program Monitoring (FPM) process David Senn, Emily . Novick. , . Anthony . Malkassian. February 4, 2014. Background. /assumptions. Monitoring Program . Development: proposed . approach. 3 year plan. Year 1. Feedback. Discussion Topics/Questions. English Learner Instrument Remote Training. August 2021. Federal Program Monitoring and COVID-19. As of July 1, 2021, most of the COVID-19 related regulations and exemptions have expired. During the Federal Program Monitoring (FPM) review process, documents from both the current year and previous year are reviewed. We understand the challenges presented during COVID-19 and have included resources related to COVID-19 at the end of this presentation.. Monitoring. 1. Not. . auditors. .. Purpose. :. . to . assist. . the. Subrecipient. Federal regulations . . .. Require GOHSEP to monitor . grant-supported activities. . to:. Ensure Subrecipients are in .