Put It On My Tab a n emerging technology proposal - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

Put It On My Tab

an emerging technology proposalScriptStart the presentationReflectionReferencesOnline PresentationView narrated presentation online without Reflection or ReferencesSlide2
Slide3

Web 2.0

MobilityIntuitiveOperating TimeSmaller sizeSoftware & AppsTablet Cart1:1 Model

Not emergent

Not Reliable

Laptop CartSlide4

Emerging Instructional Strategies

Authentic learning experiencesCollaborationDifferentiationStudent-directed learning

©

2013 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved

.Slide5

Aaryn

Schmuhl: “Our system views technology as tools that give students the power to create demonstrations of mastery. Technology today is not about a device, or software package, or even a particular project.  Technology is about connecting and creating and demonstrating mastery.”

S

chmuhl

,

A. (

2013).

Email interview.Slide6

Instructional Technology Services Department:

“Instructional Technology supports the uses of technology as a means to … accelerate the documented benefits of research-based instructional strategies.”

Blanton (2013)Slide7

Yelland

: “when such technologies are embedded in the curriculum, young children can not only experience concepts that were previously well beyond that expected of them, but they can deploy sophisticated strategies and work collaboratively with others in new and dynamic ways.”

Y

elland

(2005

)Slide8

All grades, ages 5 – 12

Software & appsManagement cartSlide9

Management cart

30 10-inch tablets5 VGA adapters1 wireless network router30 wireless keyboardsCCGPS ELA Standard 6 for Grades 3-5

Keyboarding

Skills

GaDOE

(2011)

©

2013 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved

.

©

2013 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved

.Slide10

Technical

SupportApplication SpecialistInitial configurationOngoing maintenanceInstructional Technology Specialist

Training

Developing Strategies

Media Specialist

First ResponderSlide11

Current

LimitationsNo wireless accessSPLOSTConservative policiesProfilesDigital Citizenship InitiativeSlide12

Projected

CostsNo training costs$25, 179.75 18, 732.90 Tablets 3,710.40 Keyboards 1,927.16 Cart 549.99 Wireless Router 259.30 VGA AdaptersSlide13

Sources of

FundingTitle 1 FundsPTOPartners-In-EducationGaDoE and/or Local Content Area GrantsGrants from Professional Organizations AASL GLMA

GaEdTech

Consortium Slide14

Other Online Sources of

FundingDigitalWish.comEmergingEdTech.comInstructional Technology CouncileSchoolNews.comMimeo.comUS DoE Technology Grants Slide15

Tablets &

StandardsCommon Core Georgia Performance StandardsProgressive Skill StrandsSlide16

Tablets &

StandardsLanguage Arts, Standard 6K, 1st, 2nd …digital tools publish…collaboration3rd

…keyboard skills

4

th

& 5

th

…proficiency

GaDOE

(2011)

Slide17

Tablets &

StandardsLanguage Arts, Standard 83rd …information … digital sources 4th …categorize…

list sources

5

th

…summarize/

paraphrase

GaDOE

(2011)Slide18

Differentation

ResourcesResponseAssessmentSlide19

Collaboration

GoogleDocsePalsBlogsSlide20

Research- Based Strategy

Instructional technology integration1834 titlesInstructional technology effectiveness607 titlesPositive Slide21

Touch

Tablet SurprisesCooperationCollaborationDigital CitizenshipConnection to the real worldShifflet, Toledo, & Mattoon (2012) Slide22

Research- Based Strategy

“…be creative, solve problems, think and make decisions.” NAEYC and the Fred Rogers Center (2012)“…literacies of 21st-century technologies.” International Reading Association (2009) Slide23

Effective Research-Based Practices

“variety of platformsplayful experimentationassistive technology deviceslanguage-translation softwaregeometry software…

NAEYC (2012)

Slide24

Effective Research-Based Practices

interactive gamesdigital tools for investigationediting softwareconnect with other children…globallydocument their progress (digitally)”

NAEYC (2012)

Slide25

Implementation Plan

Identify desired apps Survey teachers Collaborate on lesson plans Catalog the equipment Configure the tablets Slide26

Implementation Plan

Standard Operating ProcedureCheck-out proceduresSet-upTablet R & RReturn/check-in procedures Slide27

Implementation Plan

Conduct initial lessons Feedback/Revision Classroom lesson Recruit next group Repeat the process Slide28

Change Mediation

“One of the most common and serious mistakes… is to presume that once an innovation has been introduced and an initial training has been completed, the intended users will put the innovation into practice. A second serious mistake is to assume that all users of the implementation will react in similar ways.”  Hord, et al. (1987) Slide29

Change Mediation

D-n-CMCDivideMotivateCollaborateConquerSlide30

Summary

Emerging instructional technologiesInteractive and collaborativeKnowledge is fluidCommunities of co-learnersKnowledge creatorsSlide31

Summary

Put It On My TabSlide32

Return to the start slide

Continue to the:ReflectionReferencesSlide33

Reflection

Selecting and Evaluating Emerging Technologies The first thing I learned is that there is a constantly growing world of emerging instructional technologies and strategies to be explored. (It was difficult to choose which to explore.) This proliferation is due to the interactive and collaborative nature of today’s digital communication platforms. I am also starting to see how important it is to teach students with a similar model. Knowledge is fluid, changing by the moment, defined now by authentic, global, robust communities of co-learners, rather than by a limited group of ivory tower, theoretical thinkers. We have to instill a confidence in our students that they can work individually, or with others, to be knowledge creators rather than simply knowledge receivers. These digital tablets, along with all of the other devices that are finding their way into the learning process, are truly making content, knowledge, expression, and assessment accessible to all learners.Slide34

Reflection

Professional PracticeThough I initially rolled my eyes at the requirement to address change mitigation, as I read through the materials about CBAM and a couple of other strategies, I was glad that requirement was included. I have long been of the mindset, “Just suck it up and do what is required,” and I have had little patience for people who did not take that approach. I had not taken the time to learn why people are resistant, but more importantly, how there are differences in the way people react to change. I realize now, if you take individual doubts and concerns into consideration, address those issues with reassurance, then help to establish an internal motivation, and a confidence that assistance will ensue; you can reduce that resistance to change. I think I am a kinder and gentler agent of change, as a result of this study. StartSlide35

Return to the start slide

Continue to:ReferencesSlide36

References/Sources

Blanton, B. (2013). Instructional technology. Henry County Schools. Retrieved from: http://schoolwires.henry.k12.ga.us/Page/424GaDOE (2011). K-12 ELA CCGPS Educator Resource. Atlanta: Georgia Department of Education. Retrieved from: https://www.georgiastandards.org/Common-Core/Documents/ CCGPS_ELA_K-12_EducatorResourceDocument.pdfHord, S. M.; Rutherford, W. L.; Huling-Austin, L.; Gene E. Hall, G. E. (1987). Taking charge of change. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.International Reading Association (2009). New literacies and 21st-century technologies: A position statement of the International Reading Association. Newark, DE: Author. Retrieved

from:

http

://www.reading.org/Libraries/position-statements-and-resolutions/ps1067_NewLiteracies21stCentury.pdf

NAEYC (2012). Effective classroom practice: School-age children.

Technology and young children

.

Washington

, DC: NAEYC Retrieved from:

http://

www.naeyc.org/content/technology-and-young-children/school-age-

children

NAEYC & Fred Rogers Center for Early Learning and Children’s Media (2012).

Technology and

Interactive

Media as Tools in

Early

Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through Age 8

. Joint position statement. Washington, DC:

NAEYC

; Latrobe, PA: Fred Rogers Center at Saint Vincent College. Retrieved

from:

http

://www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/positions/PS_technology_WEB2.pdf

Shifflet

, R.; Toledo, C.; Mattoon, C. (2012). Touch tablet surprises: A preschool teacher’s story.

Young

Children.

Washington,

DC

: NAEYC. Retrieved from

:

http

://www.naeyc.org/yc/files/yc/Touch%20Tablet%20Suprises.pdf

Yelland

, N. 2005. The Future Is Now: A Review of the Literature on the Use of Computers in Early

Childhood

Education (1994

–

2004

).

AACE Journal 13

(3): 201–32. Slide37

Online Sources Referred to but not

quotedAASL http://www.ala.org/aasl/awards/beyond-wordsDigital Wish http://www.digitalwish.com/dw/digitalwish/grantsEmergingEdTech http://www.emergingedtech.com/2012/02/7-online-resources-for-finding-grants-for-educators/ ePals http://www.epals.comeSchoolNews http://www.eschoolnews.com/funding/Georgia Library Media Association http://www.glma-inc.org/grants-and-awards/GAEdTech Consortium http://www.gaetc.org/domain/82GoogleDocs http://docs.google.comInstructional Technology Council http://www.itcnetwork.org/resources/grant-opportunities.html

Mimeo

http://news.mimio.com/free-educational-funding-guides?jadid=17014316076&jk=education%20technology%20grant&jkId=gc:a8a8ae4cd3b61d7f5013b6c11a6165f96:t1_b_:k_education%20technology%20grant:pl_&jp=&js=1&jsid=25957&jt=1&gclid=CJyup4OwqrgCFUlp7AodBnwAtw

US DoE

http://www.ed.gov/edblogs/technology/grants/

Image Permissions

Microsoft

Visuals

©

2013 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

http

://www.microsoftstore.com/store/msusa/en_US/DisplayTermsOfUseAndSalePage/ThemeID.33363200

/