PPT-Annual Program Evaluation

SWOT Analysis Preparation for the Self Study Njoku Faddoul Gulati GMEC April 23 2015 Recent UMMC Experiences related to the APE Ortho Focused SV SV specifically required meeting with the PEC . Arianna . Legovini. Head, Development Impact Evaluation Initiative (DIME). World Bank. FIRST What is a results chain?. 2. Example of a results chain. 3. ?. The results chain. Developmental hypothesis that helps you define:. Michael T. Flannery, M.D., F.A.C.P.. Professor of Medicine. GME Internal Review Director. ACGME EVALUATION REQUIREMENTS. RESIDENT EVALUATION. FORMATIVE. . EVALUATION. Faculty must evaluate resident performance during each rotation and document this evaluation at completion of the assignment.. “Top Roadblocks on the Path to Good Evaluation– And How to Avoid Them” . Presented by: Tom Chapel. Top Roadblocks on the Path to Good Evaluation– . And How to Avoid Them . Thomas J. Chapel, MA, MBA. , Ph. D.. Head. School Standards and Evaluation Unit. National University of Educational Planning and Administration (NUEPA). 17-B ,Sri Aurobindo Marg, New Delhi-110016, INDIA. Phone: 011-26544815. Evaluation For Improvement . Evaluator Training 2016-17 SY. Classified . Employees Evaluation . Process . Classified employees are evaluated in . 3. . Performance . Categories. :. each category contains . Performance Descriptors . and Logic Models. ScWk. 242 – Session 10 Slides. Review – Program Evaluation. Seeks to answer the overall question of whether a program (or policy, initiative, project, etc…) is effective or not.. Uijtdehaage. bas@mednet.ucla.edu. 310.794.9009. Why do you evaluate?. Five reasons of evaluating. FORMATIVE. informs program development. SUMMATIVE. demonstrate program’s success and impact. UNDERSTANDING. “Getting Started and . Engaging Your Stakeholders”. Presented by: Leslie . Fierro. and . Carlyn. . Orians. . Getting Started and Engaging Your Stakeholders. Leslie A. . Fierro. , MPH. TKCIS Contractor NCEH/CDC. Program Evaluation Webinar Series Part 1: “Top Roadblocks on the Path to Good Evaluation– And How to Avoid Them” Presented by: Tom Chapel Top Roadblocks on the Path to Good Evaluation– And How to Avoid Them Bob Michael. Associate Vice Chancellor, University System of Georgia. Carla Tanguay. Associate to the Dean for Clinical Practice, Georgia State University. Tatiana Rivadeneyra. Director of Accreditation, Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. Revised 2015 Evaluator: Name:Position:Date: PLANNING AND PREPARATION Component 1a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy1a.1Knowledge of content and the structure of the discipline1a.2Knowle State:MEZip + 4:04104-9300E-Mail:jeannine.uzzi@maine.eduPhone Number:[1] 207-780-4485Fax Number:If there will be a change in your institution's Chief Academic Officer (CAO) and the incoming CAO's cont Session I: Learning about Logic Models. Hosted by the [insert alliance here]. Moderator:. Presenter:. Date. Time. 1. Introductions. Workshop facilitator:. Participants:. Name and affiliation. 2. Agenda. SPPC-II. Toolkit. JHU & AHRQ for . AIM. AHRQ Pub. No. 23-0046. July 2023. Overview. Background information for the SPPC-II/Demonstration Project. Key program evaluation concepts. SPPC-II/Demonstration Project evaluation approach.