of Shared W aters in the Americas Alfonso Rivera Chief Hydrogeologist Geological Survey of Canada 46 th IAH 2019 World Congress Malaga Spain September 2227 2019 To solve one of the grand challenges facing society today energy water climate and food natural ID: 775791
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document " Conflicts and Resolutions " is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Conflicts and Resolutions of Shared Waters in the AmericasAlfonso RiveraChief HydrogeologistGeological Survey of Canada
46th IAH 2019 World CongressMalaga, Spain, September 22-27, 2019
Slide2To solve one of the grand challenges facing society today: energy, water, climate and food, natural scientists and social scientists must work together. For the water crisis, conflicts, challenges, or water security, a new framework is required for bringing together hydrology and social sciences.
Conflicts and resolutions of shared
waters
Slide3Hypotheses:Water problems and water conflicts may have solutions but no resolutions.Peoples and cultures may stand or fall, not on the absolute amount of water, but on how equitably—politically, economically and socially—the system divides that resource.Hydrology alone cannot solve water problems or resolve conflicts; social sciences need to be combined with hydrology.
Conflicts and resolutions of shared
waters
Slide4Conflicts on shared waters may arise on any of the following :RiversLakes WetlandsAquifersOr a combination of these.
Conflicts and resolutions of shared
waters
Slide5Examples from real, or apparent situations of conflicts of shared water in the Americas
CGSM in
Colombia
Brazil-Argentina-Paraguay-Uruguay
Mexico-U.S.
Costa Rica-Nicaragua
Bolivia-Chile
Slide6Bolivia-Chile: every litre counts
Bolivia
Chile
Dispute: 200
lps
Chile says:
The
Silala
is surface water belonging to the Loa and Pacific basins
Bolivia says: The Silala is groundwater, emerging in Bolivia
Slide7Bolivia-Chile: every litre counts
Bolivia
Chile
Slide8Bolivia-Chile: every litre counts
President Evo Morales of Bolivia at the GW source, 4500 m asl
Slide9Bolivia-Chile: every litre counts
2016, Chile filed a complaint against Bolivia in the ICJ, claiming that the
Silala
is an international river and asserts its right to equitable and reasonable utilization (UN’s Watercourses Convention).
Bolivia claims ownerships of the water and demands payment from Chile for their use.
The applicability of Int. Water Law principles to the
Silala
will
depend on how
the
Silala
watershed is described
and categorized.
Expertise showed that the
Silala
springs are naturally occurring, but little is known about the extent, volume and flow, of an interrelated transboundary aquifer traversing the Bolivian-Chile border.
Slide10Brazil-Argentina-Paraguay-Uruguay: An unreachable governance system for the Guarani?
Slide11Brazil-Argentina-Paraguay-Uruguay: An unreachable governance system for the Guarani?
A first
period (2002–2010)
of positive
science collaboration of the
four
countries,
culminated with the adoption
of the
GAA in August 2010.
A
second period (2010–2017)
was marked
by a slowdown in
transboundary
cooperation. During this
period, Argentina and Uruguay,
and later Brazil, ratified
the GAA.
A
third phase
emerged in 2018 when Paraguay ratified
the GAA allowing it to enter into force.
Future
implementation of the
GAA countries
should build on the
good practices
,
stemming
from the first period of
transboundary cooperation (
science
).
Slide12Brazil-Argentina-Paraguay-Uruguay: An unreachable governance system for the Guarani?
No water conflicts, but issues of water
security
and
sovereignty
GAA designed to ensure multiple, rational, sustainable and equitable uses by the four countries sharing the TBA.
Concerns
about safeguarding
sovereignty
and national
interests
initially discouraged
governments
to this agreement
.
A breakthrough in the implementation
on
the
UN Law
of Transboundary
Aquifers
.
Slide13Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Colombia: same country, multiple stakes
Colombia
Alluvial Plain and Magdalena River on a Landsat image from 1987
5
km
Slide14Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Colombia
Multiple users / multiple stakes: Fishermen, Cattle ranchers, Banana plantations, Coal mines, Towns…
Excessive wastes into the lagoon create anoxic conditions
Slide15Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Colombia: same country, multiple stakes
Slide16Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Colombia: same country, multiple stakes
Integrated conceptual model of the SW/GW dynamics, and a detailed water balance.
Government and stakeholders agreed and compromise in managing SW/GW for all.
Slide17Costa Rica-Nicaragua: is Google’s fault?
Costa Rica
Nicaragua
Central America
Conflict zone
Slide18Conflict zone
Costa Rica-Nicaragua:
is Google’s fault?
1 km
Slide19Costa Rica-Nicaragua:
is Google’s fault?
1 km
Slide20Costa Rica v. NicaraguaBased on a Google map, in 2010 Nicaragua claimed that the delta of Rio San Juan should form the new international border with Costa Rica. Nicaragua began dredging a canal to force the river go through the area called Isla Portillos, marking the international boundary.Google recognized its “minimum error” and corrected the satellite-based map.Isla Portillos is a wetland listed in the RAMSAR convention fed by groundwater.In 2011, Costa Rica filed a complaint against Nicaragua in the International Court of Justice. The Court of Justice provided provisional measurements to assess the damages caused by the artificial canals.In 2017 the Court of Justice ruled that Costa Rica had sovereignty over the whole northern part of Isla Portillo, the wetland.
Costa Rica-Nicaragua:
is Google’s fault?
Slide21Mexico-USA: so close and yet so far…
3 150 km of waters between Mexico and the USA: Two Rivers
Colorado River
Rio Grande
Slide22Mexico-USA:
so close and yet so far…
3 150 km of waters between Mexico and the USA: 11 transboundary aquifers, or are there 35?
UNITED STATES
MEXICO
(Sanchez et al., 2016)
Slide23Mexico-USA: so close and yet so far…
Water security issues
San Diego
Tijuana
Juarez
El Paso
Slide24Intensive use of GW on both sides of the international border.Unsustainable water use practices.Increasing water conflicts.No international treaties or agreements concerning groundwater resources.Different water-management and governance approaches.
Mexico-USA:
so close and yet so far…
Slide25Mexico-USA: so close and yet so far…
Asymmetries prevent full assessment, harmonization and shared management
.
S
cientific cooperation and social participation have succeeded in a few cases (Arizona/Sonora).
Mexico-US transboundary aquifers identified in the US do not correspond to those identified in Mexico.
Despite asymmetries, the US and Mexico have a long history of cooperation on water.
Slide26Water Conflict
Bolivia-Chile
Groundwater
–
Solution– No resolution
Science
SocietyPolicy Int. Law enforcement
C. Rica-Nicaragua
River-GW-wetland
Water Conflict
–
No solution– No resolution– No cooperation
International law enforcement
Guarani
Trans aquifer
Water Security
–
Solution
–
Resolution
Science
Political will
Implementation
CGSM, Colombia
Wetland
Water Crisis
–
Solution
– No resolution
Science
Cooperation
Mexico-US
Aquifers
Water Challenges
–
Partial solutions
– No resolution
Asymmetries
Trust
Summary
Slide27Conflicts arise with regard to access, allocation, development and management of water resources.There is trust in scientific cooperation, less trust in political cooperation.If involved from the beginning, society can play a very important role in resolutions.A new framework is required for bringing together natural sciences (hydrology) and social sciences.It should include include scientific, socioeconomic and political perspectives into an interdisciplinary socio-hydrology frame for resolving water disputes or disagreements.A collaborative framework embracing the best science to facilitate optimum resolutions.
Lessons learned
Slide28Final world
Water disputes can be addressed through a combined scheme of knowledge (science), social participation and policies (agreements). Water conflicts that go unresolved become more dangerous as water becomes more scarce and global population increases.
Presentation based on the upcoming book:
Conflicts and resolutions of shared waters in the Americas
(Rivera, 2020)