Burtch 2014 delta Corsi How have we traditionally assessed players Traditional Points PlusMinus Faceoffs Real Time Stats hits blocked shots takeawaysgiveaways Ice Time How has that changed in the Behind the Net Era 2007 Present ID: 639476
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Controlling for Context S." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Controlling for ContextS. Burtch © 2014
delta
CorsiSlide2
How have we traditionally assessed players?
Traditional Points
Plus/Minus
Faceoffs
Real Time Stats (hits, blocked shots, takeaways/giveaways)
Ice TimeSlide3
How has that changed in the Behind the Net Era? (2007 – Present)
Rate Statistics
Possession Metrics (On-Ice)
Shots For / Against
Shot Attempts For / Against(aka
Corsi
)
Unblocked Shot Attempts For / Against (aka Fenwick)
Shot Attempt Differentials
Shot Attempt PercentagesSlide4
Realizations over Time
Not all minutes/situations are created equal – we are aware of Contextual impacts resulting from usage.
We’re working within a dynamic system – teasing out impacts of individuals will never be a simplistic process.Slide5
Contextual Factors We Can Account For and Examine
Zone Starts
Time on Ice
Quality of Teammates
Quality of Competition (more on this later)
Face Off Wins/Losses
Aging
Score Effects
Time Effects (in game)
Shot Type / LocationSlide6
How Have We Examined These Things?
Eyeballing all the various components
REL Measures (On Ice - Off Ice differential) - Desjardins
WOWY Charts – Tango (via Johnson)
U
sage Charts –
Vollman
Aging Trajectories / DELTA – Tango
Heavy Lifter Index -
Poplichak
Score Adjusted Metrics –
Tulsky
Zone Start Adjusted Metrics –
Tulsky
Hextally
– Thomas / VenturaSlide7
Efforts to Reify Metrics Into Single Values For Comparison Between Players
THoR
–
Schuckers
Expected Goals –
Parkatti
/
Pfeffer
Delta SOT –
Awad
Goals Above Baseline – Thomas / Ventura
delta
Corsi
–
BurtchSlide8
SDI to delta Corsi – organic development
Need to assess defenders better
Defenders don’t seem to have a massive amount of impact on SV% or SH%
Defenders DO seem to
repeatably
impact on Shot Attempt Differentials
Initially patterned after HLI (
Poplichak
) – but specific to D men
Unhappy with index values / basis for comparison / weighting
Shifted to a regression model to predict outcomes
Multivariate Linear Regression Model to predict Expected
CorsiSlide9
Results of Regression
Corsi
For and
Corsi
Against are very weakly correlated – Offense does NOT equate to Defense at the team or individual skater level.
This means we should regress CF and CA separately
Position is Relevant (F and D impact CF/CA differently)
QoT
effects are very significant
QoC
effects are marginal to nonexistent
This aligns with the work done by
Tulsky
and Johnson
TOI is a significant correlate to results (better players tend to play more)
Zone Starts are significant
Faceoffs
matter – but less than people thinkSlide10
Results of Regression
Yearly Team Effects are very significant
This is likely an indication of team quality / systems / coaching
Age effects are hard to detect but appear to be present
CONTEXT MATTERS VERY MUCH – It Explains Over 64% of observed results for
Corsi
.Slide11
Expected vs. Observed Corsi Results from 2007 – 2014 (original Regression)Slide12
dCorsi – What Is It?
dCorsi
represents the residual (differential) between a player’s Observed
Corsi
and their Expected
Corsi
resulting from the discussed regression
.
This is an improvement on
Corsi
REL because it is determined directly from contextual factors while the player is ON the ice (the OFF Ice results aren’t weighted equivalently to the other factors).Slide13
dCorsi – Is It Meaningful or Reliable?
1 SD of
dCorsi
for NHL skaters is ± 2.0404, population mean µ = 0.019
dCorsi
is repeatable at a higher level than individual skater SH% or goaltender SV%.
Year to Year 5v5 SV% for goalies with 500+
mins
has an autocorrelation coefficient of r = 0.0646, which translates to an r
2
of 0.004171 – the prior year explains 0.4% of the following year’s result.
The r
2
year over year for Expected
Corsi
exceeds 43%, and for
dCorsi
is approximately 15%.
dCorsi
accounts for yearly team effects so players are not impacted negatively/positively by transitioning from one team to another year to year.
Impacts of Coaching Effects Can Plausibly Be Observed Year to Year.Slide14
dCorsi – Where Can We Get It?
Tableau Visualizations have been created for tracking individual skaters and to make team comparisons.
http://public.tableausoftware.com/shared/5MKNXWTX4?:display_count=yes
http://public.tableausoftware.com/shared/G6HYCG29P?:display_count=yes
THANKS!