PDF-INGand Usability

Con. Lecture /slide deck produced by Saul Greenberg, University of Calgary, Canada. . Notice: some material in this deck is used from other sources without permission. Credit to the original source is given if it is known,. CMPT 281. Outline. Usability review. Observational methods. Interview methods. Questionnaire methods. Usability. ISO 9241-11:. The extent to which a product can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction, in a specified context of use. Lisa Gregory, Amy Rudersdorf. Digital Information Management Program. State Library of North Carolina. October 2, 2010. Who We Are. State Library of North Carolina. Government publications. North . Caroliniana. Alexei Oulanov, PhD, MBA, MSLIS. Medgar. Evers College/ City University of New York (USA). aoulanov@mec.cuny.edu. Abstract. The focus of the present research is on the Affect component of the Usability evaluation of the . dean calcagni, MD. observations. intended to provide a perspective and to stimulate conversation. . standards. . where we have been. . proprietary. . standards. open . systems . architecture . Qaiser S. Durrani. FAST-NU, Lahore. Workshop on Usability Engineering. Feb 21-23, . 2011 at SEECS NUST. Agenda. Usability Engineering?. Why we need it?. What are its measures?. Where UE fits in the SDLC. Life starts at home.. Authors and Acknowledgements. Authors:. Lillie Greiman MA, Craig Ravesloot PhD, Bob Liston MA Parker Sanders, Andrew Myers. Acknowledgements:. This project is a collaboration between the RTC on Disability in Rural Communities at the University of Montana and the RTC on Community Living at the University of Kansas. . An Introduction. Usability. “..usability really just means making sure that something works well: that a person of average (or even below average) ability and experience can use the thing—whether it’s a Web site, a fighter jet, or a revolving door—for its intended purpose without getting hopelessly frustrated.”. User interfaces. Jaana Holvikivi. Metropolia. 2. Methods for usability evaluation. Wide variety of methods, often ad-hoc testing (not too systematic). More than one approach may be needed. one test cannot find all problems. Usability Report Discoveries. Prepared for: Condé Nast Company . Created by:. BAAP Corporation of Professional Usability Testing. Brittany Puente. Ava . Brandimore. Areej. Al . Touq. Porsia. Green. is about how a person feels about using a system. Science (HCI). Practical aspects. User eXperience. ease of use. efficiency. satisfaction. Practical aspects:. HCI:. Human-Computer Interaction. subjective in nature. F. or E-textbook Web. p. age Enhancements . DAVID COMEAUX AND EMILY FRANK. LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY. Agenda. User experience and why it matters. Our e-textbook initiative. Usability testing. Tests. JUNIOR TIDAL. WEB SERVICES & MULTIMEDIA LIBRARIAN. NEW YORK CITY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY, CUNY. April 6. th. , 2016. INTRODUCTIONS. . WHAT’S . THIS WORKSHOP ABOUT, ANYWAY?. WHAT IS USABILITY?. WHY USABILITY IMPORTANT. Fall 2014. 1. Anthony Tang. Learning Objectives. At the end of this lecture, you should be able to:. » Know how to select users for a usability test, and how many. » Be able to describe how to analyze data.