PPT-Structure of Deliberation

Day Five Concluding Reflections Group reflections Shared sense of direction or common ground Tensions What are we still struggling with as a group What do we still need to talk about. Facilitate Reaching the Goals of Deliberation. Goals of Deliberation. Create collective understanding of an issue. Allow people to express their opinions in a safe forum. Uncover the often unheard voices in a discussion. Facilitate Reaching the Goals of Deliberation. Goals of Deliberation. Create collective understanding of an issue. Allow people to express their opinions in a safe forum. Uncover the often unheard voices in a discussion. What is the best guarantee that deliberation will have a good outcome?. Aristotle: A Wise Leader. James Madison: A Well-Built System. Walter Lippmann: Expert Knowledge. John Dewey: Active and Informed Citizens. and the . PINet. Project. John Gastil. Dept. of Comm. Arts & Sciences. The Pennsylvania State University . February 24, 2013. Articles on Deliberative Democracy. Number of peer-reviewed articles with search terms in record fields. Terms = (Deliberation OR Deliberative) AND (Civic . Kristin L. Carman, PhD. Maureen Maurer, MPH. Explain public deliberation and application in health care. Identify best practices for successful public deliberation. Describe AHRQ’s Community Forum deliberative methods experiment. or. :. . What . we talk about when we talk about rhetorical citizenship . Christian Kock and Lisa Villadsen. Definition. Rhetorical Citizenship:. “. a way of conceptualizing the discursive, . processual. how an airport becomes (in)visible. José Reis. Tiago . S. antos Pereira. 4th CES International Seminar on the Foundations of . Economics. Value Conflict, Decision Making and Public Action. . 15 . and. Chapter Nineteen. National Security and Foreign Policy. Chapter Nineteen: Learning Objectives. Sketch the history of foreign policy and its relationship to citizenship. Describe the conflicting traditions of American foreign policy. Leeds, 30 June- 2 July 2010. Participatory Frames in Deliberative Devices: the Ideal-EU . case study. Julien . Talpin. and Laurence Monnoyer-Smith. University. of Compiègne – COSTECH. CDE . Research. e-deliberation project . at the City of Trikala . Greece. Trikala:. A medium sized . City at the . heart of Greece. 55.000 residents. A Citizen-centered City that sets the example as the 1. st. Digital City in Greece. Oliver Escobar. University of Edinburgh & What Works Scotland. St Andrews, 21. st. March 2015. Outline. Context: study /practice of participatory & deliberative democracy, governance and co-production. Chapter Fourteen. The Presidency. Chapter Fourteen: Learning Objectives. Summarize the key developments in the history of the American presidency and describe their importance. Describe the organization of the executive branch and how it influences presidential deliberation. What is the best guarantee that deliberation will have a good outcome?. Aristotle: A Wise Leader. James Madison: A Well-Built System. Walter Lippmann: Expert Knowledge. John Dewey: Active and Informed Citizens. What this lecture will do: . Identify challenges to moral deliberation and decision-making. Clarify the difference between deliberation and debate. Illustrate how moral deliberation and ethical accounting can be used to engage ethical problems.