Using EcAp IMAP indicators for MSP Experience from Montenegro Marina Marković 18012018 Venice The methodology 2 Integrated monitoring and assessment programme ID: 811358
Download The PPT/PDF document "© PAP/RAC Photo/S . Vilus" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
©
PAP/RAC Photo/S. Vilus
Using EcAp/IMAP indicators for MSP: Experience from Montenegro
Marina Marković
/
18.01.2018/ Venice
Slide2The
methodology
2
Integrated
monitoring
and
assessment
programme
–
EcAp
ecological
objectives
(11 EO)
and
EcAp
indicators
Slide3EcAp
objectives and indicators
3
EO 1
Biodiveristy
Habitat
distributional
range
/
extent
Condition
of
habitat
’s
typical species and communitiesSpecies distributional range (seabirds, mammals and reptiles, fish – EO3)Population abundancePopulation demographic characteristics Biodiversity index
EO 3 Comercial species7. Spawning stock biomass8. Total landings9. Fishing mortality10. Fishing effort11. Catch per unit of effort…Bycatch of vulnerable and non-targeted species Distribution of fish and shelfish farms
EO 5 Eutrophication13. Concentration of key nutrients in water column Chlorophill-a concentration in water column Trix index
EO 7 Hydrography15. Location and extent of the habitats impacted…
EO 8 Coastal ecosystems and landscapes16. Lenght of coastline subject to phs. disturbance Land use change Landscape quality
EO 9 Contaminants17. Concentration of key harmful contaminantsLevel of pollution effects Ocurrence…of acute pollution eventsLevel of contaminants in sea foodPercentage of intestinal enterococci
EO 2
Invasive
Species
EO 10 Marine
Litter
EO 11
Noise
from
Human
Activity
Slide4The
methodology
4
Integrated
monitoring
and
assessment
programme
–
EcAp
ecological
objectives
(11 EO)
and
EcAp indicatorsTwo main orientations:Utilisation of EcAP formarine vulnerability assessmentii) Utilisation of marine vulnerab.for MSPMethodology tested in Montenegro
(Boka kotorska Bay)
Slide5Methodology
5
Slide601
Assessing value of each env. component
:Habitats
6
Slide numbers to be added
as shown alongside
Value: very low – very high (
to
extremely important)
Criteria: protection status,
distribution
/
rareness
,
representativity
,
Slide702
Assessing impact on each env. component:Habitats
7
Existing
Impact
: very low – very highCriteria:
initial value index with impacts based on
euthrophication
(trix),
contaminats
, built-up areas, maritime way
Slide803
Assessing Vulnerability:Habitats
8
Slide numbers to be added
as shown alongside
Vulnerability
to
expected
impact
from
activities
(20)
: very low – very high
Each
individual activity of each component of the environmentCriteria: extent of expected change, value/impact index, adaptive capacityVulnerability of BD to recreat. boating
Slide903
Assessing Vulnerability:Integrated vulnerability of habitats
9
Slide numbers to be added
as shown alongside
Slide1003
Assessing Vulnerability:Integrated vulnerability of all environmental
components and activities
10
Slide11The
tool CAN:Planning (env.) recommendations
11
Slide12The
tool CAN
12
Slide13The
tool CAN
13
environmental
vulnerability
sea use
suitability
sea use options
optimum
compromise1
compromise2
IROPI?
Slide14The
tool CANNOT
14
environmental
vulnerability
sea use
suitability
sea use options
optimum
compromise1
compromise2
IROPI?
Slide15Limitations
and future
15
Slide numbers to be added
as shown alongside
Not all indicators fully suitable/necessary for VA
–
review
the
list
Complex
Expert
opinion
Further
testing and upgrading the tool
SUPREME – important component related to the development of a tool for assessing
cumulative impacts related to marine
Slide16Thank you
..
www.paprac.org