Syntax Formal syntax Learning objectives Explain the notions language organ and Universal Grammar Explain the similarities and differences ID: 914697
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The structure of sentences" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
The structure of sentences
Syntax
Slide2Formal syntax: Learning objectives
Explain
the
notions
“
language
organ”
and
“
Universal
Grammar
”
Explain
the
similarities
and
differences
between
languages
(
principles
and
parameters
)
Explain
how
sentences
are
constructed
Slide3Evidence for an independent language faculty
:
People
display
a
knowledge
of
grammar
that
is
deeper
than
what
they
could
get
from
the
linguistic
input
they
receive
–
the
poverty
-
of
-
the
stimulus
argument
Language
impairment
(
aphasia
/
Down
syndrome
):
language
independent
from
intelligence
Slide4Transformational generative grammarChomsky
:
structuralist
explanations
could
not
distinguish
between
sentences
such
as: John
is
easy
to
please
and
John
is
eager
to
please
While
the
surface
structure
is
similar
,
the
deep
structure
reveals
a major
difference
:
the
implied
subject
in
the
first
is
John
and
in
the
second
John
is
the
object
Slide5Transformational generative grammarChomsky
:
structuralist
grammars
could
not
explain
ambiguity
which
can
arise
from
the
syntactic
arrangement
of
clauses
,
e.g
.
Stolen
painting
found
by
tree
Slide6Universal Grammar: Principles & parameters
People
– “
pre
-
programmed
”
with
principles
of
grammar
–
Universal
Grammar
(UG)
Universal
grammar
has
a
biological
basis
–
a
language
organ
Principles
of
UG are
common
across
all
languages
One
of
these
principles
,
which
is
considered
as
an
essential
property
of
human
language
, is
recursion
:
allows
individuals
to
understand
an
unlimited
number
of
sentences
without
memorizing
each
one
of
them
(
cf
.
poverty
of
stimulus
)
Slide7Principle of recursionGrammars
are
finite
but
they
nonetheless
enable
individuals
to
produce
and
understand
an
infinite
number
of
sentences
This
is
made
possible
through
the
principle
of
recursion
Recursion
means
that
grammatical
processes
can
apply
more
than
once
,
which
enables
speakers
to
produce
sentences
of
indefinite
length
and
complexity
Slide8Mechanisms of recursionEmbedding
: One
can
always
add
additional
subordinate
clauses
within
a
frame
of
the
sentence
e.g
.
This
is
the
house
that
Jack
built
<
This
is
the
cheese
that
lay
in
the
house
that
Jack
built
<
This
is
the
mouse
that
nibbled
the
cheese
that
lay
in
the
house
that
Jack
built
etc
.
Coordination
:
We
can
use
coordinating
conjunctions
(
and
, but, or
etc
.) to link
an
indefinite
number
of
sentences
e.g
.
Mary
went
to
the
airport
and
John
went
to
the
bus station but
Joanna
cancelled
her
trip
and
went
to
the
mall
.
Slide9Parameters of UGSome of
the
principles
of
UG are
underspecified
,
which
means
that
they
can
be
realized
through
different
parameters
in
different
languages
Once
all
the
parameters
have
been
correctly
set for a
particular
language
,
then
we
have
a
grammar
for
this
language
Example
:
every
language
must
have
a
subject
–
principle
(
underspecified
);
subject
can
be
expressed
in
different
ways
–
parameter
values
(
pronouns
in
English
and
Italian
)
Slide10Modularity of language
Principles
and
parameters
–
part
of
a
syntactic
computational
mechanism
This
mechanism
feeds
both
the
articulatory
(
phonetic
)
component
and
the
interpretative
(
semantic
)
component
Each
of
these
components
functions
independently
-
modularity
Various
modules
can
feed
each
other
through
interfaces
Phonetic
form
(PF)
interface
with
articulatory
module;
Logical
form
(LF) –
interface
with
the
interpretative
module
Slide11Y-model: centrality of syntax
Syntax
draws
information
from
the
lexicon
and
“
feeds
”
both
PF
and
LF
PF LF Lexicon
Syntax
Slide12Table of grammatical categories
Type
Word
category
Examples
Phrasal
category
Lexical
Noun
(N)
Puppy
, park
Noun
Phrase
(NP)
Lexical
Verb
(V)
Take
,
run
,
beVerbal
Phrase (VP)Lexical
Adjective (A)Good, red, big
Adjective
Phrase
(AP)
Lexical
Adverb (
Adv
)
Happily
,
fast
Adverb
Phrase
(
AdvP
)
Functional
Determiner
(D)
This
,
the
, a, his
Determiner
Phrase
(DP)
Functional
Preposition
(P)
In
, on,
between
Prepositional
Phrase
(PP)
Functional
Complementizer
(C)
that
Complementizer
Phrase
(CP
Slide13Lexical vs. Functional categoriesWords
that
belong
to
lexical
categories
are
semantically
rich
and
contribute
primarily
to
the
meaning of the sentence (nouns, verbs
, adjectives, adverbs, prepositions
) – open categoryWords
in functional categories –
semantically weak, and contribute
more to the grammar of
sentences
than
to
the
meaning
(
e.g
.
determiners
) –
closed
category
Slide14CompositionalityGrammar of every
language
–
compositional
and
hierarchical
Sentences
are
made
of
smaller
constituents
(
phrases
), which in turn are made
up of even
smaller constituents (words)
Slide15Compositionality: Constituency tests1)
noun
replacement
(
A
girl
with
a golden
earring
ate
an
apple
>
She
ate
an
apple vs. *She with a golden earring
ate an apple)- only
an entire nominal
constituent can be
replaced with a pronoun 2)
verb replacement (She ate
an
apple
and
so
did
I vs. *
She
ate
an
apple
and
so
did
I a
pear
)-
only
an
entire
verbal
constituent
can
be
replaced
with
do
Certain
groups
of
words
form
close
units
:
constituents
,
e.g
.
Nominal
constituent
(1) (NP=
noun
phrase
), (2)
verbal
constituent
(VP=
verb
phrase
)
Slide16HierarchyEven
though
sentences
are
linear
on
the
surface
,
their
constituents
are
organized
in
a
hierarchical
way
Slide17ProjectionComposing the
structure
of
a sentence
begins
with
words
that
belong
to
categories
such
as
noun
,
verb, preposition, adjective, or determinerThese
words – heads of phrasesPhrases
are constructed bottom-up
: words are drawn
from a lexicon – a
mental dictionary stored in
people
’s
brain
-
and
merged
into
structures
Once
they
are
inserted
into
structures
they
project
phrases
(
XPs
)
of
the
same
category
(
e.g
. NP, VP, DP)
which
form
larger
constituents
that
compose
a sentence
Slide18MergeStructure building begins with
the
predicate
,
which
is
the
central element
of
a
clause
Once
a
predicate
projects
its
phrase, it has to be combined with
a phrase/s of the
type it needsTo do that
, the grammar must have a
mechanism that combines
phrasesThis is done by merging
one
phrase
with
another
Slide19Merge: example (1)
Those
children
want
a
puppy
Want
– a
transitive
verb
or a
two
-place
predicate
,
which
means
that it requires two NPs
of a certain type as
arguments: an agent argument and a
theme argument (thematic (theta) roles
)It projects two
empty positions which need
to
be
filled
by
NPs
(
e.g
.
Those
children
-
agent
and
a
puppy
-
theme
)
Direct
object
(
puppy
) –
internal
argument
because
it
forms
a
closer
unit
with
a
predicate
Subject
(
Those
children
) –
external
argument;
does
not
form
the
same
unit
as
predicate
and
direct
object
Substitution
test:
Those
children
want
a
puppy
and
so
do I; *
Those
children
want
a
puppy
and
so
do I a
cat
Slide20Nominal constituent merge (DP)
Each
of
the
nominal
constituents
that
the
predicate
selects
is a
product
of a separate merge operation which
consists of merging
a noun and a
determiner Note the nominal
constituent a puppy in
Example 1: The determiner
a
projects
a
determiner
phrase
(DP),
which
needs
a
noun
phrase
(NP) as
its
complement
Since
DP
selects
NP
and
not
viceversa
, DP is
the
head
of
the
nominal
constituent
(
e.g
.
a
puppy
)
Slide21DP mergeNP puppy is
inserted
in
the
complement
NP
node
projected
from
D
a
to
create
DP
a
puppy
DP NPD: a N:
puppy
Slide22VP mergeDP a
puppy
merges
with
V
want
to
create
VP
want
a
puppy
VP
DP
NP
V:
want D: a N: puppy
Slide23Merge: sentence constructionSo far the
grammar
has
created
a new
constituent
(VP)
by
merge
The
next
step
is to
merge
the VP with the external argument (subject
) to form the whole
sentenceThe external argument cannot
be directly merged
onto the VP (substitution shows
that they do not
form
the
same
constituent
)
We
need
a separate
node
(XP)
above
VP to
merge
the
subject
with
Tense phrase (TP)Semantic
core
of
the
sentence is
constituted
by
tense
Tense
projects
its
own
phrase
(TP)
which connects different constituents together
into a sentenceT-head contains
information related to tense
, as well as agreement
Tense phrases provide the central “
scaffolding” for a sentence, a structure to which
the
more
meaningful
lexical
phrases
will
be
attached
External
argument is
linked
with
VP
through
TP
Slide25Tense Phrase (TP)Those
children
want
a
puppy
.
TP
DP VP
those
NP
want
DP
children
a
NP
puppy
Slide26Tense PhraseTP takes
VP as
its
complement
The
external
argument (
subject
) is
not
a
complement
: it
does
not
occupy
a complement position but a specifier position to
the left of TP (
in English)Two syntactic
levels: VP – lexical information
pertaining to constituents; TP: grammatical
information pertaining to the sentence (
tense
+
agreement
)
There
is
an
even
higher
level
of
structure
,
which
contains
information
pertaining
to
discourse
: at
this
level
, sentence
type
(
e.g
.
declarative
,
interrogative
) is
encloded
This
highest
structural
level
is
usually
defined
as CP (
Complementizer
phrase
)
Slide27Complementizer phrase (CP)The
basic
function
of
complementizers
is to
turn
an
independent
sentence
into
a
complement
Therefore
each subordinate clause is headed by
an additional phrase
projected by the
complementizer (CP)Different types
of complementizers depending on the
type of subordinate
clause
:
in
declaratives
,
complementizers
like
that
(
I
heard
that
those
children
want
a
puppy
)
;
in
interrogtives
,
comps
like
if
(He
wondered
if
it
would
rain
)
A CP
selects
a TP
in
this
context
Slide28Projection of CP from that
CP
C:
that
TP
those
children
want
a
puppy
CP in simple sentences
Matrix
clauses
can
also
be
divided
in
different
types
(
e.g
.
declarative, interrogative, exclamative) In subordinate
contexts, different types
of clauses are associated with
different complementizers, which
means that clause
type is determined at the CP
level
Since
matrix
clauses
can
also
be
divided
along
the
same
lines
, CP is
also
present
and
determines
clause
type
in
matrix
contexts
(
even
though
there
is no
overt
complementizer
)
Slide30AdjunctionMerge joins
phrases
by
placing
one
phrase
into
the
complement
or
specifier
of
another
phraseIt is also possible to merge phrases
that are not complements or
specifiers of their host
phrase - this is called
adjunction and it adds
modifiers to phrasesHeads, complements
,
and
specifiers
make
up
the
core
meaning
of
a
phrase
,
while
adjuncts
add
extra
description
(
Those
little
children
in
the
park
want
a
puppy
badly
)
Slide31AdjunctionSince adjoined
phrases
are
different
from
complements
and
specifiers
,
adjunction
creates
a site for
Merge
by
copying the phrasal node of
the host phraseAll
the adjuncts are attached
to the extended structures
In this way the
integral parts of a phrase
,i. e.
head
,
specifier
,
and
complement
, are
distinguished
from
adjuncts
There
are
restrictions
on
the
number
of
complements
or
specifiers
we
can
have
in
the
sentence but
not
on
adjuncts
:
the
phrasal
node
can
be
copied
indefinitely
Slide32Adjunction VPVP
AdvP
DP
badly
NP
V:want D: a N:puppy
Slide33Movement Besides building phrase
structures
,
syntax
can
also
move
parts
of
phrase
structures
around
,
by detaching them from the
position in which they
were originally inserted
in the structure,
and moving them
somewhere else
Slide34Movement and deletionMovement
functions
by
copying
an
item
into
a new
location
,
leaving
a
copy
in
the original position (sometimes described as a trace
(t). This copy must later
be deleted, because
both copies cannot
be pronounced at the same timeSyntax
distinguishes between two
types
of
movements
:
head
movement
(
e.g
.
auxiliary
movement
in
questions
)
and
phrasal
movement
(
e.g
. wh-
movement
in
questions
)
Slide35Auxiliary movementAuxiliary (
Aux
)
movement
comes
into
play
when
we
want
to
generate
a
simple
question in English e.g. Does
the man like movies?
The auxiliary do is originally
inserted under T, acquiring
tense and agreement
features, and then
moves
to C
CP
has
an
empty
complementizer
C as
its
head
and
it
has
a TP as
its
complement
.
Aux
movement
in
the
case
of
simple
questions
takes
whatever
there
is
under
T
(do
+
tense
/
agreement
=
does
)
and
moves
it to
the
previously
empty
head
position
, C
Slide36Illustration CP TP C
does
T VP
DP
[
PRES/AGR
]
the
man
V DP
like
movies
Move
WH-movementWh-questions (
e.g
.
What
do
you
like?),
unlike
simple
questions
,
exhibit
two
different
movements
to CP:
head movement of the auxiliary (T-C)
and phrasal movement of
the wh-phrase (i.e
. wh-movement) Therefore, in
questions such as “What do
you like?”, CP must contain two
empty
positions
to
host
the
moved
elements
:
the
C-
head
position
for
the
auxiliary
and
the
specifier
position
for
the
wh-
phrase
Slide38WH-movementWhat appears
after
the
verb
like
, as
its
complement
.
Like
is a
transitive
verb
and
requires a direct object complement
, and what stands
in for the missing
thing that you would
like (e.g. What do
you like? I like coffee). First, aux
movement
applies
.
The
auxiliary
do
undergoes
head
movement
from
T to C.
Then
, wh-
movement
applies
.
The
wh-
phrase
moves
from
its
original
complement
position
(
since
it
replaced
the
complement
of
the
verb
like
) to
the
specifier
of
CP.
Slide39WH-movement CP
SpecCP
What
C TP
do
SpecTP
you
VP
T
V DP
aux
movement
like
what
wh-
movement
Slide40SummaryMuch of
grammatical
structure
does
not
have
to
be
“
learned
”
People
“
know
” a
lot
about what is or isn’t a possible grammatical
structure without having
been taught, or even having
had the right kind
of experience to have
learned it: they know it
because
principles
of
UG are
innate
The
principle
of
recursion
enables
individuals
to
produce
and
understand
an
infinite
number
of
sentences
based
on a
limited
input
(
cf
.
Poverty
of
stimulus
)
Slide41SummaryOne principle of
the
structure
of
sentences
–
compositionality
:
sentences
are
composed
of
clauses
and
phrases, which in turn are
made up of smaller
clauses and phrases
or wordsCompositionality - achieved
by projection of
simple phrases from words
from
the
mental
lexicon
The
phrases
projected
take
on
the
lexical
and
functional
categories
of
the
words
that
project
them
Slide42SummaryFormal syntax -
based
on
deducing
abstract
grammatical
principles
from
observing
what
sentences
are
possible
and not possible, without regard to how
they are usedFormal approaches
insist on the centrality
of syntax whithin
the human language faculty;
other types of approaches
(
e.g
.
functional
perspectives
) put
greater
emphasis
on
semantics
or
language
usage
Slide43Learning objectivesExplain
the
notions
“
language
organ”
and
“
Universal
Grammar
”
Explain
the
similarities
and
differences between languages (principles and
parameters)Explain how sentences
are constructed