/
To Abate or Not To Abate- To Abate or Not To Abate-

To Abate or Not To Abate- - PowerPoint Presentation

morton
morton . @morton
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2022-02-10

To Abate or Not To Abate- - PPT Presentation

Tis The Question Ellen M Hutchinson Esq PRELIMINARIES Knowledge of your overlay account Knowledge of number of cases Number of new abatement applications and pending ATB cases ID: 907811

atb small commercial trial small atb trial commercial decision industrial cases rates range large rental mid information abatement assessment

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "To Abate or Not To Abate-" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

To Abate or Not To Abate-T’is The Question

Ellen M. Hutchinson

,

Esq.

Slide2

PRELIMINARIES:

Knowledge of your overlay account

Knowledge of number of cases

Number of new abatement applications and pending ATB cases

Knowledge of legal budget

If have one: How much?

If not: How easy or difficult is it to get one?

Slide3

Create Processes and Procedures

Check jurisdictional information first

Categorize abatement applications –what works for you

SFR and Multi-family residential

Small Commercial and Industrial (< $1,500,000 assessment)

Mid Range Commercial and Industrial (> $1,500,000-$10,000,000 assessment)Large Commercial and IndustrialOther

Class

Group 1

Group 2

Residential

SFR

MFR

Comm/

Indust

Small

Not Small

Other

Claimed Exempt

Non Exempt Other

Slide4

Single Family Residental: Get to Root of Problem

Problem with PRC?

Comparative Assessment?

Lack of Understanding of Market? point here

Slide5

Multi Family: Income and/or Sales

Small MFR: 2-3-4 units

Use Comp Sales

Income and Rental Rates May Not Reflect Market. “Don’t rock the boat rental rates

Slide6

SMALL COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL:

Who Signed the Abatement Application?

Did the Applicant specify an estimate of FMV?

“Quick Hit Application?” Esp. With Very Small Assessment

Make Them Do The Work. Make Them Prove Overvalued.

Small Commercial Infrequently Progress to Trial

Slide7

SMALL COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL:

Know Your Market; Know Your Sales

Know Your Income Approach Parameters for That Sector

Rental rates for industrial buildings vs. warehouse vs retail

Vacancy Rates: Many small assessment

bldgs are owner occupied

Cap Rates

“One Size” does not fit all!

Slide8

MID RANGE COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL:

Know Your Market; Know Your Sales

Sale of Building vs. Sale of Guaranteed Income Stream

Should Have “Database” of Rental Rates via Information Requests

If No, Send Out Request For Income and Expense Data

Critical Data: Rental Rates AND Dates of LeaseRental Rates w/o Date of Lease; Total Income w/o Rental Rates and Date of Lease---Not very helpful

Slide9

MID RANGE COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL:

Should be able to determine tight range of FMV to gauge legitimacy of application

Can be difficult to settle at abatement stage—Attorney may be willing to wait, stack cases; makes potential appraisal and trial more financially feasible

Don’t finance ATB appeal by granting abatement without waiver

Slide10

LARGE COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL:

Don’t get in over your head!

Will rarely settle at abatement application. Attorney will stack cases for multiple years; makes trial /appraiser more financially feasible.

Want opportunity to get as much information as possible—Use AA period to request information: rent rolls, profit and loss statements,

Visit the property---information from a concentrated view

Spend time with information: data will always tell a story

You’ll likely deny AA, especially if previous pending cases

Slide11

LARGE COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL:

After TP files at ATB: Go get more information

Malls: 1000 pages of documents: tenant and lease histories; historical capex; occupancy data; occupancy cost ratios; historical tenant reimbursements for CAM and for Real Estate Taxes

Request copy of any and all appraisals or estimates of value.

For large cases---check on latest ATB decisions for that sector—latest cap rate; rental rate; vacancy rate---good guides.

Slide12

SETTLEMENT, MEDIATION OR TRIAL:

“TRY YOUR GOOD CASES; SETTLE YOUR BAD ONES”

Settlement: All about leverage. Willingness to go to trial (or appearance of such willingness); Willingness of Appellant to go to trial or lack thereof). What is your estimate of

fmv

and how does that compare to the assessment? What is the dollar difference between the parties?

Settlement: know what your bottom line number is

Settlement: Can you trade a higher number now for a lower number in a future fiscal year?

Settlement: Too politically hot: Do you need the ATB to make the decision?

Slide13

SETTLEMENT, MEDIATION OR TRIAL:

MEDIATION: ATB mediation services

Agree to Mediate: sends signal of GREAT willingness to settle. Can walk away; but difficult to do so.

Slide14

THE DECISION TO GO TO TRIAL

IS DIFFERENT FOR SMALL, MID RANGE OR LARGE CASE

Small /Mid Range

Cost factor is different

Don’t necessarily need an appraiser

Length of trial shorterMay not need court reporter

Prep time is less

Potential loss is less

Can send a strong signal to other taxpayers in the city /town

Slide15

THE DECISION TO GO TO TRIAL

IS DIFFERENT FOR SMALL, MID RANGE OR LARGE CASE

LARGE CASE

Cost factor: Appraisal fee; appraiser testimony; legal costs,

cort

reporterPossible outcomes? Total victory? Big loss? Middle ground?Probability of likely outcomes.

Abatement costs of outcomes;

Interest costs ( with stacked cases and 1.5 -2 years for ATB findings)

Slide16

THE DECISION TO TAKE AN APPEAL

APPEALS ARE RARE

EXPENSIVE!

USUALLY NEVER FOR SMALL OR MID RANGE CASES –THOUGH SOME SCREAM FOR APPEALS (SOLAR; YOUTH HOSTEL CASE)

IDEA: ATB ERRED IN ITS DECISION. LEGAL ISSUES.

APPEALING PARTY MUST CONVINCE APPEALS COURT

OUTCOMES: ATB DECISION AFFIRMED; ATB DECISION IS VACATED WITH DECISION FOR ASSESSORS; ATB DECISION IS VACATED AND REMANDED BACK TO ATB

Slide17

Ellen M. Hutchinson, Esq

Law Office of Ellen M. Hutchinson

100 Cummings Center

Suite 207-P

Beverly, MA 01915

978-867-7660