PPT-Judicial Selection
Author : myesha-ticknor | Published Date : 2016-04-30
Nonpartisan Election 14 Partisan Election 6 Legislative Appointment 2 Merit Selection Hybrid 9 Merit Selection 16 Gubernatorial Appointment 3 Most Democratic Least
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Judicial Selection" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Judicial Selection: Transcript
Nonpartisan Election 14 Partisan Election 6 Legislative Appointment 2 Merit Selection Hybrid 9 Merit Selection 16 Gubernatorial Appointment 3 Most Democratic Least Democratic Citizen Nominating Commission. AMERICA Judicial Executive Legislative Judicial Executive Legislative Judicial Executive Legislative Judicial Executive Legislative Judicial Executive Legislative Judicial Executive Legislative Judi . by Annette Demers . BA LLB MLIS. Judicial Decisions. Content. Judicial Decisions. Use . CanLii. to find this source:. Immigration and Refugee Board of . Canada, Refugee Appeal Division. Content. RESTRAINT. Definition. Examples. Picture. Court Cases. Judicial Restraint. Judicial Restraint. Definition. Judges should always try to decide on cases on the basis of:. . 1. The original intent of those who wrote the constitution.. HYPOTHESIS I. An ‘ordered society’ cannot exist without the rule of law; the rule of law, either in the private or public sense, cannot exist absent a competent and trusted criminal justice system; a competent and trusted criminal justice system cannot exist without an independent judicial authority acting in concert with an independent prosecuting body each free from corruption in reality as well as perception, that is, an independent judiciary functioning symbiotically with an autonomous prosecutorial authority, both of which enjoy the trust and confidence of the society they serve. . Part III. 2. Statutory Preclusion of Judicial Review. Congress has the power to limit judicial review of agency actions. Subject to constitutional limits. What if Congress is silent on the availability of judicial review in a particular statute?. . by Annette Demers . BA LLB MLIS. Judicial Decisions. Content. Judicial Decisions. Use . CanLii. to find this source:. Immigration and Refugee Board of . Canada, Refugee Appeal Division. Content. SALIENT FEATURES OF BRITISH JUDICIAL SYSTEM. Absence of Single Judicial System . Independence of the Judiciary. Lack of Administrative Courts. Lack of the Provision of Judicial Review. Rule of Law. Jury System. Characteristics of American judicial review. Dual judicial system. Independent judiciary. Judiciary has been separated from the executive . Power of judicial review. Organization of federal court in America. Part Two. . by Annette Demers . BA LLB MLIS. Judicial Decisions. Judicial . decision = public record. Majority . are . “unreported” . (only found at the . registry . office). Judicial Decisions. What’s best for the US?. Judicial activism. Court should take active role in solving social, economic, & political problems. Courts uphold ‘guardian ethic’. Examples. Establishing ‘one man, one vote’ principle to reapportionment [Baker vs. Carr, 1961]. Branch in North Carolina. Three Branches of Government . Legislative Branch – Makes the law. Executive Branch – Enforces the law. . Judicial Branch – Interprets and applies the law. James Madison. The Judicial Branch – The Federal Court System. The Federal Court System. Articles of Confederation. Major Weakness – No Courts. Each State had own courts and laws. The Judicial Branch – The Federal Court System. Classroom Moot Court. Riley vs. California . Can police search your cell phone without a warrant?. If you were responsible for selecting judges in California, what would you look for?. California Courts . Phase 1. January 2024. Honorable Kathleen J. Kroll – . kkroll@pbcgov.org . Blan L. Teagle – . bteagle@floridajqc.com . 1. Learning Objectives. Identify common problems arising under the Code of Judicial Conduct..
Download Document
Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Judicial Selection"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.
Related Documents