By K1652744 20162017 Module Criminological Research and Practice Analysed Studies RAPE OF OLDER PEOPLE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM CHALLENGING THE REAL RAPE STEREOTYPE ID: 631589
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "ORAL PRESENTATION: RAPE STUDIES" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
ORAL PRESENTATION: RAPE STUDIES
By
K1652744
2016/2017
Module
:
Criminological
Research
and
Practice
Slide2
Analysed
Studies
RAPE OF OLDER PEOPLE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM: CHALLENGING THE ‘REAL – RAPE’ STEREOTYPE (
BOWS H., WESTMARLAND N., 2015
)
LONGITUDINAL RESEARCH WITH SEXUAL ASSAULT SURVIVORS: A METHODOLOGICAL REVIEW (
CAMPBELL R., SPRAGUE B.H., COTRRILL S., SULLIVAN M.C., 2011
)Slide3
First Research
Study
: Older Victims
Underestimated
area of
research
.
In the UK
only
three
studies
(
Ball &
Fowler
,;
Jeary
; Lea
et al
.)
were
published
in the last decade.
Knowledge and
understanding
of the
prevalence
,
characteristics
and
impacts
are
extremely
limited
.
‘REAL - RAPE’.
Described
by
Estrich
(
1987
)
as
a
stereotype
involving
a white,
young
victim
attacked
at
night by a
stranger
motivated
by
sexual
gratification
.
Curse
of the
term
in
marginalising
research
. Slide4
Research Methods
AIM:
Investigate the nature and
extent
of
serious
sexual
offences
reported
to the
police
by
older
victims
(60 or over)
.
Funded
by the
Economic
and Social
Research
Council
[ES/J500082/1].
TOOLS:
The
Freedom
of Information Act 2000 and the
Freedom
of Information Act 2002
were
used
to
issue
requests
for data
held
by
all
of the
police
forces
in the UK.
FOI
request
was
piloted
and
sent
to
all
46 UK
police
forces
. The
requests
were
divided
in
two
parts
:
2
questions
(
N
of
recorded
rape and
sexual
assault
by
penetration
between
1/01/2009 and 31/12/2013)
N of rape and
sexual
assault
offences
involving
a
victim
aged
60 or >,
same
period
.
Total
response
: 45/46. Slide5
Research Findings
Overall
number
of
reported
offences
involving older victim was low compared with younger age groups. - Total number: 87,230. Involving older victims: 655 (0,75%).Gender - Female victims (92%). Male victims (7%). Perpetrators were most likely to be younger than their victims. - Majority of offenders were aged 60 (66%), 40-59 (42%). Victims were aged between 60 and 98. Most perpetrators were known to the victim. - Aquaintance (26%) - Partner/Husband (20%) - Stranger (20%)Location - 54% of offences were committed in the victim’s home.
80% of
victims
knew
their
perpetrator.Slide6
Methodological limitations
Police data are
limited
to
recorded
offences
only
and, since the current research estimates only 15% of sexual offences are reported, this implies a narrow picture. No measure of prevalence. Way and systems used not uniform in all forces. Comparison is not reliable. Problematic access to data through FOI requests if no clear definitions.Time and cost effective. Slide7
Advantages
Accessibility
Under – utilized.
Avoids
challenges
such
as negotiating access to research site or data. Practical. Effective Generating new insights Slide8
Conclusions
An
analysis of sexual
violence
against
older
women must therefore take into account the social structural postion of older women in society and consider a range of factors such as age and gender. The existing research exploring sexual violence against older people has tended to group all women over a certain age together as an homogeneous groups and has not been sensitive to the differences. Recently,, there has been some acceptance that older people can experience sexual violence. Slide9
Second Research
Study
: Sexual Assault Survivors
Methodological
review
of
projects
(
N=32) that have used prospective longitudinal designs to study occurrence of sexual victimization throughout the lifespan and/or the process of change during rape recovery. Five questions: What were the substantive foci of these longitudinal studies?2) How where survivors recruited?3) What participation rates were typical?4) How long were participants followed overtime and with what success rates?5) What incentives were used to increase participation?Slide10
Research Metods
3 phase
process
: 1)
PsycINFO
/
PsycARTICLES
database + Cambridge Scientific = 32 published articles 2) Identification of 10 authors + 15 additional articles3) Manual search over the last 20 years in selected journals + 3 articles Final Sample: 53 articles Slide11
Research Findings
First Question
:
What
are the
substantive
topics
in longitudinal sexual assault research to date? The substantive foci of the 32 projects classified into five categories: - understanding the mental health sequelae of sexual victimization - multiple effective therapeutic interventions for alleviation of synthoms / prevention of substance abuse - sexual revictimization - development of interventions for preventions of victimization / revict. - measurement development Slide12
Second Question: How do
researchers
identify and recruit
sexual
assault
survivors
for
longitudinal research? - 22 projects srecruited survivors from medical, legal, and/or sociale service programs - 11 recruited exclusively from first-response help-seeking sites - 11 recruited through collaboration with newspapers and programs.Third Question: What are Survivor’s Initial Participation Rates in Longitudinal Research? - Participation rates ranged from 12% to 69%, but most were less than 45%. Not unexpected since the study involves the recruitment of survivors immediately postassault when trauma is
still fresh.Slide13
Fourth
Question
: What retention
rates
are
typical
in
longitudinal
sexual assault research? - As expected, retention rates were higher in college student studies of revictimization or revictimization interventions (81%). - Studies of postassault health sequelae and interventions (73-77%) - Treatment completion rates (68-87%). Fifth Question: What incentives are used in longitudinal sexual assault research? - Half of the projects provided financial compensation, from 10$ to 60$ for the first assessment. Many of the project, increased the amount of compensation for further assessments and/or provided a bonus for follow-ups. Slide14
Methodological Limitations
Expensive
Lenghty
Requires
extensive
resources
to do wellTracking women over time who had experienced violence poses additional safety and ethical considerations. Difficulty in keeping survivors safe from researchers. Slide15
Advantages
Longitudinal
studies
offer
the
possibility
of
establishing
causality by analysing temporal effects and ruling out confounding explanations. Singer and Willett (2003) divided longitudinal studies in: questions regarding change and event occurrence. They allow to see rises and falls over time in focal variables. It can also be used to determine wether different people have variable patterns of within- individual change and predicts differences. Can help to identify risk assault and factors that predict victimization.Understanding of survivor’s well-being.Slide16
Conclusions
This
analysis of 32
longitudinal
sexual
assault
projects highlights that choice of recruitment sites and the use of participant incentives may make a difference in initial participation rates.With incentives of therapeutic interventions, participation rates tend to be higher than in nonintervention projects. It is important to keep in mind that most rape survivors do not seek community services so all the health and security facilities can only reach segments of what must be presumed to be a diverse, heterogeneous population. Slide17
References
Campbell C., Sprague B.H.,
Cottrill S., Sullivan M.C. (2011) Longitudinal
Research
With
Sexual
Assault
Survivors
: A
Methodological Review. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(3), 433-461.Bows H., Westmarland N. (2017) Rape of Older People in the United Kingdom: Challenging the ‘Real – Rape’ Stereotype. British Journal of Criminology, 57, 1-17.Slide18
Thank
you
for your attention