/
Principle Number One: Principle Number One:

Principle Number One: - PowerPoint Presentation

myesha-ticknor
myesha-ticknor . @myesha-ticknor
Follow
401 views
Uploaded On 2016-05-25

Principle Number One: - PPT Presentation

The Road to Hell is Paved with Good Intentions Izzy Kalman httpwwwpsychologytodaycomblogpsychologicalsolutionbullying201008principlenumberonetheroadhellispavedgoodintenti Examples of Good Intentions with Bad Effects ID: 333758

intentions good bad examples good intentions examples bad effects interventions cousin moral rachels james actions killing letting bullying die

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Principle Number One:" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Principle Number One: The Road to Hell is Paved with Good Intentions

Izzy Kalmanhttp://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/psychological-solution-bullying/201008/principle-number-one-the-road-hell-is-paved-good-intentiSlide2

Examples of Good Intentions with Bad Effects:Slide3

Examples of Good Intentions with Bad Effects:Slide4

Examples of Good Intentions with Bad Effects:Slide5

Examples of Good Intentions with Bad Effects:Slide6

Examples of Good Intentions with Bad Effects:Slide7

Examples of Good Intentions with Bad Effects:

How many examples do you need to prove a point?Slide8

“Good intentions do not automatically lead to moral actions. We must consider the possible negative consequences before we institute anti-bullying interventions. If our interventions cause more harm than good, the interventions are not moral regardless of the loftiness of our intentions.”Slide9

James Rachels, “Killing and Letting Die”Slide10

James Rachels, “Killing and Letting Die”

Smith: Intends to kill cousin for $, plans to do so, prepares to do so, travels to the location, and holds cousin underwater to kill himJones: Intends to kill cousin for $, plans to do so, prepares to do so, travels to the location, but finds cousin drowning and lets him dieSlide11

James Rachels, “Killing and Letting Die”

Rachels: Jones is no better than Smith; they are morally equivalent; their actions have the same effect (namely, the death of the cousin)Slide12

“Good intentions do not automatically lead to moral actions. We must consider the possible negative consequences before we institute anti-bullying interventions. If our interventions cause more harm than good, the interventions are not moral regardless of the loftiness of our intentions.”