Case 31 Asha Clarke Background The Tobacco Products Control Act prohibited all advertising and promotion of tobacco products and the sale of a tobacco product unless its package includes prescribed unattributed health warnings and a list of toxic ingredients ID: 168697
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "RJR-MacDonald Inc. V. Canada (Attorney G..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
RJR-MacDonald Inc. V. Canada (Attorney General)
Case 31
Asha ClarkeSlide2
Background
The
Tobacco Products Control Act
prohibited all advertising and promotion of tobacco products and the sale of a tobacco product unless its package includes prescribed unattributed health warnings and a list of toxic ingredients.
RJR-MacDonald and Imperial Tobacco Inc. The appellants sought the declaration that the Act was altogether ultra
vires
Parliament and invalid as an unjustified infringement of freedom of expression guarantees under the Charter.
Both
cases were heard at the Quebec Superior Court which found that the Act was ultra
vires
Parliament and infringed upon s.2 (b) of the Charter. The Court of Appeal reversed the judgement. Slide3
Decision
The appeal should be allowed.
Parliament had the competence to enact the legislation under the criminal law power or POGG
ss.4,8,9 of the act are inconsistent with the right of freedom of expression in s.2(b) of the Charter and do not constitute a reasonable limit on that right that can be justified under s.1 of the Charter. Slide4
Questions for the Supreme Court
Whether Parliament had legislative competence to enact the legislation under either, the peace, order and good government of Canada clause or the criminal law power.
Whether the Act infringed the right to freedom of expression protected by s. 2(b) of the Charter and, if so, whether it was saved under s. 1 of the Charter. Slide5
Question
The SCC has expressed the values promoted by the freedom of expression guarantee as ‘the quest for truth, the promotion of individual self-development and the protection and fostering of a vibrant democracy where the participation of all individuals is accepted and encouraged’.
Given this, do you believe that the right of freedom of expression of RJR MacDonald Inc –tobacco advertising and promotion, relates to these values?