/
The Accelerated Learning Program The Accelerated Learning Program

The Accelerated Learning Program - PowerPoint Presentation

myesha-ticknor
myesha-ticknor . @myesha-ticknor
Follow
371 views
Uploaded On 2018-02-26

The Accelerated Learning Program - PPT Presentation

The Community College of Baltimore County Student Comments Im not sure Im really college material Im really a bad writer but my English teacher thinks Im a good writer ID: 637123

eng fall alp 101 fall eng 101 alp 052 passed traditional pass developmental writing 100 number 2010 fa10 fa07

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The Accelerated Learning Program" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

The Accelerated Learning Program

The

Community College

of Baltimore CountySlide2

Student Comments

.

“I’m not sure I’m really college material.”Slide3

.

“ I’m really a bad writer

, but my English

teacher thinks I’m a good writer, so this semester Iwrote really good papers, so she wouldn’t find out what a bad writer I am.”

Student CommentsSlide4

What is a Co-Requisite Model?

Co-Requisite Models

Developmental programs in which the developmental course is a co-requisite, not a pre-requisite, to the credit-level course.Slide5

Compressed

Co-Requisite Models

Co-Requisite Models

Writing

Center

NCBO

MyCompLab

3 hoursSlide6

ENG

101

ENG 052

ALP

Developmental student are in ENG 101

Cohort effect

Attitude toward the developmental course changes

Allows exposures to stronger role models

T

ime for non-cog issues

T

ime for reading

Time for individual attentionSlide7

How does an ALP developmental class

differ from a traditional one?

Goal of an ALP developmental course:

.

for

students

to pass

the developmental course and be ready for first-year composition.

for

students

to pass first-year composition course.

Goal of a traditional developmental course:Slide8

traditional

stand-alone

developmental writing

high school

or

middle school

ALP

ENG 101Slide9

passed

ENG 052

3604

65%

did

not

pass

ENG 052

1941

35%

took

ENG 052

Fa07-

Fa10

5545

100%

took

ENG

101

2661

48%

took no

more writing

courses

943

17%

passed

ENG 052

485

82%

didn’t

pass

ENG

052

107

18%

took

ENG 052

Fa07-

Fa10

592

100%

took

ENG

101

592

100%

took no

more writing

courses

0

0%

traditional

developmental

students:

f

all 2007 –

f

all 2010

ALP students:

fall 2007 –

fall 2010

data from Cho, Kopko, & Jenkins, 2012 (CCRC)Slide10

passed

ENG 052

3604

65%

did

not

pass

ENG 052

1941

35%

took

ENG 052

Fa07-

Fa10

5545

100%

took

ENG

101

2661

48%

took no

more writing

courses

943

17%

passed

ENG 052

485

82%

didn’t

pass

ENG

052

107

18%

took

ENG 052

Fa07-

Fa10

592

100%

took

ENG

101

592

100%

took no

more writing

courses

0

0%

traditional

developmental

students:

f

all 2007 –

f

all 2010

ALP students:

fall 2007 –

fall 2010

data from Cho,

Kopko

, & Jenkins, 2012 (CCRC)

passed

ENG

101

Fa07-

Fa10

1829

33%

didn’t pass

ENG

101

Fa07-

Fa10

832

15%

passed

ENG

101

Fa07-

Fa10

438

74

%

didn’t pass

ENG

101

Fa07-

Fa10

154

26

%Slide11

passed

ENG

102

55410%

F, I, or W

in

ENG102

167

3

%

passed

ENG 052

3604

65%

did

not

pass

ENG 052

1941

35%

took

ENG 052

Fa07-

Fa10

5545

100%

took

ENG

101

2661

48%

took no

more writing

courses

943

17%

passed

ENG 052

485

82%

didn’t

pass

ENG

052

107

18%

took

ENG 052

Fa07-

Fa10

592

100%

took

ENG

101

592

100%

took no

more writing

courses

0

0%

passed

ENG

101

1829

33%

didn’t

pass

ENG

101

832

15%

passed

ENG

101

438

74%

didn’t

pass

ENG

101

154

26%

passed

ENG

102

195

33%

haven’t

passed ENG102

101

17%

traditional

developmental

students:

f

all 2007 –

f

all 2010

ALP students:

fall 2007 –

fall 2010

data from Cho, Kopko, & Jenkins, 2012 (CCRC)Slide12

10%

2

0%

Percent Earning 12 or More Credits within 1 Year

30

%

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2009

4

0

%

39%

N=149

34%

N=288

33%

N=550

3

8%

N=587

35%

N=669

20

%

N=1406

14

%

N=1328

15

%

N=1042

16

%

N=884

13

%

N=687

traditional

dev

writing

ALP Slide13

5

0

%

Success Rates for 7 Participating Colleges

7

5

%

2

5

%

comparison cohort

ALP cohort

76

%

37

%

8

6

%

33

%

73

%

3

8%

68

%

48

%

94

%

3

9

%

51

%

35

%

82

%

47

%

A

5-10000

suburbs

M

idwest

B

10-20000

suburbs

M

idwest

C

20000+

urban

Southwest

D

<5000

small town

M

idwest

E

<5000

suburbs

Southeast

F

<5000

rural

Southeast

G

5-10000

small town

Mid-AtlanticSlide14

257 schoolsSlide15

2

00

100

0

120

0

1400

8

0

0

6

0

0

4

0

0

Number Taking ALP or Traditional

E

ach Fall

Fall

2008

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2007

traditional

dev

writing

ALP

Fall

2014

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

34

68

149

288

550

587

669

700

670

Fall

2015

966

1142

1406

1328

1042

884

590

408

687Slide16

2

00

100

0

120

0

1400

8

0

0

6

0

0

4

0

0

Number Taking ALP or Traditional

E

ach Fall

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

traditional

dev

writing

ALP

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

149

288

550

587

669

Fall

2008

Fall

2007

34

68

966

1142

1406

1328

1042

884

687

Fall

2014

700

670

590

408

Fall

2015Slide17

2

000

4

00

0

6

00

0

3

000

8000

7

00

0

5

00

0

Analyzing Pass Rates

number

in cohort

2009-2013

1

000

traditional

ALP

total

5343

7589

2246Slide18

2

000

4

00

0

6

00

0

3

000

8000

7

00

0

5

00

0

number

in cohort

2009-2013

1

000

traditional

ALP

total

5343

number who

passed 101

2009-2013

1584

30%

2246

1409

63%

7589

number who

would have passed 101

if we had fully scaled up

4781

2993

Analyzing Pass RatesSlide19

2

000

4

00

0

6

00

0

3

000

8000

7

00

0

5

00

0

number

in cohort

2009-2013

1

000

traditional

ALP

total

number who

passed 101

2009-2013

number who

would have passed 101

if we had fully scaled up

4781

2993

1788

3576

Analyzing Pass RatesSlide20

26 Boeing 737-700s137 seats per planeSlide21

Obstacles to Scaling Up ALP

Faculty developmentClassroom spaceCredentials issuesIntegrating reading and writingCoordinating with advisorsIncreasing number of 101s; eliminating freestanding developmental writing coursesCoordination with other acceleration initiatives and student success courseInertiaSlide22

2

00

100

0

1200

1400

8

0

0

6

0

0

4

0

0

Number Taking ALP or Traditional

E

ach Fall

Fall

2008

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2007

traditional

dev

writing

ALP

Fall

2014

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2015

34

966

68

1142

149

1406

288

1328

550

1042

587

884

700

590

670

408

669

687

Fall

2016

100%Slide23

The Accelerated Learning Program

The

Community College

of Baltimore County

padams2@ccbcmd.edu