ENG 1800 02 Micki Green Steph Kaup Jamie Rubbelke Joe Setrum Overview Introduction Criteria Methods Results Recommendations Conclusion Introduction Studied the feasibility of adding a sports dome on Hamline Universitys campus ID: 490907
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Building a Sports Dome at Hamline Univer..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Building a Sports Dome at Hamline University: A Feasibility Study
ENG 1800 02
Micki
Green, Steph
Kaup
, Jamie
Rubbelke
, Joe
SetrumSlide2
Overview
Introduction
Criteria
Methods
Results
Recommendations
ConclusionSlide3
Introduction
Studied the feasibility of adding a sports dome on Hamline University’s campus
Researched the growing trends of athletic and recreational facilities on college campuses
Researched the need for an additional facility
Limited space on campus
Increase student’s intentions to be physically activeSlide4
Criteria
Do we have support from:
The student body
Faculty and staff
Will building a new facility increase physical activities among all students?
Will a sports dome benefit everybody at Hamline?Slide5
Methods
Researched growing trends on college campuses pertaining to physical activity among students
Interviewed Athletic Director at Concordia Saint Paul
Construction of Sea Foam Stadium in 2009
Created and distributed 31 surveys to Hamline Undergraduate studentsSlide6
Growing Trends
Sports domes in area
Augsburg, Concordia Saint Paul, University of Minnesota
Minnetonka and West Paul
Expanding of small college campuses
Pressure from Division I schools
More innovative facilities
Recruiting
Kelderman
(2008)Slide7
Growing Trends
Cultural Shift
College students expect a certain quality of life
Modern athletic facilities
S
ports and fitness programsSlide8
Need for Space
Walker Field House and Hutton Arena
Booked with athletic events
Non-athletes seeking recreational opportunities
Other events
Examples: Relay for Life, CommencementSlide9
ResultsSlide10Slide11Slide12
Results
Participants would like to see more space on campus
Students will be more physically active with an additional facility
Students will attend school events in a sports domeSlide13
Conclusion
Growing trends
More innovative facilities
Quality of life
Recruitment
Support from Hamline Community
Athletes and non-athletes
Need for additional space
Increase in physical activity
School hosted eventsSlide14
Recommendations
Conduct additional research
Larger sample population
Cost-analysis
Turf playing surface
Constructing sports dome
Maintenance
Revenue opportunities
Location
Klas
Field
Patterson and Meredith FieldsSlide15
References
Artinger
, L.,
Clapham
, L., Hunt, C.,
Meigs
, M., Milord, N., Sampson, B., Forrester, S. (2006). The social benefits of intramural sports. NASPA Journal, 43(1), 1.
Blumenthal, K. (2009). Collegiate recreational sports: pivotal players in student success. Planning for Higher Education, 37(2), 52-62
Kelderman
, E. (2008). Small Colleges Sweat over Sports Facilities. Chronicle Of Higher Education, 54(44), A1.
Kilpatrick, M., Edward, H., Bartholomew, J. (2005). College students’ motivation for physical activity: differentiating men’s and women’s motive for sport participation and exercise. Journal of American College Health, 54(2), 87.Slide16
References
Prins
, R., Van
Empelen
, P.,
Te
Velde
, S.,
Timperio
, A., Van
Lenthe
, F.,
Tak
, N., ...
Oenema
, A. (2010). Availability of sports facilities as moderator of the intention-sports participation relationship among adolescents. Health Education Research, 25(3), 489-497.
Reed, Julian. (2007). Perceptions of the availability of recreational physical activity facilities on a university campus. Journal of American College Health, 55(4), 189-194.
Wakely
, J. (2013). Single-source responsibility: an innovative way to build college sports, fitness and rec facilities. New England Journal of Higher Education,
1.