PPT-EXPERT TEACHER RUBRIC

  BEGINNING DEVELOPING CAPABLE EXPERT Safe culturally competent learning environment Little classroom management No clear procedures Has favorite students and ignores others Engages in negative comments about students during class Many discipline referrals May blur physical or verbal boundaries. =. existentialism + symbolic satire. Theater of the Absurd . emerged in Europe and the U.S. after World War II. people were discouraged by the unjustness of the world. Existentialism. Theater of the Absurd began at the same time as existentialism.. Elisa Palmer. edTPA. Coordinator, Illinois State University. December 2014. “Understanding the Rubric Level Progressions” Guides. Detail what each level of each rubric means. Can be shared with any individuals involved in . KY Writing Project Conference. September . 12, 2015. 1. carol.franks@education.ky.gov. rebecca.woosley@education.ky.gov. TARGETS. I can evaluate rubrics for quality.. I can identify when a rubric is congruent to expectations of grade level standards.. How to:. design a rubric that does its job. write precise criteria and descriptors. make your rubric student-friendly . Expert Input. . Experts agree:. Rubrics are hard to design.. Rubrics are time-consuming to design.. What is a rubric?. An evaluation tool. As simple as a checklist (holistic) to highly complex (analytic). Quality control. Provide feedback for areas of improvement. Can be developed and used by students, instructors, & administrators. (Four 5-point scale=20 points). Content – Information presented. The meaning of significance as distinguished form.. Significance or profundity; meaning. The amount of substance contained. Content – Information presented. What is the core reason you do the work you do? . Three-Minute “Speech” . Three-Minute “Speech” . Three-Minute “Speech” . Find a partner from another table. . Both partners will share their speech.. English . Language . Specialist . www.robdanin.com. . What is a Rubric?. An “authentic” method of assessing the learner. Provides a . transparent . assessment process. A guideline for rating student performance (Asmus, 1999).. Can incorporate Neural, Genetic and Fuzzy Components. Expert Systems can perform many functions. Rules can be fuzzy, quantum, modal, neural, Bayesian, etc.. Special inference methods may be used. Concepts of Knowledge Representation: . Dimensions 1, 2 and 7. 1. Problem Clarification . Clearly articulates the problem after a thorough exploration of multiple solution paths. Fully considers the needs of the client and the perspectives of other stakeholders during problem clarification. . Crosswalk. December 2016 version compared with October 2018 version.. CVC-OEI Course Design Rubric. We are excited to roll out the October 2018 version of the CVC-OEI Course Design Rubric to all of you. . Sabra Gage, WTEA President. MSDWT . Teacher Evaluation Information. Review of Updates. 2014-2015. Overview of Updates. Replaced . OwnIt. ! Teacher Evaluation Software with Standard for Success. Revised Domain II Rubric. Jeni. Corn, . jocorn@ncsu.edu. . Malinda Faber, . mmfaber@ncsu.edu. . Friday Institute, NC State University . . Rubric available from . http. ://ncdlplan.fi.ncsu.edu/resources. /. . NC Digital Learning Plan .