PPT-Toulmin model of argument

British Logician Frustrated with the inability of formal logic to explain everyday arguments Came up with a model for practical reasoning Two triads first triad Claim the main point the arguer is trying to maketakes the form of a proposition. Argumentative Essay. Position statement reminders. Is the thesis of your paper. Should specifically state what you are trying to convince your audience to believe and/or do. Should express your opinion (not a fact) about the issue under discussion. Megan . Tomei. -Jameson. Associate professor, Speech Communication. Goals. Promote critical thinking. Teach students that “arguing” is not about “winning” and “losing”. Debate should be used to promote a civil dialogue in which everyone learns something. Classical, Toulmin and Rogerian. The Classical Model. Introduction. Lead-in. Overview of the situation. Background. Position statement (thesis). Appeals (ethos, pathos, logos) and evidence. Appeals: to ethics, character, authority (ethos); to emotions (pathos); to reason logos). from class on 11.3/11.4. 11.3/11.4 warm-up: Toulmin practice. CLAIMS. fact. : claims which focus on empirically verifiable . phenomena. judgment/value. : claims involving opinions, attitudes, and subjective evaluations of . (. WA Chapter. 4). CS4001 . Kristin Marsicano. Formal vs. Real-World logic. What is the difference?. What is the role of assumptions?. Formal vs. Real-World logic. What is the difference?. Formal logic. Method of Logic. Claim. Data. Warrant/Bridge. Backing/Foundation. Counterclaim. Rebuttal. Toulmin. Method of Logic. CLAIM. The overall THESIS the writer will argue for. Toulmin. Method of Logic. DATA. Savannah Nordeen . Heidi Nam . Sean Capangpangan. Justin Cruz. How do you proceed in an argument?. Try to present and support your claims to your intended audience in a way that is persuasive. Try to make an argument valid and effective by doing research and examine the issue carefully and comprehend fully. QW: Prior Knowledge . What do you know, assume, remember, or imagine about the . Classical Argument. ? Based on this name and some of the things we’ve been discussing, what do you think it MIGHT involve?. This chapter will cover. Reality assumptions. Patterns of deductive reasoning. Using deductive reasoning to test logic, discover truth, make decisions, avoid stereotyping, and understand argument.. Prastudy. . Fauzi. , . Helger. . Lipmaa. , Michal . Zajac. University of Tartu, Estonia. Estonian-Latvian Joint Theory Days, 14.10.2016. ASIACRYPT 2016. Our results. A new efficient CRS-based NIZK shuffle argument. Essay . & Paragraph Structure for Literary Analysis, . a Type of argument essay. Professor Lisa Yanover. English Department. Napa Valley College. PART 1: . The . Toulmin. Model of Argumentation. Ying Lin. 1. , Heng Ji. 1. , Fei Huang. 2. , . Lingfei. Wu. 3. 1. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. 2. Alibaba DAMO Academy . 3. IBM Research. Motivation. Pipelined models suffer from the error propagation problem and disallow interactions among components.. Lingfei. Wu. ACL2020. A Joint Neural Model for Information Extraction with . Global Features. Motivation. Pipeline models suffer from the . error propagation problem. and disallow interactions among components.. Reading through Lenses. The Lenses. Rhetorical Situation: Exigence, Audience, Purpose. The Appeals: Ethos, Pathos, Logos. Arrangement: What comes after what and why? . Functional Structure: Oration Model and .