/
A CASE STUDY Criminal Verdicts (Scotland) A CASE STUDY Criminal Verdicts (Scotland)

A CASE STUDY Criminal Verdicts (Scotland) - PowerPoint Presentation

olivia-moreira
olivia-moreira . @olivia-moreira
Follow
396 views
Uploaded On 2018-03-08

A CASE STUDY Criminal Verdicts (Scotland) - PPT Presentation

Bill Criminal Verdicts Scotland Bill Purpose of the Bill A Bill for an Act of the Scottish Parliament to make provision for the removal of the not proven verdict as one of the available verdicts in criminal proceedings and for a guilty verdict to require an increased majority of jurors ID: 642690

committee bill parliament introduced bill committee introduced parliament stage proven debate proposal verdict read verdicts government majority bills members

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "A CASE STUDY Criminal Verdicts (Scotland..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

A CASE STUDY

Criminal Verdicts (Scotland)

Bill Slide2

Criminal Verdicts (Scotland) Bill

Purpose of the Bill

A Bill for an Act of the Scottish Parliament to make provision for the removal of the not proven verdict as one of the available verdicts in criminal proceedings; and for a guilty verdict to require an increased majority of jurors.Why was the Bill introduced?Mr McMahon said

“I have long been convinced that a three-verdict system is no longer defensible in a modern justice system. It causes confusion and uncertainty for victims of crime and for accused persons. The principle that all accused persons are innocent until proven guilty entitles them to a straightforward acquittal in every case in which the prosecution case cannot be established beyond a reasonable doubt.”Who introduced the bill?This Member’s Bill was introduced by Michael McMahon MSP on 27 November 2013.Slide3

The Draft Proposal

Proposal of a Members Bill

A Member’s Bill

Lodge with Non Government Bills Unit (NGBU)Consultation – no less than 12 weeksThe Final ProposalLodge final proposal with NGBU

18 members from half the parties must support

A Member’s Bill starts with a different process to a Government or Committee Bill

Read the briefing explaining what the bill covers

Click to see the consultation responses

Find out more about Members’ Bills

Bill (as Introduced)

Once the Bill is introduced, it follows the same process as other billsSlide4

Stage Two

Committee scrutinise bill line by line and make amendments

Stage Three

Parliament debate and vote

Stage One

Justice Committee call for evidence

Committee report to Parliament

The Committee commends Michael McMahon for bringing this Bill before the Parliament and helping provoke more debate about the not proven verdict…

A

clear majority of the Committee supports the intention of the Bill to abolish the not proven verdict but not the proposal in relation to jury majorities.

The

Committee hopes that the research on juries announced by the Scottish Government will proceed soon.

A majority of the Committee is therefore unable to support the general principles of the Bill

.”

Watch the committee meeting

Read the committee report

Read the Committee call for evidence

Stage One Debate

Members vote

on

general principles

Decision Time

For

28,

Against

80, 0

abstentions.

Bill Falls

Status of the Bill

The Bill fell after the general principles of the bill were not agreed to

by the Parliament at its Stage 1 debate on 25 February 2016.

Summary of the Progress of the Bill

Read the written responses